{"title":"A systematic review of immunotherapies in combination with temozolomide as treatment for glioblastoma","authors":"Brendan Chen, Janet Alder","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glioblastomas comprise a significant percentage of malignant adult central nervous system tumor cases and patients typically do not survive longer than a year after diagnosis. There are few treatment options for patients which meaningfully prolong survival other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There are many clinical trials examining immunotherapy-chemotherapy combination treatments. This systematic review uses database research of clinical trials to identify randomized controlled immunotherapy-temozolomide combination trials which evaluate the median overall and progression-free survival in adult patients. The review also assesses the study design of selected trials for risk of bias. The desired outcomes are presented as they are reported in the selected studies and are evaluated based on reported statistical significance. We included 10 studies in the final selection and found five studies focused on bevacizumab as an immunotherapy in combination with temozolomide while five used unique interventions. Of those studies, only bevacizumab and autologous dendritic cell vaccination reported an improvement in desired outcomes compared to the control. The risk of bias analysis identified only one study with high risk of bias and five studies with unclear risk of bias in blinding. Our study identifies promising treatments and recommends further examination of those interventions but does not make any recommendations on changes to current glioblastoma treatments. The authors have no funding or conflict of interests to declare. The authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for writing this review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Glioblastomas comprise a significant percentage of malignant adult central nervous system tumor cases and patients typically do not survive longer than a year after diagnosis. There are few treatment options for patients which meaningfully prolong survival other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There are many clinical trials examining immunotherapy-chemotherapy combination treatments. This systematic review uses database research of clinical trials to identify randomized controlled immunotherapy-temozolomide combination trials which evaluate the median overall and progression-free survival in adult patients. The review also assesses the study design of selected trials for risk of bias. The desired outcomes are presented as they are reported in the selected studies and are evaluated based on reported statistical significance. We included 10 studies in the final selection and found five studies focused on bevacizumab as an immunotherapy in combination with temozolomide while five used unique interventions. Of those studies, only bevacizumab and autologous dendritic cell vaccination reported an improvement in desired outcomes compared to the control. The risk of bias analysis identified only one study with high risk of bias and five studies with unclear risk of bias in blinding. Our study identifies promising treatments and recommends further examination of those interventions but does not make any recommendations on changes to current glioblastoma treatments. The authors have no funding or conflict of interests to declare. The authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for writing this review.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.