An extended simple additive weighting decision support system with application in the food industry

Peyman Zandi , Mehdi Ajalli , Narges Soleiman Ekhtiyati
{"title":"An extended simple additive weighting decision support system with application in the food industry","authors":"Peyman Zandi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Ajalli ,&nbsp;Narges Soleiman Ekhtiyati","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to expand the application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique based on expanded information on the alternatives from sub-alternatives. For this purpose, some initial information is collected at the sub-alternative level. Then, based on the scores obtained for the sub-alternative level, the main alternatives are ranked using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The goal is to analyze decision alternatives and sub-alternatives, rank the alternatives according to criteria and sub-criteria, and analyze sensitivity based on their criteria and weights. A program is developed in MS Excel to dynamically explore a large amount of information. The results confirm the designed model’s ability to rank all alternatives and sub-alternatives. The model has been used to rank 220 products and 12 product portfolios in a food industry company. Five categories of decision criteria, including production, procurement, finance, product and sales, and competitors, were selected with 36 quantitative and qualitative sub-criteria. The results show that the market indicators and competitors directly impact the product portfolio’s priority. Some of the contributions of this research can be considered as a method for ranking alternatives based on the expanded information from sub-alternatives. As a management tool, the proposed model can be used in other fields and with different techniques to manage the portfolio of alternatives and sub-alternatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to expand the application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique based on expanded information on the alternatives from sub-alternatives. For this purpose, some initial information is collected at the sub-alternative level. Then, based on the scores obtained for the sub-alternative level, the main alternatives are ranked using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The goal is to analyze decision alternatives and sub-alternatives, rank the alternatives according to criteria and sub-criteria, and analyze sensitivity based on their criteria and weights. A program is developed in MS Excel to dynamically explore a large amount of information. The results confirm the designed model’s ability to rank all alternatives and sub-alternatives. The model has been used to rank 220 products and 12 product portfolios in a food industry company. Five categories of decision criteria, including production, procurement, finance, product and sales, and competitors, were selected with 36 quantitative and qualitative sub-criteria. The results show that the market indicators and competitors directly impact the product portfolio’s priority. Some of the contributions of this research can be considered as a method for ranking alternatives based on the expanded information from sub-alternatives. As a management tool, the proposed model can be used in other fields and with different techniques to manage the portfolio of alternatives and sub-alternatives.
扩展的简单添加剂加权决策支持系统在食品工业中的应用
本研究旨在扩展基于子方案信息的多准则决策(MCDM)技术的应用。为此目的,在次备选级别收集一些初始信息。然后,根据获得的次备选水平得分,使用简单加性加权(SAW)方法对主要备选进行排序。目标是分析决策备选方案和子备选方案,根据标准和子标准对备选方案进行排序,并根据其标准和权重分析灵敏度。在MS Excel中开发了一个程序来动态地挖掘大量的信息。结果证实了所设计模型对所有方案和子方案进行排序的能力。该模型已被用于对一家食品工业公司的220种产品和12种产品组合进行排名。决策标准包括生产、采购、财务、产品和销售、竞争对手等5个类别,其中有36个定量和定性的子标准。结果表明,市场指标和竞争对手直接影响产品组合的优先级。本研究的一些贡献可以被认为是一种基于子方案扩展信息的方案排序方法。作为一种管理工具,所提出的模型可以在其他领域使用不同的技术来管理备选方案和子备选方案的投资组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信