Predicting the structure-altering mechanisms of disease variants

IF 6.1 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Matteo Arnaudi , Mattia Utichi , Matteo Tiberti , Elena Papaleo
{"title":"Predicting the structure-altering mechanisms of disease variants","authors":"Matteo Arnaudi ,&nbsp;Mattia Utichi ,&nbsp;Matteo Tiberti ,&nbsp;Elena Papaleo","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.102994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Missense variants can affect the severity of disease, choice of treatment, and treatment outcomes. While the number of known variants has been increasing at a rapid pace, available evidence of their clinical effect has been lagging behind, constituting a challenge for clinicians and researchers. Multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) are important to close the gap; nonetheless, computational predictions of pathogenicity are still often the only available data for scoring variants. Such methods are not designed to provide a mechanistic explanation for the effect of amino acid substitutions. To this purpose, we propose structure-based frameworks as ensemble methodologies, with each method tailored to predict a different aspect among those exerted by amino acid substitutions to link predicted pathogenicity to mechanistic indicators. We review available frameworks, as well as advancements in underlying structure-based methods that predict variant effects on several protein features, such as protein stability, biomolecular interactions, allostery, post-translational modifications, and more.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102994"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Missense variants can affect the severity of disease, choice of treatment, and treatment outcomes. While the number of known variants has been increasing at a rapid pace, available evidence of their clinical effect has been lagging behind, constituting a challenge for clinicians and researchers. Multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) are important to close the gap; nonetheless, computational predictions of pathogenicity are still often the only available data for scoring variants. Such methods are not designed to provide a mechanistic explanation for the effect of amino acid substitutions. To this purpose, we propose structure-based frameworks as ensemble methodologies, with each method tailored to predict a different aspect among those exerted by amino acid substitutions to link predicted pathogenicity to mechanistic indicators. We review available frameworks, as well as advancements in underlying structure-based methods that predict variant effects on several protein features, such as protein stability, biomolecular interactions, allostery, post-translational modifications, and more.
预测疾病变异的结构改变机制
错义变异可影响疾病的严重程度、治疗的选择和治疗结果。虽然已知变异的数量一直在快速增加,但其临床效果的现有证据一直滞后,这对临床医生和研究人员构成了挑战。变异效应的多路分析(MAVEs)对于缩小差距非常重要;尽管如此,对致病性的计算预测仍然是对变异进行评分的唯一可用数据。这些方法的目的不是为氨基酸取代的作用提供一个机制上的解释。为此,我们提出了基于结构的框架作为集成方法,每种方法都适合于预测氨基酸取代所施加的不同方面,以将预测的致病性与机制指标联系起来。我们回顾了现有的框架,以及基于基础结构的方法的进展,这些方法预测了几种蛋白质特征的变异效应,如蛋白质稳定性、生物分子相互作用、变构、翻译后修饰等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in structural biology
Current opinion in structural biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
179
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed. In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form. 2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. [...] The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. -Folding and Binding- Nucleic acids and their protein complexes- Macromolecular Machines- Theory and Simulation- Sequences and Topology- New constructs and expression of proteins- Membranes- Engineering and Design- Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation- Biophysical and molecular biological methods- Multi-protein assemblies in signalling- Catalysis and Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信