On a heuristic evaluation system for Industry 5.0 with respect to interventions: the case of training in businesses

Procedia CIRP Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.021

Alexios Papacharalampopoulos , Olga Maria Karagianni , Panagiotis Stavropoulos , Unai Ziarsolo , Peter Totterdill , Rosemary Exton , Steven Dhondt , Peter Oeij , Matteo Fedeli , Massimo Ippolito , Fabrizio Timo , Arturas Gumuliauskas , Dovilė Eitmantytė , Unai Elorza

{"title":"On a heuristic evaluation system for Industry 5.0 with respect to interventions: the case of training in businesses","authors":"Alexios Papacharalampopoulos , Olga Maria Karagianni , Panagiotis Stavropoulos , Unai Ziarsolo , Peter Totterdill , Rosemary Exton , Steven Dhondt , Peter Oeij , Matteo Fedeli , Massimo Ippolito , Fabrizio Timo , Arturas Gumuliauskas , Dovilė Eitmantytė , Unai Elorza","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Manufacturing has been undergoing many changes, with the latest one being the paradigm shift to Industry 5.0. In this long procedure, training is required at any level, from operators to managers. Thus, interventions must be made so that Teaching and Learning Factories are upgraded towards integrating Industry 5.0. To this end, an evaluation system has to be made, assessing the feasibility of the three pillars’ integration. This procedure can concern a qualitative assessment (or a quantitative one) of the feasibility and the other implicated concepts, such as upskilling. At the same time, multilevel metrics are relevant, such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to company practices, manufacturing itself, jobs and trainees. Herein, a summative differential evaluation scheme, based on heuristic aspects, is explored, under the framework of the aforementioned TLF interventions. Examples of companies’ ex-ante characterization are given. Then, potential extensions are being discussed towards achieving formative evaluation and potentially towards KPIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"132 ","pages":"Pages 122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manufacturing has been undergoing many changes, with the latest one being the paradigm shift to Industry 5.0. In this long procedure, training is required at any level, from operators to managers. Thus, interventions must be made so that Teaching and Learning Factories are upgraded towards integrating Industry 5.0. To this end, an evaluation system has to be made, assessing the feasibility of the three pillars’ integration. This procedure can concern a qualitative assessment (or a quantitative one) of the feasibility and the other implicated concepts, such as upskilling. At the same time, multilevel metrics are relevant, such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to company practices, manufacturing itself, jobs and trainees. Herein, a summative differential evaluation scheme, based on heuristic aspects, is explored, under the framework of the aforementioned TLF interventions. Examples of companies’ ex-ante characterization are given. Then, potential extensions are being discussed towards achieving formative evaluation and potentially towards KPIs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Procedia CIRP

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量