Forgone Care of doctor's visits in Germany – Results from three cross-sectional surveys

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christine Haeger , Raphael Kohl , Julie L. O'Sullivan , Susanne Schnitzer
{"title":"Forgone Care of doctor's visits in Germany – Results from three cross-sectional surveys","authors":"Christine Haeger ,&nbsp;Raphael Kohl ,&nbsp;Julie L. O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Susanne Schnitzer","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Forgone care, defined as not using health care despite needing it, leads to adverse outcomes such as increased emergency care use. Our study uses data from German representative surveys (2016, 2021, 2022) to examine the frequency, demographics, and reasons for forgone care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Multiple logistic regression models of individual cohorts and pooled data were used to assess the likelihood of forgoing a doctor's visit. Reasons for forgone care were analyzed descriptively and further clustered in different types of barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 10,122 participants, 21 % reported forgone care in the past year: 22 % in 2016, 18 % in 2021, and 20 % in 2022. The likelihood of forgone care is highest among women (OR: 1.22 [1.09; 1.37]) and younger adults aged 18–44 years (OR: 1.19 [1.05; 1.34]), whereas participants in partnerships were less likely to forgo care (OR: 0.77 [0.69; 0.87]). Barriers were categorized as systemic (e.g. waiting time; 39 %), psychological (e.g. fear of diagnosis; 22 %), and physical (e.g. difficulty reaching the doctor; 19 %). Younger adults and members of the workforce cited systemic barriers most often, whereas older adults (65+) cited psychological and physical barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Targeted interventions for vulnerable groups are needed that reduce barriers for forgone care. Recommendations include more accessible doctor's offices, improved appointment systems, expanded telemedicine, and flexible hours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 105273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Forgone care, defined as not using health care despite needing it, leads to adverse outcomes such as increased emergency care use. Our study uses data from German representative surveys (2016, 2021, 2022) to examine the frequency, demographics, and reasons for forgone care.

Methods

Multiple logistic regression models of individual cohorts and pooled data were used to assess the likelihood of forgoing a doctor's visit. Reasons for forgone care were analyzed descriptively and further clustered in different types of barriers.

Results

Of 10,122 participants, 21 % reported forgone care in the past year: 22 % in 2016, 18 % in 2021, and 20 % in 2022. The likelihood of forgone care is highest among women (OR: 1.22 [1.09; 1.37]) and younger adults aged 18–44 years (OR: 1.19 [1.05; 1.34]), whereas participants in partnerships were less likely to forgo care (OR: 0.77 [0.69; 0.87]). Barriers were categorized as systemic (e.g. waiting time; 39 %), psychological (e.g. fear of diagnosis; 22 %), and physical (e.g. difficulty reaching the doctor; 19 %). Younger adults and members of the workforce cited systemic barriers most often, whereas older adults (65+) cited psychological and physical barriers.

Discussion

Targeted interventions for vulnerable groups are needed that reduce barriers for forgone care. Recommendations include more accessible doctor's offices, improved appointment systems, expanded telemedicine, and flexible hours.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信