A systematic review of immunotherapies in combination with temozolomide as treatment for glioblastoma

Q3 Medicine
Brendan Chen, Janet Alder
{"title":"A systematic review of immunotherapies in combination with temozolomide as treatment for glioblastoma","authors":"Brendan Chen,&nbsp;Janet Alder","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2025.100888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Glioblastomas comprise a significant percentage of malignant adult central nervous system tumor cases and patients typically do not survive longer than a year after diagnosis. There are few treatment options for patients which meaningfully prolong survival other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There are many clinical trials examining immunotherapy-chemotherapy combination treatments. This systematic review uses database research of clinical trials to identify randomized controlled immunotherapy-temozolomide combination trials which evaluate the median overall and progression-free survival in adult patients. The review also assesses the study design of selected trials for risk of bias. The desired outcomes are presented as they are reported in the selected studies and are evaluated based on reported statistical significance. We included 10 studies in the final selection and found five studies focused on bevacizumab as an immunotherapy in combination with temozolomide while five used unique interventions. Of those studies, only bevacizumab and autologous dendritic cell vaccination reported an improvement in desired outcomes compared to the control. The risk of bias analysis identified only one study with high risk of bias and five studies with unclear risk of bias in blinding. Our study identifies promising treatments and recommends further examination of those interventions but does not make any recommendations on changes to current glioblastoma treatments. The authors have no funding or conflict of interests to declare. The authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for writing this review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294225000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glioblastomas comprise a significant percentage of malignant adult central nervous system tumor cases and patients typically do not survive longer than a year after diagnosis. There are few treatment options for patients which meaningfully prolong survival other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. There are many clinical trials examining immunotherapy-chemotherapy combination treatments. This systematic review uses database research of clinical trials to identify randomized controlled immunotherapy-temozolomide combination trials which evaluate the median overall and progression-free survival in adult patients. The review also assesses the study design of selected trials for risk of bias. The desired outcomes are presented as they are reported in the selected studies and are evaluated based on reported statistical significance. We included 10 studies in the final selection and found five studies focused on bevacizumab as an immunotherapy in combination with temozolomide while five used unique interventions. Of those studies, only bevacizumab and autologous dendritic cell vaccination reported an improvement in desired outcomes compared to the control. The risk of bias analysis identified only one study with high risk of bias and five studies with unclear risk of bias in blinding. Our study identifies promising treatments and recommends further examination of those interventions but does not make any recommendations on changes to current glioblastoma treatments. The authors have no funding or conflict of interests to declare. The authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for writing this review.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信