A Review of Quality Improvement Framework for Industry 4.0

Ricardo Baiochi , Mauro Lizot , Eduardo Alves Portela Santos
{"title":"A Review of Quality Improvement Framework for Industry 4.0","authors":"Ricardo Baiochi ,&nbsp;Mauro Lizot ,&nbsp;Eduardo Alves Portela Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the dynamic landscape of modern organizations, the pursuit of continuous improvement is paramount for sustaining competitiveness amidst evolving market demands. Quality programs, particularly Six Sigma, have emerged as indispensable tools for achieving organizational excellence by emphasizing defect reduction and process variation control. However, challenges arise in quality 4.0 environments, especially when confronting issues unrelated to Six Sigma principles, unstructured data, or large datasets, necessitating additional data-driven methodologies. This article aims to review the evolving needs of quality 4.0 by investigating complementary data-driven methodologies to Six Sigma and exploring untapped opportunities through their integration. Employing the Methodi Ordinatio as a systematic literature review method, we organize and synthesize existing literature on the integration of Six Sigma and industry 4.0 in the context of quality 4.0. Our findings reveal a critical gap in integration, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive framework. We identify a collection of methodologies that enhance each stage of the Six Sigma process, including Execution Framework (Agile), Define (Value Stream Mapping), Measure (Process Mining), Analysis (Simulation), Improvement (MCDM), and Control (Big Data). This article contributes to the Held by proposing a functional framework for quality improvement in the context of quality 4.0. By synthesizing diverse data-driven methodologies, it offers organizations a road map to industry 4.0 concepts, enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and overall excellence. The identified collection of methodologies provides a nuanced approach to addressing challenges in each stage of the Six Sigma process, filling a vital gap in the current literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"132 ","pages":"Pages 13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the dynamic landscape of modern organizations, the pursuit of continuous improvement is paramount for sustaining competitiveness amidst evolving market demands. Quality programs, particularly Six Sigma, have emerged as indispensable tools for achieving organizational excellence by emphasizing defect reduction and process variation control. However, challenges arise in quality 4.0 environments, especially when confronting issues unrelated to Six Sigma principles, unstructured data, or large datasets, necessitating additional data-driven methodologies. This article aims to review the evolving needs of quality 4.0 by investigating complementary data-driven methodologies to Six Sigma and exploring untapped opportunities through their integration. Employing the Methodi Ordinatio as a systematic literature review method, we organize and synthesize existing literature on the integration of Six Sigma and industry 4.0 in the context of quality 4.0. Our findings reveal a critical gap in integration, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive framework. We identify a collection of methodologies that enhance each stage of the Six Sigma process, including Execution Framework (Agile), Define (Value Stream Mapping), Measure (Process Mining), Analysis (Simulation), Improvement (MCDM), and Control (Big Data). This article contributes to the Held by proposing a functional framework for quality improvement in the context of quality 4.0. By synthesizing diverse data-driven methodologies, it offers organizations a road map to industry 4.0 concepts, enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and overall excellence. The identified collection of methodologies provides a nuanced approach to addressing challenges in each stage of the Six Sigma process, filling a vital gap in the current literature.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信