Role of Biological Age in the Determination of Long-Term Cause-Specific Death Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mandeep Singh, Paul A Friedman, Rajiv Gulati, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Bradley R Lewis, Amrit Kanwar, Claire E Raphael, Mohammed A Al-Hijji, Zachi I Attia, Atta Behfar, James L Kirkland
{"title":"Role of Biological Age in the Determination of Long-Term Cause-Specific Death Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.","authors":"Mandeep Singh, Paul A Friedman, Rajiv Gulati, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Bradley R Lewis, Amrit Kanwar, Claire E Raphael, Mohammed A Al-Hijji, Zachi I Attia, Atta Behfar, James L Kirkland","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested whether biologic age, as estimated by deficits, functional impairments, or Age-Gap or their combination, provide improved estimation of cause-specific death as compared with chronological age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap were prospectively collected in 535 patients aged ≥55 years undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions between August 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018. Age-Gap was calculated as the difference between chronological age and age estimated by artificial intelligence ECG using a convolutional neural network. The full biological age model included deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap >2 SD. A multivariable reduced model with the least number of variables was also created to provide a comparable C index to the full model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average chronological age was 72.1±9.5 years, and there were 68% of men. During a median follow-up of 2.61 years, 124 (23%) patients died. There was a modest correlation between Age-Gap and biological age (<i>r</i>=0.28 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; <i>P</i><0.001). When modeled with chronologic age as a covariate, Age-Gap predicted all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; <i>P</i><0.001) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; <i>P</i><0.001) mortality. As compared with chronological age, the full biological age model noted significant improvement in the prediction of long-term overall (95% CI, 0.65-0.78), cardiovascular (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and noncardiovascular (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) mortality. In the reduced models, most prognostic information for noncardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.79) was obtained by subjective difficulty in performing tasks, whereas the deficit-based estimation predicted cardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estimated biological age from deficits and functional impairments was superior to chronological age in predicting long-term cause-specific mortality following percutaneous coronary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036876"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We tested whether biologic age, as estimated by deficits, functional impairments, or Age-Gap or their combination, provide improved estimation of cause-specific death as compared with chronological age.

Methods: Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap were prospectively collected in 535 patients aged ≥55 years undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions between August 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018. Age-Gap was calculated as the difference between chronological age and age estimated by artificial intelligence ECG using a convolutional neural network. The full biological age model included deficits, functional impairments, and Age-Gap >2 SD. A multivariable reduced model with the least number of variables was also created to provide a comparable C index to the full model.

Results: The average chronological age was 72.1±9.5 years, and there were 68% of men. During a median follow-up of 2.61 years, 124 (23%) patients died. There was a modest correlation between Age-Gap and biological age (r=0.28 [95% CI, 0.20-0.35]; P<0.001). When modeled with chronologic age as a covariate, Age-Gap predicted all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; P<0.001) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; P<0.001) mortality. As compared with chronological age, the full biological age model noted significant improvement in the prediction of long-term overall (95% CI, 0.65-0.78), cardiovascular (95% CI, 0.69-0.77), and noncardiovascular (95% CI, 0.55-0.86) mortality. In the reduced models, most prognostic information for noncardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.79) was obtained by subjective difficulty in performing tasks, whereas the deficit-based estimation predicted cardiovascular mortality (C index: 0.72).

Conclusions: Estimated biological age from deficits and functional impairments was superior to chronological age in predicting long-term cause-specific mortality following percutaneous coronary interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信