Mandeep Singh, Paul A Friedman, Rajiv Gulati, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Bradley R Lewis, Amrit Kanwar, Claire E Raphael, Mohammed A Al-Hijji, Zachi I Attia, Atta Behfar, James L Kirkland
{"title":"Role of Biological Age in the Determination of Long-Term Cause-Specific Death Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.","authors":"Mandeep Singh, Paul A Friedman, Rajiv Gulati, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Bradley R Lewis, Amrit Kanwar, Claire E Raphael, Mohammed A Al-Hijji, Zachi I Attia, Atta Behfar, James L Kirkland","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested whether biologic age, as estimated by deficits, functional impairments, or Age-Gap or their combination, provide improved estimation of cause-specific death as compared with chronological age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap were prospectively collected in 535 patients aged ≥55 years undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions between August 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018. Age-Gap was calculated as the difference between chronological age and age estimated by artificial intelligence ECG using a convolutional neural network. The full biological age model included deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap >2 SD. A multivariable reduced model with the least number of variables was also created to provide a comparable C index to the full model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average chronological age was 72.1±9.5 years, and there were 68% of men. During a median follow-up of 2.61 years, 124 (23%) patients died. There was a modest correlation between Age-Gap and biological age (<i>r</i>=0.28 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; <i>P</i><0.001). When modeled with chronologic age as a covariate, Age-Gap predicted all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; <i>P</i><0.001) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; <i>P</i><0.001) mortality. As compared with chronological age, the full biological age model noted significant improvement in the prediction of long-term overall (95% CI, 0.65-0.78), cardiovascular (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and noncardiovascular (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) mortality. In the reduced models, most prognostic information for noncardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.79) was obtained by subjective difficulty in performing tasks, whereas the deficit-based estimation predicted cardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estimated biological age from deficits and functional impairments was superior to chronological age in predicting long-term cause-specific mortality following percutaneous coronary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We tested whether biologic age, as estimated by deficits, functional impairments, or Age-Gap or their combination, provide improved estimation of cause-specific death as compared with chronological age.
Methods: Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap were prospectively collected in 535 patients aged ≥55 years undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions between August 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018. Age-Gap was calculated as the difference between chronological age and age estimated by artificial intelligence ECG using a convolutional neural network. The full biological age model included deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap >2 SD. A multivariable reduced model with the least number of variables was also created to provide a comparable C index to the full model.
Results: The average chronological age was 72.1±9.5 years, and there were 68% of men. During a median follow-up of 2.61 years, 124 (23%) patients died. There was a modest correlation between Age-Gap and biological age (r=0.28 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; P<0.001). When modeled with chronologic age as a covariate, Age-Gap predicted all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; P<0.001) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; P<0.001) mortality. As compared with chronological age, the full biological age model noted significant improvement in the prediction of long-term overall (95% CI, 0.65-0.78), cardiovascular (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and noncardiovascular (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) mortality. In the reduced models, most prognostic information for noncardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.79) was obtained by subjective difficulty in performing tasks, whereas the deficit-based estimation predicted cardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.72).
Conclusions: Estimated biological age from deficits and functional impairments was superior to chronological age in predicting long-term cause-specific mortality following percutaneous coronary interventions.
期刊介绍:
As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.