Development and Validation of a Clinical Model (SHACEA) for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Prognosis Occurred at Acute Phase and Last to 6 Months.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Molecular Neurobiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s12035-025-04783-y
Nuo Ma, Yichen Zhao, Xiulin Meng, Yiming Huang, Jiangping Ma, Xueyuan Liu, Guilin Meng
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Clinical Model (SHACEA) for Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Prognosis Occurred at Acute Phase and Last to 6 Months.","authors":"Nuo Ma, Yichen Zhao, Xiulin Meng, Yiming Huang, Jiangping Ma, Xueyuan Liu, Guilin Meng","doi":"10.1007/s12035-025-04783-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) leads to poor long-term stroke outcomes, severely increasing social and economic burdens. It is helpful to identify and intervene in PSCI in the early stage. This study intends to develop a new clinical risk score for identifying stroke survivors at significant risk of PSCI from the acute phase to 6 months of onset and to validate the new score using both internal and external cohorts. Analysis aiming to evaluate prognostic factors of acute-phase cognitive impairment lasting 6 months was carried out using two independent datasets, with one for model development and the other for validation. All enrolled patients completed baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging data collection and cognitive function scale assessment. The follow-up period was 6 months after the stroke, and interviews and cognitive function assessments were completed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and the most important predictors were finally screened for modeling a prediction model. Six months post-stroke, 39.19% maintained PSCI in the development dataset. The final nine-point SHACEA (Stenosis, Hyperintensity, Age, Chronic cortical infarcts, Education, Atrophy) had an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.69-0.92) and was overall predictive of PSCI (LR χ<sup>2</sup> statistic of 89.34; p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the SHACEA risk score was still relatively reliable in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.80). The SHACEA risk score adequately identified acute stroke patients with cognitive impairment who are at an increased risk of developing PSCI after 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":18762,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Neurobiology","volume":" ","pages":"8475-8483"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-025-04783-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) leads to poor long-term stroke outcomes, severely increasing social and economic burdens. It is helpful to identify and intervene in PSCI in the early stage. This study intends to develop a new clinical risk score for identifying stroke survivors at significant risk of PSCI from the acute phase to 6 months of onset and to validate the new score using both internal and external cohorts. Analysis aiming to evaluate prognostic factors of acute-phase cognitive impairment lasting 6 months was carried out using two independent datasets, with one for model development and the other for validation. All enrolled patients completed baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging data collection and cognitive function scale assessment. The follow-up period was 6 months after the stroke, and interviews and cognitive function assessments were completed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and the most important predictors were finally screened for modeling a prediction model. Six months post-stroke, 39.19% maintained PSCI in the development dataset. The final nine-point SHACEA (Stenosis, Hyperintensity, Age, Chronic cortical infarcts, Education, Atrophy) had an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.69-0.92) and was overall predictive of PSCI (LR χ2 statistic of 89.34; p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the SHACEA risk score was still relatively reliable in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.80). The SHACEA risk score adequately identified acute stroke patients with cognitive impairment who are at an increased risk of developing PSCI after 6 months.

脑卒中后认知障碍急性期及6个月预后临床模型(SHACEA)的建立与验证
卒中后认知功能障碍(PSCI)会导致不良的长期卒中预后,严重增加社会和经济负担。早期识别和干预 PSCI 很有帮助。本研究旨在开发一种新的临床风险评分,用于识别急性期至发病后 6 个月内有 PSCI 重要风险的卒中幸存者,并通过内部和外部队列对新评分进行验证。分析旨在评估急性期认知障碍持续 6 个月的预后因素,采用两个独立的数据集,一个用于模型开发,另一个用于验证。所有入组患者均完成了基线人口统计学、临床和影像学数据收集以及认知功能量表评估。随访期为中风后 6 个月,并完成访谈和认知功能评估。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,最终筛选出最重要的预测因素,建立了预测模型。在开发数据集中,卒中后六个月仍能保持 PSCI 的比例为 39.19%。最终的九点 SHACEA(狭窄、高密度、年龄、慢性皮质梗死、教育、萎缩)的 AUROC 为 0.87(95% CI 0.69-0.92),对 PSCI 具有总体预测作用(LR χ2 统计量为 89.34;P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Neurobiology
Molecular Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Neurobiology is an exciting journal for neuroscientists needing to stay in close touch with progress at the forefront of molecular brain research today. It is an especially important periodical for graduate students and "postdocs," specifically designed to synthesize and critically assess research trends for all neuroscientists hoping to stay active at the cutting edge of this dramatically developing area. This journal has proven to be crucial in departmental libraries, serving as essential reading for every committed neuroscientist who is striving to keep abreast of all rapid developments in a forefront field. Most recent significant advances in experimental and clinical neuroscience have been occurring at the molecular level. Until now, there has been no journal devoted to looking closely at this fragmented literature in a critical, coherent fashion. Each submission is thoroughly analyzed by scientists and clinicians internationally renowned for their special competence in the areas treated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信