Validation of in-hospital diagnosis codes in one French hospital and out-hospital algorithm to identify skin ulcers in healthcare databases in France.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clément Jambon-Barbara, N'dah Mathieu Ouattara, Claire Bernardeau, Frédéric Olive, Sophie Blaise, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Charles Khouri
{"title":"Validation of in-hospital diagnosis codes in one French hospital and out-hospital algorithm to identify skin ulcers in healthcare databases in France.","authors":"Clément Jambon-Barbara, N'dah Mathieu Ouattara, Claire Bernardeau, Frédéric Olive, Sophie Blaise, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Charles Khouri","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study has two main objectives: 1/ to validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes of skin ulcer in one French hospital using medical charts; 2/ to validate an out-hospital algorithm against ICD-10 codes using a healthcare database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first validated in-hospital ICD-10 codes for pressure, diabetic and vascular skin ulcers using the Grenoble University Hospital medical charts. Secondly, we assessed the validity of an out-hospital algorithm using dressing reimbursements, medical exams and comorbidities to identify skin ulcers using the French \"échantillon généraliste des benéficiaires\" database. We then compared the type of skin ulcers in patients hospitalized 1 year around the out-hospital skin ulcer identification date. We calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performances of ICD-10 codes for identifying patients with vascular, diabetic and pressure ulcers were all superior to 70%. The out-hospital identification of skin ulcers selected very different patients, younger and with less comorbidities than those hospitalized for skin ulcers. In patients hospitalized 1 year before or after the first dispensation of wound dressings, the concordance with ICD-10 codes was modest. Indeed, patients are wrongly classified as pressure ulcers, vascular ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers in respectively 27.7%, 52.0% and 48.8% of skin ulcers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that performances of the in-hospital identification of pressure, vascular and diabetic foot ulcers were high allowing to use them to conduct observational studies in healthcare databases. However, outpatient identification retrieved heterogeneous performance, we therefore advise researchers using the latter to perform a sensitivity analysis restricted to hospitalized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2025.02.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study has two main objectives: 1/ to validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes of skin ulcer in one French hospital using medical charts; 2/ to validate an out-hospital algorithm against ICD-10 codes using a healthcare database.

Methods: We first validated in-hospital ICD-10 codes for pressure, diabetic and vascular skin ulcers using the Grenoble University Hospital medical charts. Secondly, we assessed the validity of an out-hospital algorithm using dressing reimbursements, medical exams and comorbidities to identify skin ulcers using the French "échantillon généraliste des benéficiaires" database. We then compared the type of skin ulcers in patients hospitalized 1 year around the out-hospital skin ulcer identification date. We calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: The performances of ICD-10 codes for identifying patients with vascular, diabetic and pressure ulcers were all superior to 70%. The out-hospital identification of skin ulcers selected very different patients, younger and with less comorbidities than those hospitalized for skin ulcers. In patients hospitalized 1 year before or after the first dispensation of wound dressings, the concordance with ICD-10 codes was modest. Indeed, patients are wrongly classified as pressure ulcers, vascular ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers in respectively 27.7%, 52.0% and 48.8% of skin ulcers.

Conclusion: We found that performances of the in-hospital identification of pressure, vascular and diabetic foot ulcers were high allowing to use them to conduct observational studies in healthcare databases. However, outpatient identification retrieved heterogeneous performance, we therefore advise researchers using the latter to perform a sensitivity analysis restricted to hospitalized patients.

验证一家法国医院的院内诊断代码和在法国医疗保健数据库中识别皮肤溃疡的院外算法。
目的:本研究有两个主要目的:1/利用医学图表验证法国一家医院《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)皮肤溃疡诊断代码;2/使用医疗保健数据库根据ICD-10代码验证院外算法。方法:我们首先使用格勒诺布尔大学医院的医疗图表验证了医院内关于压力、糖尿病和血管性皮肤溃疡的ICD-10代码。其次,我们利用法国的“ )”数据库,利用敷药报销、医学检查和合并症来识别皮肤溃疡,评估了院外算法的有效性。然后,我们比较了院外皮肤溃疡确诊日期前后住院1年的患者的皮肤溃疡类型。计算特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:ICD-10编码对血管性、糖尿病性和压疮患者的识别率均优于70%。皮肤溃疡的院外鉴定选择了非常不同的患者,比那些因皮肤溃疡住院的患者年轻,合并症少。在首次配用伤口敷料前后1年住院的患者中,与ICD-10编码的一致性不高。确实,在皮肤溃疡中,患者被错误分类为压疮、血管溃疡和糖尿病足溃疡的比例分别为27.7%、52.0%和48.8%。结论:我们发现医院内对压力、血管和糖尿病足溃疡的识别性能很高,可以在医疗数据库中使用它们进行观察性研究。然而,门诊识别检索异质性表现,因此,我们建议研究人员使用后者进行仅限于住院患者的敏感性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信