Effects of Nursing Interventions on Improving Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Wei Geng, Hongping Jia, Xianjing Zeng, Jia Li
{"title":"Effects of Nursing Interventions on Improving Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wei Geng, Hongping Jia, Xianjing Zeng, Jia Li","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Various nursing interventions can improve the treatment process of patients with heart failure. However, the effectiveness of these interventions can be different. Therefore, it is required to summarize these relationships. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of various types of nursing interventions on improving patients with heart failure. <b>Methods:</b> Two groups of keywords were searched in five databases. After removing irrelevant articles, the required information was extracted from the remaining papers. Also, the quality level of the papers was determined using the critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. In addition to the descriptive findings, a case-control meta-analysis was also conducted on the values of compliance and satisfaction rates reported in some studies. <b>Results:</b> Forty-nine papers were included in the study. The results of all studies showed that various types of nursing can effectively influence the improvement of patients with heart failure. Among these interventions, comprehensive nursing, evidence-based nursing, and continuous nursing had the highest effectiveness. However, motivational interventions, telephone interventions, educational nursing interventions, and self-care interventions despite low cost could influence patient improvement. The results showed that nursing intervention in the case group compared with the control group could significantly decrease the complication rate (-11.22 [95% CI: -13.56, -8.87]) and increase the satisfaction rate (2.46 [95% CI: 1.79, 3.12]) in the patients. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> It is recommended that a set of nursing intervention measures can significantly improve the physical and mental conditions of patients with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Various nursing interventions can improve the treatment process of patients with heart failure. However, the effectiveness of these interventions can be different. Therefore, it is required to summarize these relationships. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of various types of nursing interventions on improving patients with heart failure. Methods: Two groups of keywords were searched in five databases. After removing irrelevant articles, the required information was extracted from the remaining papers. Also, the quality level of the papers was determined using the critical appraisal tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. In addition to the descriptive findings, a case-control meta-analysis was also conducted on the values of compliance and satisfaction rates reported in some studies. Results: Forty-nine papers were included in the study. The results of all studies showed that various types of nursing can effectively influence the improvement of patients with heart failure. Among these interventions, comprehensive nursing, evidence-based nursing, and continuous nursing had the highest effectiveness. However, motivational interventions, telephone interventions, educational nursing interventions, and self-care interventions despite low cost could influence patient improvement. The results showed that nursing intervention in the case group compared with the control group could significantly decrease the complication rate (-11.22 [95% CI: -13.56, -8.87]) and increase the satisfaction rate (2.46 [95% CI: 1.79, 3.12]) in the patients. Implications for Practice: It is recommended that a set of nursing intervention measures can significantly improve the physical and mental conditions of patients with heart failure.

护理干预对改善心力衰竭患者的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景与目的:各种护理干预可以改善心力衰竭患者的治疗过程。然而,这些干预措施的有效性可能是不同的。因此,需要对这些关系进行总结。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨不同类型的护理干预对改善心力衰竭患者的影响。方法:在5个数据库中检索两组关键词。在删除不相关的文章后,从剩余的论文中提取所需的信息。此外,论文的质量水平是由乔安娜布里格斯研究所提供的关键评估工具确定的。除了描述性发现外,还对一些研究报告的依从性和满意度进行了病例对照荟萃分析。结果:共纳入49篇论文。所有的研究结果都表明,各种类型的护理可以有效地影响心力衰竭患者的改善。干预措施中,综合护理、循证护理和持续护理效果最高。然而,动机干预、电话干预、教育护理干预和自我护理干预,尽管成本较低,但可以影响患者的改善。结果显示,与对照组相比,病例组护理干预可显著降低患者并发症发生率(-11.22 [95% CI: -13.56, -8.87]),提高患者满意度(2.46 [95% CI: 1.79, 3.12])。实践意义:建议一套护理干预措施可以显著改善心衰患者的身心状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信