Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Lei Yan, Ziji Yu, Liwen Wu, Rachael Liu, Jianchang Lin
{"title":"Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods.","authors":"Lei Yan, Ziji Yu, Liwen Wu, Rachael Liu, Jianchang Lin","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00754-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional clinical trial monitoring process, which relies heavily on site visits and manual review of accumulative patient data reported through Electronic Data Capture system, is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The recently emerged risk-based monitoring (RBM) and quality tolerance limit (QTL) framework offers a more efficient alternative solution to traditional SDV (source data verification) based quality assurance. These frameworks aim at proactively identifying systematic issues that impact patient safety and data integrity. In this paper, we proposed a machine learning enabled approach to facilitate real-time, automated monitoring of clinical trial QTL risk assessment. Unlike the traditional quality assurance process, where QTLs are evaluated based on single-source data and arbitrary defined fixed threshold, we utilize the QTL-ML framework to integrate information from multiple clinical domains to predict the QTL of variety types at clinical program, study, site and patient level. Moreover, our approach is assumption-free, relying not on historical expectations but on dynamically accumulating trial data to predict quality tolerance limit risks in an automated manner. Embedded within ICH-E6 recommended RBM principles, this innovative machine learning solution for QTL monitoring has the potential to transform sponsors' ability to protect patient safety, reduce trial duration, and lower trial costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"566-578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00754-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional clinical trial monitoring process, which relies heavily on site visits and manual review of accumulative patient data reported through Electronic Data Capture system, is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The recently emerged risk-based monitoring (RBM) and quality tolerance limit (QTL) framework offers a more efficient alternative solution to traditional SDV (source data verification) based quality assurance. These frameworks aim at proactively identifying systematic issues that impact patient safety and data integrity. In this paper, we proposed a machine learning enabled approach to facilitate real-time, automated monitoring of clinical trial QTL risk assessment. Unlike the traditional quality assurance process, where QTLs are evaluated based on single-source data and arbitrary defined fixed threshold, we utilize the QTL-ML framework to integrate information from multiple clinical domains to predict the QTL of variety types at clinical program, study, site and patient level. Moreover, our approach is assumption-free, relying not on historical expectations but on dynamically accumulating trial data to predict quality tolerance limit risks in an automated manner. Embedded within ICH-E6 recommended RBM principles, this innovative machine learning solution for QTL monitoring has the potential to transform sponsors' ability to protect patient safety, reduce trial duration, and lower trial costs.

通过机器学习方法优化临床试验中质量公差限制监测。
传统的临床试验监测过程严重依赖于现场访问和人工审查通过电子数据采集系统报告的累积患者数据,耗时且资源密集。最近出现的基于风险的监测(RBM)和质量公差限制(QTL)框架为传统的基于源数据验证的质量保证提供了更有效的替代解决方案。这些框架旨在主动识别影响患者安全和数据完整性的系统问题。在本文中,我们提出了一种支持机器学习的方法,以促进临床试验QTL风险评估的实时、自动监测。与传统的质量保证过程不同,传统的质量保证过程是基于单源数据和任意定义的固定阈值来评估QTL,我们利用QTL- ml框架来整合来自多个临床领域的信息,以预测临床项目、研究、地点和患者水平的各种类型的QTL。此外,我们的方法是无假设的,不依赖于历史预期,而是依赖于动态累积的试验数据,以自动化的方式预测质量公差限制风险。嵌入ICH-E6推荐的RBM原则,这种用于QTL监测的创新机器学习解决方案有可能改变赞助商保护患者安全的能力,缩短试验持续时间,降低试验成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信