Effects of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program on transition outcomes of newly graduated nurses in their first year: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yaqi Zhu , Yuanyuan Zhang , Jie Wu , Xiaohua Ge , Yaqing Zhang
{"title":"Effects of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program on transition outcomes of newly graduated nurses in their first year: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yaqi Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Ge ,&nbsp;Yaqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to measure the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program and determine its impact on transition of newly graduated nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excessive transition shock for newly graduated nurses can harm their well-being and increase nursing mistakes and patient issues. Therefore, helping newly graduated nurses in transitioning is crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study randomly assigned 90 newly graduated nurses to receive either mentorship intervention or usual training. Two of them lost at the first follow-up and their data were not included in the outcome analysis. Outcomes included transition shock, job satisfaction and intent to stay. Generalized Linear Mixed Model was conducted to compare outcomes at baseline to follow-up. Semi-interviews with mentees and mentors were conducted for the qualitative part. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative responses. This report adheres to the CONSORT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 6 months post-intervention, participants in the intervention group showed significant mitigation of rising levels of transition shock (Coef.=-0.223, p &lt; 0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, participants showed significant mitigation of declining of job satisfaction (Coef.=0.075, p &lt; 0.05) and intent to stay (Coef.=0.435, p &lt; 0.01). Qualitative findings showed participants’ positive experience with the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study showed that the intervention not only effectively mitigated the transition shock for newly graduated nurses but also slowed the decline in job satisfaction and intent to stay, offering valuable insights for future nursing research, education and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595325000733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to measure the feasibility and acceptability of a theory-driven hybrid online-offline mentorship program and determine its impact on transition of newly graduated nurses.

Background

Excessive transition shock for newly graduated nurses can harm their well-being and increase nursing mistakes and patient issues. Therefore, helping newly graduated nurses in transitioning is crucial.

Design

A parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial design was used.

Method

The study randomly assigned 90 newly graduated nurses to receive either mentorship intervention or usual training. Two of them lost at the first follow-up and their data were not included in the outcome analysis. Outcomes included transition shock, job satisfaction and intent to stay. Generalized Linear Mixed Model was conducted to compare outcomes at baseline to follow-up. Semi-interviews with mentees and mentors were conducted for the qualitative part. Thematic analysis was used to code the qualitative responses. This report adheres to the CONSORT.

Results

At 6 months post-intervention, participants in the intervention group showed significant mitigation of rising levels of transition shock (Coef.=-0.223, p < 0.001) compared with the control group. Moreover, participants showed significant mitigation of declining of job satisfaction (Coef.=0.075, p < 0.05) and intent to stay (Coef.=0.435, p < 0.01). Qualitative findings showed participants’ positive experience with the program.

Conclusion

The study showed that the intervention not only effectively mitigated the transition shock for newly graduated nurses but also slowed the decline in job satisfaction and intent to stay, offering valuable insights for future nursing research, education and management.
理论驱动的线上线下混合型指导计划对新毕业护士第一年过渡结果的影响:一项随机对照试验
目的本研究旨在衡量理论驱动的线上线下混合型师徒计划的可行性和可接受性,并确定其对新毕业护士转型的影响。背景对于刚毕业的护士来说,过度的过渡休克会损害他们的健康,增加护理失误和患者问题。因此,帮助刚毕业的护士过渡是至关重要的。设计采用平行双臂随机对照试验设计。方法将90名刚毕业的护士随机分为师友干预组和常规培训组。其中两人在第一次随访时死亡,他们的数据未纳入结果分析。结果包括过渡冲击、工作满意度和留下来的意愿。采用广义线性混合模型比较基线和随访的结果。质性部分对学员和导师进行半访谈。采用主题分析对定性回答进行编码。本报告遵循CONSORT。结果干预6个月后,与对照组相比,干预组参与者的过渡性休克水平升高有显著缓解(Coef =-0.223, p <; 0.001)。此外,参与者的工作满意度(Coef =0.075, p <; 0.05)和留下来的意图(Coef =0.435, p <; 0.01)的下降有显著缓解。定性调查结果显示,参与者对该项目有积极的体验。结论干预不仅有效缓解了新毕业护士的过渡冲击,而且减缓了新毕业护士工作满意度和留任意愿的下降,为今后护理研究、教育和管理提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信