Standardized pancreaticojejunostomy by double U-stitch technique in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomies

Jiang Liu , Jie Hua , Rong Tang , Wei Wang
{"title":"Standardized pancreaticojejunostomy by double U-stitch technique in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomies","authors":"Jiang Liu ,&nbsp;Jie Hua ,&nbsp;Rong Tang ,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Double U-Stitch technique in open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted involving 180 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between November 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). The Double U-Stitch technique was applied in all cases and perioperative data were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All Double U-Stitch techniques were completed according to the standard, whether in the OPD group, LPD group, or RPD group. The average pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time was less than 25min (14.5min in the OPD group, 24.2min in the LPD group and 24.4min in the RPD group, P ​&lt; ​0.0001). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was 11.6% in OPD group and 9.5% in minimally invasive group (LPD ​+ ​RPD) (P ​&gt; ​0.05). There was a low incidence rate of postoperative complications which consisted of bile leak, intra-abdominal infection, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. There was no 90-day mortality observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Double U-Stitch technique demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy across different surgical approaches for PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Double U-Stitch technique in open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was conducted involving 180 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between November 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). The Double U-Stitch technique was applied in all cases and perioperative data were collected.

Results

All Double U-Stitch techniques were completed according to the standard, whether in the OPD group, LPD group, or RPD group. The average pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time was less than 25min (14.5min in the OPD group, 24.2min in the LPD group and 24.4min in the RPD group, P ​< ​0.0001). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was 11.6% in OPD group and 9.5% in minimally invasive group (LPD ​+ ​RPD) (P ​> ​0.05). There was a low incidence rate of postoperative complications which consisted of bile leak, intra-abdominal infection, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. There was no 90-day mortality observed.

Conclusion

The Double U-Stitch technique demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy across different surgical approaches for PD.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信