Advancing the Sensitivity Frontier in digital contact tracing: Comparative analysis of proposed methods toward maximized utility

Q1 Medicine
Junko Ami , Yanbo Pang , Hiroshi Masui , Takashi Okumura , Yoshihide Sekimoto
{"title":"Advancing the Sensitivity Frontier in digital contact tracing: Comparative analysis of proposed methods toward maximized utility","authors":"Junko Ami ,&nbsp;Yanbo Pang ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Masui ,&nbsp;Takashi Okumura ,&nbsp;Yoshihide Sekimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.imu.2025.101622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted Digital Contact Tracing (DCT) technology to control infections. However, the widely-used Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based DCT requires both the infected individual and the contact to have the application activated to detect exposure. Forcing citizens to install the DCT application could compromise their privacy. Therefore, to make DCT a truly usable tool, it is crucial to develop a DCT system that possesses high sensitivity, without depending on the application usage rate.</div><div>The Computation of Infection Risk via Confidential Locational Entries (CIRCLE) is a DCT method that utilizes connection logs from mobile phone base stations, theoretically offering much higher sensitivity than BLE-based DCT. However, its real performance has not been proven, and thus, this paper estimates the sensitivity and specificity of both BLE-based DCT and CIRCLE in a comparative setting. The estimation combines simulated movement patterns of residents with real-world data from app usage in Japan, utilizing both simulation and numerical modeling, with missing data supplemented through sensitivity analysis.</div><div>The sensitivity of BLE-based DCT is severely limited by the application’s usage rate, with an estimated baseline of just 10.9%, and even under highly optimistic assumptions, it only reaches 27.0%. In contrast, CIRCLE demonstrated a significantly higher sensitivity of 85.6%, greatly surpassing BLE-based DCT. The specificity of CIRCLE, though, decreased as the number of infected individuals increased, dropping to less than half of BLE-based DCT’s specificity during widespread infection. The BLE-based DCT used during the pandemic suffers from low sensitivity. While CIRCLE has specificity challenges, it provides exceptionally high sensitivity. Integrating these methods could redefine the design of digital contact tracing, leading to better utility for future infection control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13953,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914825000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted Digital Contact Tracing (DCT) technology to control infections. However, the widely-used Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)-based DCT requires both the infected individual and the contact to have the application activated to detect exposure. Forcing citizens to install the DCT application could compromise their privacy. Therefore, to make DCT a truly usable tool, it is crucial to develop a DCT system that possesses high sensitivity, without depending on the application usage rate.
The Computation of Infection Risk via Confidential Locational Entries (CIRCLE) is a DCT method that utilizes connection logs from mobile phone base stations, theoretically offering much higher sensitivity than BLE-based DCT. However, its real performance has not been proven, and thus, this paper estimates the sensitivity and specificity of both BLE-based DCT and CIRCLE in a comparative setting. The estimation combines simulated movement patterns of residents with real-world data from app usage in Japan, utilizing both simulation and numerical modeling, with missing data supplemented through sensitivity analysis.
The sensitivity of BLE-based DCT is severely limited by the application’s usage rate, with an estimated baseline of just 10.9%, and even under highly optimistic assumptions, it only reaches 27.0%. In contrast, CIRCLE demonstrated a significantly higher sensitivity of 85.6%, greatly surpassing BLE-based DCT. The specificity of CIRCLE, though, decreased as the number of infected individuals increased, dropping to less than half of BLE-based DCT’s specificity during widespread infection. The BLE-based DCT used during the pandemic suffers from low sensitivity. While CIRCLE has specificity challenges, it provides exceptionally high sensitivity. Integrating these methods could redefine the design of digital contact tracing, leading to better utility for future infection control.

Abstract Image

推进数字接触追踪的灵敏度前沿:实现效用最大化的方法比较分析
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多国家采用了数字接触者追踪技术来控制感染。然而,广泛使用的基于蓝牙低功耗(BLE)的DCT需要被感染者和接触者都激活应用程序以检测暴露。强迫公民安装DCT应用程序可能会损害他们的隐私。因此,为了使DCT成为真正可用的工具,开发一种不依赖于应用使用率的高灵敏度DCT系统至关重要。通过保密位置条目计算感染风险(CIRCLE)是一种利用移动电话基站连接日志的DCT方法,理论上比基于ble的DCT灵敏度高得多。然而,其实际性能尚未得到证实,因此,本文在比较设置中估计了基于ble的DCT和CIRCLE的敏感性和特异性。该估计将模拟居民的移动模式与日本应用程序使用的真实数据相结合,利用模拟和数值建模,并通过敏感性分析补充缺失数据。基于ble的DCT的灵敏度受到应用程序使用率的严重限制,估计基线仅为10.9%,即使在非常乐观的假设下,它也只能达到27.0%。相比之下,CIRCLE的灵敏度为85.6%,大大超过了基于ble的DCT。然而,CIRCLE的特异性随着感染人数的增加而下降,在广泛感染期间降至不到基于ble的DCT特异性的一半。大流行期间使用的基于ble的DCT灵敏度较低。虽然CIRCLE在特异性方面存在挑战,但它提供了异常高的灵敏度。整合这些方法可以重新定义数字接触者追踪的设计,从而为未来的感染控制带来更好的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
282
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (IMU) is an international gold open access journal covering a broad spectrum of topics within medical informatics, including (but not limited to) papers focusing on imaging, pathology, teledermatology, public health, ophthalmological, nursing and translational medicine informatics. The full papers that are published in the journal are accessible to all who visit the website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信