Evaluation of the endocrine disrupting potential of Di-isononyl phthalate

IF 2.9 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
I.A. Lea , A.N. Buerger , D. Feifarek , A. Mihalchik , M.M. Heintz , L.C. Haws , H. Nyambego , K. Goyak , C. Palermo , S.J. Borghoff
{"title":"Evaluation of the endocrine disrupting potential of Di-isononyl phthalate","authors":"I.A. Lea ,&nbsp;A.N. Buerger ,&nbsp;D. Feifarek ,&nbsp;A. Mihalchik ,&nbsp;M.M. Heintz ,&nbsp;L.C. Haws ,&nbsp;H. Nyambego ,&nbsp;K. Goyak ,&nbsp;C. Palermo ,&nbsp;S.J. Borghoff","doi":"10.1016/j.crtox.2025.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low molecular weight <em>ortho</em>-phthalate compounds have been implicated in disruption of androgen pathways when exposure occurs during the masculinization programming window. Di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) is a high molecular weight phthalate and a high production volume chemical. To understand the potential for DINP and its metabolites to disrupt endocrine pathways, a weight of evidence assessment was conducted according to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)/ European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Endocrine Disruptor Guidance (2018). Toxicological data related to estrogen (E), androgen (A), thyroid (T), or steroidogenesis (S) pathways was assessed. Literature searches returned 110 articles from which data were extracted and assessed in conjunction with 105 high-throughput assays. An <em>in-silico</em> assessment of the EATS activity for DINP metabolites also was conducted. Based on the available evidence, DINP did not elicit thyroid- or estrogen-related apical outcomes <em>in vivo.</em> There were no studies evaluating thyroid hormone levels <em>in vivo</em> which, according to the ECHA/EFSA guidance, constitutes a data gap and prevents a conclusion being drawn on the T-pathway. The E, A, and S-pathways were sufficiently assessed to conclude on the endocrine disrupting potential of DINP. Based on the lack of apical outcomes, DINP did not disrupt the E-pathway. For the A and S-pathways, there was limited evidence to support adverse apical outcomes, so a mode of action assessment using a structured adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was performed. No biologically plausible link could be established between the key events in the hypothesized AOP that lead to adverse outcomes. Further, no dose or temporal concordance for A- and S-mediated findings were identified. Therefore, DINP does not meet the ECHA/EFSA criteria to be considered an endocrine disruptor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11236,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Toxicology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666027X25000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low molecular weight ortho-phthalate compounds have been implicated in disruption of androgen pathways when exposure occurs during the masculinization programming window. Di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) is a high molecular weight phthalate and a high production volume chemical. To understand the potential for DINP and its metabolites to disrupt endocrine pathways, a weight of evidence assessment was conducted according to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)/ European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Endocrine Disruptor Guidance (2018). Toxicological data related to estrogen (E), androgen (A), thyroid (T), or steroidogenesis (S) pathways was assessed. Literature searches returned 110 articles from which data were extracted and assessed in conjunction with 105 high-throughput assays. An in-silico assessment of the EATS activity for DINP metabolites also was conducted. Based on the available evidence, DINP did not elicit thyroid- or estrogen-related apical outcomes in vivo. There were no studies evaluating thyroid hormone levels in vivo which, according to the ECHA/EFSA guidance, constitutes a data gap and prevents a conclusion being drawn on the T-pathway. The E, A, and S-pathways were sufficiently assessed to conclude on the endocrine disrupting potential of DINP. Based on the lack of apical outcomes, DINP did not disrupt the E-pathway. For the A and S-pathways, there was limited evidence to support adverse apical outcomes, so a mode of action assessment using a structured adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was performed. No biologically plausible link could be established between the key events in the hypothesized AOP that lead to adverse outcomes. Further, no dose or temporal concordance for A- and S-mediated findings were identified. Therefore, DINP does not meet the ECHA/EFSA criteria to be considered an endocrine disruptor.

Abstract Image

邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯内分泌干扰潜能的评价
低分子量邻苯二甲酸酯化合物在男性化程序窗口期间暴露与雄激素途径的破坏有关。邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)是一种高分子量的邻苯二甲酸盐,是一种高产量的化学品。为了了解DINP及其代谢物破坏内分泌通路的可能性,根据欧洲化学品管理局(ECHA)/欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)内分泌干扰物指南(2018)进行了证据权重评估。评估了与雌激素(E)、雄激素(A)、甲状腺(T)或类固醇生成(S)途径相关的毒理学数据。文献检索返回110篇文章,从中提取数据并结合105项高通量分析进行评估。还进行了对DINP代谢物的EATS活性的计算机评估。根据现有证据,DINP在体内不会引起甲状腺或雌激素相关的根尖结果。没有研究评估体内甲状腺激素水平,根据ECHA/EFSA指南,这构成了数据缺口,并阻止了对t途径的结论。对E、A和s通路进行了充分评估,得出了DINP内分泌干扰潜力的结论。基于缺乏根尖结果,DINP没有破坏e通路。对于A和s通路,支持不良根尖结局的证据有限,因此采用结构化不良结局通路(AOP)框架进行行动评估模式。在假设的AOP中导致不良结果的关键事件之间,无法建立生物学上合理的联系。此外,没有确定A和s介导的结果的剂量或时间一致性。因此,DINP不符合ECHA/EFSA将其视为内分泌干扰物的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Toxicology
Current Research in Toxicology Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信