Critical damage modes in high-performance drilling of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composites

Kevin Kerrigan , Vaibhav A. Phadnis , Rachid M'Saoubi , Richard J. Scaife
{"title":"Critical damage modes in high-performance drilling of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composites","authors":"Kevin Kerrigan ,&nbsp;Vaibhav A. Phadnis ,&nbsp;Rachid M'Saoubi ,&nbsp;Richard J. Scaife","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing number of fibre deposition methods for composite structure enables highly tailored, high-performance architectures from one design intent to another. This raises the question, “How much should damage tolerances differ for one composite part design to another?” This initiates a framework for further exploration of the boundaries of acceptability, using a quantitative approach to assess the influence of process parameters on in-service performance. The framework is illustrated through a case study of a feature machined into a composite structure, namely a hole for part assembly. Mechanical and thermal hole defects were deliberately induced during dry drilling of quasi-isotropic pre-impregnated laminates. In-process forces and temperatures in combination with post-machining microscopy, X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy revealed micro-damage leading to isolated, global defects of delamination and thermal damage types. Comparisons with healthy, undamaged holes in static mechanical tests enabled quantitative assessment of the impact of different damage types on in-service performance, in this case compressive strength, of a composite part. High-speed drilling (52% faster) reduced strength (3.5%) due to hole geometry errors. Low-speed drilling (11.5x slower) increased strength (2%). Delamination (40% faster) reduced strength (2.5%). Future research should focus on defect implications, virtual defects and testing thereof, and in-situ monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"131 ","pages":"Pages 100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing number of fibre deposition methods for composite structure enables highly tailored, high-performance architectures from one design intent to another. This raises the question, “How much should damage tolerances differ for one composite part design to another?” This initiates a framework for further exploration of the boundaries of acceptability, using a quantitative approach to assess the influence of process parameters on in-service performance. The framework is illustrated through a case study of a feature machined into a composite structure, namely a hole for part assembly. Mechanical and thermal hole defects were deliberately induced during dry drilling of quasi-isotropic pre-impregnated laminates. In-process forces and temperatures in combination with post-machining microscopy, X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy revealed micro-damage leading to isolated, global defects of delamination and thermal damage types. Comparisons with healthy, undamaged holes in static mechanical tests enabled quantitative assessment of the impact of different damage types on in-service performance, in this case compressive strength, of a composite part. High-speed drilling (52% faster) reduced strength (3.5%) due to hole geometry errors. Low-speed drilling (11.5x slower) increased strength (2%). Delamination (40% faster) reduced strength (2.5%). Future research should focus on defect implications, virtual defects and testing thereof, and in-situ monitoring.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信