Belkacem Acidi, Matthieu Faron, Olivier Mir, Antonin Levy, Mohammed Ghallab, Ines Kasraoui, Benjamin Verret, Cecile Le Péchoux, Raslislav Bahleda, Andrea Cavalcanti, Axel Le Cesne, Charles Honoré
{"title":"Contraindication to surgery in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: Retrospective series on 20years of practice in a high-volume sarcoma center.","authors":"Belkacem Acidi, Matthieu Faron, Olivier Mir, Antonin Levy, Mohammed Ghallab, Ines Kasraoui, Benjamin Verret, Cecile Le Péchoux, Raslislav Bahleda, Andrea Cavalcanti, Axel Le Cesne, Charles Honoré","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgery is the cornerstone treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). However, contraindications for unresectability are not well-documented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study aims to identify contraindications that prevent surgery for primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated for primary RPS at our center from 1995 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 452 patients treated for primary RPS, 92 (20%) were not offered surgery. The reasons for unresectability were categorized as follows: poor general health or severe comorbidities in 39 patients (42%), preoperative detection of distant metastases in 33 patients (36%), and locally advanced disease in 20 patients (22%). Locally advanced disease included vascular involvement in 14 patients (15%) and vertebral invasion in 6 patients (7%). Among the non-operated patients, 66% received chemotherapy, 16% received radiotherapy, and 5% received combined treatments. The median progression-free survival was 7months, and the median overall survival was 18months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contraindications for surgery in patients with primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center are not uncommon. The next step should be to differentiate absolute from relative (i.e., preoperative modifiable factors) contraindications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2025.01.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Surgery is the cornerstone treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). However, contraindications for unresectability are not well-documented in the literature.
Aim of the study: This study aims to identify contraindications that prevent surgery for primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients treated for primary RPS at our center from 1995 to 2021.
Results: Among the 452 patients treated for primary RPS, 92 (20%) were not offered surgery. The reasons for unresectability were categorized as follows: poor general health or severe comorbidities in 39 patients (42%), preoperative detection of distant metastases in 33 patients (36%), and locally advanced disease in 20 patients (22%). Locally advanced disease included vascular involvement in 14 patients (15%) and vertebral invasion in 6 patients (7%). Among the non-operated patients, 66% received chemotherapy, 16% received radiotherapy, and 5% received combined treatments. The median progression-free survival was 7months, and the median overall survival was 18months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 53%.
Conclusion: Contraindications for surgery in patients with primary RPS in a high-volume sarcoma center are not uncommon. The next step should be to differentiate absolute from relative (i.e., preoperative modifiable factors) contraindications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization.
JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.