Impact of Minimal Residual Diseases Status and Depth of Response on Survival Outcomes in Blinatumomab-Treated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Impact of Minimal Residual Diseases Status and Depth of Response on Survival Outcomes in Blinatumomab-Treated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abdur Jamil, Zaheer Qureshi, Rida Riaz, Hamzah Akram, Rohma Jamil, Asim Kichloo, Insija Ilyas Selene","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a common hematological malignancy that occurs due to blockage of B-lymphocyte maturation at an early stage of development and differentiation. The Food and Drug Administration approved blinotumomab to manage relapsed/refractory ALL (R/R ALL). This review aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of blinatumomab in treating R/R ALL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers searched 3 electronic databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL, for all relevant articles published until July 2024. All the articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred thirty-seven articles were found from the electronic search; however, only 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. A pooled analysis of the outcomes found that blinatumomab resulted in an improvement in both the OS (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.82; P=0.0003) and the DFS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.80; P=0.001). Further analysis showed that the CR rate and MRD response of ALL patients to blinatumomab was 51.6% (95% CI: 48.5%, 54.6%; P=0.319) and 64.6% (95% CI: 53.4%, 74.3%; P=0.011), respectively. The safety analysis indicated that the incidence of serious AEs was comparable in patients receiving blinotumomab and those receiving standard chemotherapy (OR: 1.34; 95% CI; 0.91, 1.97; P=0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show that blinatumomab is superior to standard chemotherapy in improving the OS and DFS of patients with R/R ALL. Furthermore, it has a more favorable safety profile, making it an effective alternative to conventional chemotherapy for managing R/R ALL.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a common hematological malignancy that occurs due to blockage of B-lymphocyte maturation at an early stage of development and differentiation. The Food and Drug Administration approved blinotumomab to manage relapsed/refractory ALL (R/R ALL). This review aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of blinatumomab in treating R/R ALL.
Methods: Two reviewers searched 3 electronic databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and CENTRAL, for all relevant articles published until July 2024. All the articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review.
Results: Four hundred thirty-seven articles were found from the electronic search; however, only 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. A pooled analysis of the outcomes found that blinatumomab resulted in an improvement in both the OS (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.82; P=0.0003) and the DFS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.80; P=0.001). Further analysis showed that the CR rate and MRD response of ALL patients to blinatumomab was 51.6% (95% CI: 48.5%, 54.6%; P=0.319) and 64.6% (95% CI: 53.4%, 74.3%; P=0.011), respectively. The safety analysis indicated that the incidence of serious AEs was comparable in patients receiving blinotumomab and those receiving standard chemotherapy (OR: 1.34; 95% CI; 0.91, 1.97; P=0.14).
Conclusions: The findings show that blinatumomab is superior to standard chemotherapy in improving the OS and DFS of patients with R/R ALL. Furthermore, it has a more favorable safety profile, making it an effective alternative to conventional chemotherapy for managing R/R ALL.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists.
The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles.
The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.