The New CMS Measure of Excessive Radiation Dose or Inadequate Image Quality in CT: Issues and Ambiguities-Perspectives from an AAPM-Commissioned Panel.
IF 4.7 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jered R Wells, Olav Christianson, Dustin Gress, Eric Gingold, Jurgen Jacobs, Kirsten Boedeker, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Lifeng Yu, Michael McNitt-Gray, Ehsan Samei
{"title":"The New CMS Measure of Excessive Radiation Dose or Inadequate Image Quality in CT: Issues and Ambiguities-Perspectives from an AAPM-Commissioned Panel.","authors":"Jered R Wells, Olav Christianson, Dustin Gress, Eric Gingold, Jurgen Jacobs, Kirsten Boedeker, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Lifeng Yu, Michael McNitt-Gray, Ehsan Samei","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.32458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CMS has adopted a new CT quality measure seeking to discourage excessive radiation dose while preserving image quality. The measure score is expressed as the percentage of qualifying studies that exceed predetermined thresholds indicating inadequate image quality (based on image noise) or excessive radiation dose. The measure has been incorporated into the major CMS quality-based payment programs, impacting hospitals and clinician payments; measure reporting began in January 2025. Following measure development, practitioners identified a spectrum of concerns and impediments, prompting the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to convene a multidisciplinary expert panel to provide further guidance. The panel identified 20 issues and ambiguities in the measure specifications, stemming from metrology concerns, unconventional terminology, and inconsistencies with practice standards or norms, while relating to themes of applicability, categories and metrics, informatics, performance expectations, and meta considerations. In this article, the panel presents these issues and ambiguities with associated recommendations to promote the measure's intentions. These recommendations include greater data access (e.g., to the measure's source data and to reporting elements for audit support) and a more holistic treatment of image quality. The panel ultimately urges a shift toward open-source, open-access, consensus-based, and community-owned strategies to ensure CT quality and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.32458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CMS has adopted a new CT quality measure seeking to discourage excessive radiation dose while preserving image quality. The measure score is expressed as the percentage of qualifying studies that exceed predetermined thresholds indicating inadequate image quality (based on image noise) or excessive radiation dose. The measure has been incorporated into the major CMS quality-based payment programs, impacting hospitals and clinician payments; measure reporting began in January 2025. Following measure development, practitioners identified a spectrum of concerns and impediments, prompting the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to convene a multidisciplinary expert panel to provide further guidance. The panel identified 20 issues and ambiguities in the measure specifications, stemming from metrology concerns, unconventional terminology, and inconsistencies with practice standards or norms, while relating to themes of applicability, categories and metrics, informatics, performance expectations, and meta considerations. In this article, the panel presents these issues and ambiguities with associated recommendations to promote the measure's intentions. These recommendations include greater data access (e.g., to the measure's source data and to reporting elements for audit support) and a more holistic treatment of image quality. The panel ultimately urges a shift toward open-source, open-access, consensus-based, and community-owned strategies to ensure CT quality and safety.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.