Modelling ventilation with spontaneous breaths: Improving accuracy with shape functions and slice method

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ivan Ruiz , Guillermo Jaramillo , José I. García , Andres Valencia , Alejandro Segura , Andrés Fabricio Caballero-Lozada
{"title":"Modelling ventilation with spontaneous breaths: Improving accuracy with shape functions and slice method","authors":"Ivan Ruiz ,&nbsp;Guillermo Jaramillo ,&nbsp;José I. García ,&nbsp;Andres Valencia ,&nbsp;Alejandro Segura ,&nbsp;Andrés Fabricio Caballero-Lozada","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Accurate detection of spontaneous breathings (SBs) and respiratory asynchronies during mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for optimizing patient care and preventing lung injuries. Conventional models often fail to capture these events with sufficient accuracy. To address this gap, this study introduces new equations incorporating custom shape functions and the Slice method, aiming to deliver a more robust, “bedside” model with potential applications in real-time asynchrony detection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three new equations were developed to incorporate shape functions accounting for pressure- and volume-dependent changes in elastance, and a fourth model combined these shape functions with the Slice method. Retrospective data from 8 ICU patients (each providing 6 mins of ventilatory data) were split into two datasets of 4 patients each: one for model development and refinement, and the other for testing performance in reproducing ventilatory waveforms. Model accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) and Mean Residual Error (MRE). This evaluation focused on how effectively each model captured actual patient breathing mechanics, particularly in the presence of SBs or respiratory asynchronies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The proposed models, especially the one combining shape functions with the Slice method—Recruitment Distention Elastance Analysis + Slice (RDEA + Slice)—exhibited a strong correlation with patient data, evidenced by high <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values. While conventional models achieved <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> coefficients between 0.25 and 0.87, the new models improved these to 0.90–0.97. The RDEA + Slice model attained significantly lower MRE values (0.012–0.032), underscoring its superior accuracy in capturing dynamic changes. Furthermore, a unique identifiability analysis confirmed that the model parameters can be reliably estimated, supporting its potential for clinical application<em>.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The new bedside models, especially RDEA + Slice, demonstrate promise in enhancing mechanical ventilation management. By accurately capturing ventilatory mechanics in presence of SBs, they hold potential to refine ventilator settings, reduce lung injury risks, and integrate with real-time diagnostic tools for detecting patient-ventilator asynchronies—ultimately supporting more personalized and effective ICU care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 108685"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725001026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Accurate detection of spontaneous breathings (SBs) and respiratory asynchronies during mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for optimizing patient care and preventing lung injuries. Conventional models often fail to capture these events with sufficient accuracy. To address this gap, this study introduces new equations incorporating custom shape functions and the Slice method, aiming to deliver a more robust, “bedside” model with potential applications in real-time asynchrony detection.

Methods

Three new equations were developed to incorporate shape functions accounting for pressure- and volume-dependent changes in elastance, and a fourth model combined these shape functions with the Slice method. Retrospective data from 8 ICU patients (each providing 6 mins of ventilatory data) were split into two datasets of 4 patients each: one for model development and refinement, and the other for testing performance in reproducing ventilatory waveforms. Model accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2) and Mean Residual Error (MRE). This evaluation focused on how effectively each model captured actual patient breathing mechanics, particularly in the presence of SBs or respiratory asynchronies.

Results

The proposed models, especially the one combining shape functions with the Slice method—Recruitment Distention Elastance Analysis + Slice (RDEA + Slice)—exhibited a strong correlation with patient data, evidenced by high R2 values. While conventional models achieved R2 coefficients between 0.25 and 0.87, the new models improved these to 0.90–0.97. The RDEA + Slice model attained significantly lower MRE values (0.012–0.032), underscoring its superior accuracy in capturing dynamic changes. Furthermore, a unique identifiability analysis confirmed that the model parameters can be reliably estimated, supporting its potential for clinical application.

Conclusions

The new bedside models, especially RDEA + Slice, demonstrate promise in enhancing mechanical ventilation management. By accurately capturing ventilatory mechanics in presence of SBs, they hold potential to refine ventilator settings, reduce lung injury risks, and integrate with real-time diagnostic tools for detecting patient-ventilator asynchronies—ultimately supporting more personalized and effective ICU care.
用自然呼吸建模通风:利用形状函数和切片法提高准确性
背景与目的机械通气(MV)过程中自主呼吸(SBs)和呼吸不同步的准确检测对于优化患者护理和预防肺损伤至关重要。传统的模型往往不能以足够的精度捕捉这些事件。为了解决这一差距,本研究引入了包含自定义形状函数和Slice方法的新方程,旨在提供一个更具鲁棒性的“床边”模型,在实时异步检测中具有潜在的应用前景。方法建立了三个新的方程,其中包含了考虑压力和体积相关弹性变化的形状函数,并将这些形状函数与Slice方法结合在一起。8例ICU患者(每人提供6分钟通气数据)的回顾性数据被分成两组数据,每组4例患者:一组用于模型开发和改进,另一组用于测试再现通气波形的性能。采用决定系数(R2)和平均残差(MRE)评估模型精度。该评估侧重于每个模型如何有效地捕获实际的患者呼吸机制,特别是在存在SBs或呼吸异步的情况下。结果所提出的模型,特别是形状函数与切片方法相结合的模型-招募膨胀弹性分析+切片(RDEA + Slice) -与患者数据具有较强的相关性,R2值较高。传统模型的R2系数在0.25到0.87之间,而新模型将其提高到0.90到0.97。RDEA + Slice模型的MRE值明显较低(0.012-0.032),说明其在捕捉动态变化方面具有较好的准确性。此外,独特的可识别性分析证实了模型参数可以可靠地估计,支持其临床应用的潜力。结论新型床旁模式,尤其是RDEA + Slice,在加强机械通气管理方面具有良好的应用前景。通过准确捕捉SBs患者的通气机制,它们有可能改进呼吸机设置,降低肺损伤风险,并与实时诊断工具集成以检测患者-呼吸机异步,最终支持更个性化和更有效的ICU护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信