Variations in documentation of alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnoses across race, ethnicity, and sex in a health system that assesses AUD symptoms as part of routine primary care

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robert L. Ellis , Kevin A. Hallgren , Emily C. Williams , Joseph E. Glass , Isaac C. Rhew , Malia Oliver , Katharine A. Bradley
{"title":"Variations in documentation of alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnoses across race, ethnicity, and sex in a health system that assesses AUD symptoms as part of routine primary care","authors":"Robert L. Ellis ,&nbsp;Kevin A. Hallgren ,&nbsp;Emily C. Williams ,&nbsp;Joseph E. Glass ,&nbsp;Isaac C. Rhew ,&nbsp;Malia Oliver ,&nbsp;Katharine A. Bradley","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Prior studies have highlighted potential inequities in provider-documented alcohol use disorder (AUD) across race, ethnicity, and sex. Whether subgroup differences in AUD reflect true variation or diagnostic disparities is unknown. This study aims to describe variations in the prevalence of provider-documented AUD across race, ethnicity, and sex: 1) after adjustment for alcohol consumption, and 2) after additional adjustment for patient-reported AUD symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In Kaiser Permanente Washington, patients with high-risk drinking (AUDIT-C score 7–12; 2.4 % of screened patients) complete a validated Alcohol Symptom Checklist of DSM-5 AUD symptoms with results documented in electronic health records. This study included Asian, Black, Latine, and White patients in primary care settings (03/2015–02/2022) who indicated high-risk drinking and thus completed an Alcohol Symptom Checklist. The prevalence of AUD was estimated for women and men across race or ethnic groups using marginally standardized generalized linear models. Models were first unadjusted, then adjusted for consumption (AUDIT-C scores 7–12), and then consumption plus AUD symptom counts (0−11).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 14,442 patients with high-risk drinking (6.0 % Asian, 5.8 % Black, 7.8 % Latine, 80.4 % White; 32.1 % women), provider-documented AUD increased with alcohol consumption and the number of AUD symptoms. The prevalence of AUD across 8 subgroups defined by race, ethnicity, and sex varied in analyses adjusted for alcohol consumption alone (range 11.6 % [95 % CI: 9.3–14.4] to 20.2 % [18.9–21.5]). However, after adjustment for both alcohol consumption and AUD symptoms, the prevalence of AUD ranged from 11.2 % [95 % CI: 7.9–15.6] to 15.0 % [95 % CI: 13.9–16.3] in women, and from 11.0 % [95 % CI: 8.7–13.8] to 15.1 % [95 % CI: 14.3–16.0] in men. AUD did not appear to vary across race or ethnicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this study of primary care patients with high-risk drinking in a regional healthcare system that routinely assesses AUD symptoms, variations in provider-documented AUD diagnosis across race, ethnicity, and sex were observed after adjusting for alcohol consumption but were diminished after adjusting for AUD symptoms. This may suggest that among patients with similar alcohol consumption and AUD symptoms, intersectional variations in AUD diagnosis may be less apparent. Assessing AUD severity with Alcohol Symptom Checklists may help support equitable clinical AUD diagnosing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 209654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Prior studies have highlighted potential inequities in provider-documented alcohol use disorder (AUD) across race, ethnicity, and sex. Whether subgroup differences in AUD reflect true variation or diagnostic disparities is unknown. This study aims to describe variations in the prevalence of provider-documented AUD across race, ethnicity, and sex: 1) after adjustment for alcohol consumption, and 2) after additional adjustment for patient-reported AUD symptoms.

Methods

In Kaiser Permanente Washington, patients with high-risk drinking (AUDIT-C score 7–12; 2.4 % of screened patients) complete a validated Alcohol Symptom Checklist of DSM-5 AUD symptoms with results documented in electronic health records. This study included Asian, Black, Latine, and White patients in primary care settings (03/2015–02/2022) who indicated high-risk drinking and thus completed an Alcohol Symptom Checklist. The prevalence of AUD was estimated for women and men across race or ethnic groups using marginally standardized generalized linear models. Models were first unadjusted, then adjusted for consumption (AUDIT-C scores 7–12), and then consumption plus AUD symptom counts (0−11).

Results

Among 14,442 patients with high-risk drinking (6.0 % Asian, 5.8 % Black, 7.8 % Latine, 80.4 % White; 32.1 % women), provider-documented AUD increased with alcohol consumption and the number of AUD symptoms. The prevalence of AUD across 8 subgroups defined by race, ethnicity, and sex varied in analyses adjusted for alcohol consumption alone (range 11.6 % [95 % CI: 9.3–14.4] to 20.2 % [18.9–21.5]). However, after adjustment for both alcohol consumption and AUD symptoms, the prevalence of AUD ranged from 11.2 % [95 % CI: 7.9–15.6] to 15.0 % [95 % CI: 13.9–16.3] in women, and from 11.0 % [95 % CI: 8.7–13.8] to 15.1 % [95 % CI: 14.3–16.0] in men. AUD did not appear to vary across race or ethnicity.

Conclusions

In this study of primary care patients with high-risk drinking in a regional healthcare system that routinely assesses AUD symptoms, variations in provider-documented AUD diagnosis across race, ethnicity, and sex were observed after adjusting for alcohol consumption but were diminished after adjusting for AUD symptoms. This may suggest that among patients with similar alcohol consumption and AUD symptoms, intersectional variations in AUD diagnosis may be less apparent. Assessing AUD severity with Alcohol Symptom Checklists may help support equitable clinical AUD diagnosing.
在将酒精使用障碍(AUD)症状作为常规初级保健的一部分进行评估的卫生系统中,不同种族、民族和性别的酒精使用障碍诊断记录的差异
先前的研究强调了提供者记录的酒精使用障碍(AUD)在种族、民族和性别方面的潜在不平等。AUD的亚组差异是否反映了真实的变异或诊断差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述不同种族、民族和性别的提供者记录的AUD患病率的变化:1)调整饮酒后,2)对患者报告的AUD症状进行额外调整后。方法在华盛顿Kaiser Permanente,高危饮酒患者(AUDIT-C评分7-12;筛查患者(2.4%)完成DSM-5 AUD症状的有效酒精症状检查表,并将结果记录在电子健康记录中。本研究包括亚洲人、黑人、拉丁人和白人在初级保健机构(2015年3月- 2022年2月)的高危饮酒患者,并完成了酒精症状检查表。使用边缘标准化的广义线性模型估计不同种族或民族的女性和男性的AUD患病率。首先不调整模型,然后调整消费(AUDIT-C评分7-12),然后调整消费加上AUD症状计数(0 - 11)。结果14442例高危饮酒患者中,亚裔6.0%,黑人5.8%,拉丁裔7.8%,白人80.4%;32.1%女性),医生记录的AUD随着饮酒和AUD症状数量的增加而增加。根据种族、民族和性别定义的8个亚组的AUD患病率在单独饮酒调整后的分析中有所不同(范围为11.6% [95% CI: 9.3-14.4]至20.2%[18.9-21.5])。然而,在对饮酒和AUD症状进行调整后,女性AUD患病率从11.2% [95% CI: 7.9-15.6]到15.0% [95% CI: 13.9-16.3],男性AUD患病率从11.0% [95% CI: 8.7-13.8]到15.1% [95% CI: 14.3-16.0]。AUD似乎没有因种族或民族而异。结论:在本研究中,在常规评估AUD症状的区域医疗保健系统中,对高危饮酒的初级保健患者进行了研究,在调整饮酒后观察到不同种族、民族和性别的提供者记录的AUD诊断差异,但在调整AUD症状后减少。这可能表明,在饮酒和AUD症状相似的患者中,AUD诊断的交叉差异可能不太明显。用酒精症状清单评估AUD严重程度可能有助于支持公平的临床AUD诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信