{"title":"Are humans facing a sleep epidemic or enlightenment? Large-scale, industrial societies exhibit long, efficient sleep yet weak circadian function.","authors":"David Ryan Samson, Leela McKinnon","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.2319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared sleep-related problems to be a public health epidemic. With the advent of biometric sleep tracking technology taking the sleep lab into the field, the study of human sleep is now global, and these new datasets show contrasting findings. Previous reports suggest sleep in small-scale, non-industrial societies to be short and fragmented yet characterized by greater circadian rhythmicity. However, the role of circadian rhythm indicators in understanding global variations in human sleep patterns remains unclear. We examine population-level sleep studies (<i>n</i> = 54) using polysomnography and actigraphy to test the sleep restriction epidemic hypothesis, which posits that labour demands and technological disruption in large-scale, industrial societies have reduced sleep duration. We used an actigraphy-generated circadian function index from both non-industrial and industrial societies (<i>n</i> = 866) to test the circadian mismatch hypothesis, which suggests that poor chronohygiene in regulated environments misaligns circadian rhythms in industrial societies. In rejection of the sleep restriction epidemic hypothesis, our results show that industrial societies experience the longest, most efficient sleep, whereas in support of the circadian mismatch hypothesis, sleepers in non-industrial societies are characterized by the greatest circadian function.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2041","pages":"20242319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared sleep-related problems to be a public health epidemic. With the advent of biometric sleep tracking technology taking the sleep lab into the field, the study of human sleep is now global, and these new datasets show contrasting findings. Previous reports suggest sleep in small-scale, non-industrial societies to be short and fragmented yet characterized by greater circadian rhythmicity. However, the role of circadian rhythm indicators in understanding global variations in human sleep patterns remains unclear. We examine population-level sleep studies (n = 54) using polysomnography and actigraphy to test the sleep restriction epidemic hypothesis, which posits that labour demands and technological disruption in large-scale, industrial societies have reduced sleep duration. We used an actigraphy-generated circadian function index from both non-industrial and industrial societies (n = 866) to test the circadian mismatch hypothesis, which suggests that poor chronohygiene in regulated environments misaligns circadian rhythms in industrial societies. In rejection of the sleep restriction epidemic hypothesis, our results show that industrial societies experience the longest, most efficient sleep, whereas in support of the circadian mismatch hypothesis, sleepers in non-industrial societies are characterized by the greatest circadian function.
期刊介绍:
Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.