The New CMS Measure of Excessive Radiation Dose or Inadequate Image Quality in CT: Issues and Ambiguities-Perspectives from an AAPM-Commissioned Panel.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jered R Wells, Olav Christianson, Dustin Gress, Eric Gingold, Jurgen Jacobs, Kirsten Boedeker, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Lifeng Yu, Michael McNitt-Gray, Ehsan Samei
{"title":"The New CMS Measure of Excessive Radiation Dose or Inadequate Image Quality in CT: Issues and Ambiguities-Perspectives from an AAPM-Commissioned Panel.","authors":"Jered R Wells, Olav Christianson, Dustin Gress, Eric Gingold, Jurgen Jacobs, Kirsten Boedeker, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Lifeng Yu, Michael McNitt-Gray, Ehsan Samei","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.32458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CMS has adopted a new CT quality measure seeking to discourage excessive radiation dose while preserving image quality. The measure score is expressed as the percentage of qualifying studies that exceed predetermined thresholds indicating inadequate image quality (based on image noise) or excessive radiation dose. The measure has been incorporated into the major CMS quality-based payment programs, impacting hospitals and clinician payments; measure reporting began in January 2025. Following measure development, practitioners identified a spectrum of concerns and impediments, prompting the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to convene a multidisciplinary expert panel to provide further guidance. The panel identified 20 issues and ambiguities in the measure specifications, stemming from metrology concerns, unconventional terminology, and inconsistencies with practice standards or norms, while relating to themes of applicability, categories and metrics, informatics, performance expectations, and meta considerations. In this article, the panel presents these issues and ambiguities with associated recommendations to promote the measure's intentions. These recommendations include greater data access (e.g., to the measure's source data and to reporting elements for audit support) and a more holistic treatment of image quality. The panel ultimately urges a shift toward open-source, open-access, consensus-based, and community-owned strategies to ensure CT quality and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.32458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CMS has adopted a new CT quality measure seeking to discourage excessive radiation dose while preserving image quality. The measure score is expressed as the percentage of qualifying studies that exceed predetermined thresholds indicating inadequate image quality (based on image noise) or excessive radiation dose. The measure has been incorporated into the major CMS quality-based payment programs, impacting hospitals and clinician payments; measure reporting began in January 2025. Following measure development, practitioners identified a spectrum of concerns and impediments, prompting the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to convene a multidisciplinary expert panel to provide further guidance. The panel identified 20 issues and ambiguities in the measure specifications, stemming from metrology concerns, unconventional terminology, and inconsistencies with practice standards or norms, while relating to themes of applicability, categories and metrics, informatics, performance expectations, and meta considerations. In this article, the panel presents these issues and ambiguities with associated recommendations to promote the measure's intentions. These recommendations include greater data access (e.g., to the measure's source data and to reporting elements for audit support) and a more holistic treatment of image quality. The panel ultimately urges a shift toward open-source, open-access, consensus-based, and community-owned strategies to ensure CT quality and safety.

CMS 采用了一项新的 CT 质量测量方法,旨在阻止辐射剂量过大,同时保持图像质量。测量得分表示为超过预定阈值的合格研究的百分比,表明图像质量不佳(基于图像噪声)或辐射剂量过大。该指标已被纳入 CMS 的主要质量付费计划,对医院和临床医生的付费产生影响;该指标报告始于 2025 年 1 月。措施制定后,从业人员发现了一系列问题和障碍,促使美国医学物理学家协会召集了一个多学科专家小组提供进一步指导。专家小组在测量规范中发现了 20 个问题和含糊之处,这些问题和含糊之处来自计量学、非传统术语以及与实践标准或规范的不一致,同时还涉及适用性、类别和度量、信息学、性能预期和元考虑等主题。在本文中,专家小组介绍了这些问题和模糊之处,并提出了相关建议,以促进衡量标准意图的实现。这些建议包括更广泛的数据访问(例如,访问测量的源数据和用于审计支持的报告元素)以及更全面地处理图像质量。专家组最终敦促向开源、开放、基于共识和社区自主的策略转变,以确保 CT 质量和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信