Monitoring mortality in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic control in Victoria, Australia: a time series analysis of population data.

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.01.1091
Lalitha Sundaresan, Sheena G Sullivan, David J Muscatello, Daneeta Hennessy, Stacey L Rowe
{"title":"Monitoring mortality in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic control in Victoria, Australia: a time series analysis of population data.","authors":"Lalitha Sundaresan, Sheena G Sullivan, David J Muscatello, Daneeta Hennessy, Stacey L Rowe","doi":"10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.01.1091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mortality surveillance was established in the state of Victoria just before the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we describe the establishment of this surveillance system, justify the modelling approach selected, and provide examples of how the interpretation of changes in mortality rates during the pandemic was influenced by the model chosen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Registered deaths occurring in Victoria from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020 were sourced from the Victoria Death Index. Observed mortality rates were compared to a raw historical 5-year mean and to predicted means estimated from a seasonal robust regression. Differences between the observed mortality rate and the historical mean (∆MR) and excess mortality rate from the observed and predicted rates were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20 375 COVID-19 cases notified in Victoria as of 31 December 2020, of whom 748 (3.7%) died. Victorians aged ≥ 85 years experienced the highest case fatality ratio (34%). Mean observed mortality rates in 2020 (MR: 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4, 11.9) were slightly reduced when compared with the annual rate expected using the historical mean method (mean MR: 12.2; 95% CI: 12.1-12.3; ∆MR: -0.57; 95% CI: -0.77, -0.38), but not from the rate expected using the robust regression (estimated MR: 11.7; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 11.5, 11.9; EMR: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.16). The two methods yielded opposing interpretations for some causes, including cardiovascular and cancer mortality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interpretation of how pandemic restrictions impacted mortality in Victoria in 2020 is influenced by the method of estimation. Time-series approaches are preferential because they account for population trends in mortality over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":31512,"journal":{"name":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2025.16.01.1091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mortality surveillance was established in the state of Victoria just before the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we describe the establishment of this surveillance system, justify the modelling approach selected, and provide examples of how the interpretation of changes in mortality rates during the pandemic was influenced by the model chosen.

Methods: Registered deaths occurring in Victoria from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020 were sourced from the Victoria Death Index. Observed mortality rates were compared to a raw historical 5-year mean and to predicted means estimated from a seasonal robust regression. Differences between the observed mortality rate and the historical mean (∆MR) and excess mortality rate from the observed and predicted rates were assessed.

Results: There were 20 375 COVID-19 cases notified in Victoria as of 31 December 2020, of whom 748 (3.7%) died. Victorians aged ≥ 85 years experienced the highest case fatality ratio (34%). Mean observed mortality rates in 2020 (MR: 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.4, 11.9) were slightly reduced when compared with the annual rate expected using the historical mean method (mean MR: 12.2; 95% CI: 12.1-12.3; ∆MR: -0.57; 95% CI: -0.77, -0.38), but not from the rate expected using the robust regression (estimated MR: 11.7; 95% prediction interval [PI]: 11.5, 11.9; EMR: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.16). The two methods yielded opposing interpretations for some causes, including cardiovascular and cancer mortality.

Discussion: Interpretation of how pandemic restrictions impacted mortality in Victoria in 2020 is influenced by the method of estimation. Time-series approaches are preferential because they account for population trends in mortality over time.

澳大利亚维多利亚州COVID-19大流行控制背景下的死亡率监测:人口数据的时间序列分析
目的:在COVID-19大流行之前,在维多利亚州建立了死亡率监测。在这里,我们描述了该监测系统的建立,证明了所选择的建模方法的合理性,并举例说明所选择的模型如何影响对大流行期间死亡率变化的解释。方法:2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日发生在维多利亚州的登记死亡病例来源于维多利亚死亡指数。将观察到的死亡率与原始历史5年平均值和根据季节性稳健回归估计的预测平均值进行比较。评估了观察到的死亡率与历史平均值(∆MR)之间的差异,以及观察到的死亡率与预测死亡率之间的超额死亡率。结果:截至2020年12月31日,维多利亚州共报告COVID-19病例20375例,其中死亡748例(3.7%)。年龄≥85岁的维多利亚州人病死率最高(34%)。2020年观察到的平均死亡率(死亡率:11.6;95%可信区间[CI]: 11.4, 11.9)与使用历史平均方法预测的年发病率相比略有降低(平均MR: 12.2;95% ci: 12.1-12.3;∆先生:-0.57;95% CI: -0.77, -0.38),但不来自使用稳健回归的预期率(估计MR: 11.7;95%预测区间[PI]: 11.5, 11.9;EMR: -0.05;95% ci: -0.26, 0.16)。这两种方法对某些原因产生了相反的解释,包括心血管疾病和癌症死亡率。讨论:对大流行限制措施如何影响2020年维多利亚州死亡率的解释受到估计方法的影响。时间序列方法是优先考虑的,因为它们考虑到一段时间内死亡率的人口趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信