Post-stroke Stiff-Knee gait: are there different types or different severity levels?

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jeonghwan Lee, Bryant A Seamon, Robert K Lee, Steven A Kautz, Richard R Neptune, James S Sulzer
{"title":"Post-stroke Stiff-Knee gait: are there different types or different severity levels?","authors":"Jeonghwan Lee, Bryant A Seamon, Robert K Lee, Steven A Kautz, Richard R Neptune, James S Sulzer","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01582-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stiff-Knee gait (SKG) commonly occurs in individuals after stroke, loosely defined as reduced peak knee flexion angle during swing. The causes of SKG are multifaceted and debated. Further, clinical interventions have not been consistently effective, possibly resulting from multiple undiagnosed subtypes of SKG. Thus, our primary goal of this study is to explore the existence of potential subtypes associated with different levels of motor control complexity. We used retrospective kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity from 50 stroke survivors and 15 healthy, age-matched controls during treadmill walking. We used a time-series kernel k-means cluster analysis based on compensatory frontal plane kinematics associated with SKG to separate participants into three groups, Cluster A (hip hiking, lowest knee flexion, highest propulsion asymmetry, lowest gait speed), Cluster B (hip hiking and hip abduction, moderate knee flexion, middle gait speed) and Cluster C (highest knee flexion, highest gait speed). The highest proportion of individuals with SKG as diagnosed by a clinician were in Cluster A, but with a substantial proportion in Cluster B, indicating that these two clusters can be considered subtypes of SKG. Despite differences in kinematics and kinetics, we did not observe fundamental differences in underlying motor control between clusters as determined by non-negative matrix factorization of measured muscle activations. We conclude that the differences between clusters were most likely attributed to the severity of gait impairment, as reflected by slower gait speed and propulsion asymmetry, rather than being a different type of SKG.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01582-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stiff-Knee gait (SKG) commonly occurs in individuals after stroke, loosely defined as reduced peak knee flexion angle during swing. The causes of SKG are multifaceted and debated. Further, clinical interventions have not been consistently effective, possibly resulting from multiple undiagnosed subtypes of SKG. Thus, our primary goal of this study is to explore the existence of potential subtypes associated with different levels of motor control complexity. We used retrospective kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity from 50 stroke survivors and 15 healthy, age-matched controls during treadmill walking. We used a time-series kernel k-means cluster analysis based on compensatory frontal plane kinematics associated with SKG to separate participants into three groups, Cluster A (hip hiking, lowest knee flexion, highest propulsion asymmetry, lowest gait speed), Cluster B (hip hiking and hip abduction, moderate knee flexion, middle gait speed) and Cluster C (highest knee flexion, highest gait speed). The highest proportion of individuals with SKG as diagnosed by a clinician were in Cluster A, but with a substantial proportion in Cluster B, indicating that these two clusters can be considered subtypes of SKG. Despite differences in kinematics and kinetics, we did not observe fundamental differences in underlying motor control between clusters as determined by non-negative matrix factorization of measured muscle activations. We conclude that the differences between clusters were most likely attributed to the severity of gait impairment, as reflected by slower gait speed and propulsion asymmetry, rather than being a different type of SKG.

中风后硬膝步态:有不同的类型或不同的严重程度吗?
硬膝步态(SKG)通常发生在中风后的个体,松散地定义为挥拍时膝关节屈曲角度峰值降低。SKG的原因是多方面的,并且存在争议。此外,临床干预并非一贯有效,可能是由于多种未诊断的SKG亚型。因此,我们这项研究的主要目的是探索与不同水平的运动控制复杂性相关的潜在亚型的存在。我们对50名中风幸存者和15名年龄匹配的健康对照者在跑步机上行走时的运动学、动力学和肌肉活动进行了回顾性分析。我们使用基于与SKG相关的代偿正面平面运动学的时间序列核k-均值聚类分析将参与者分为三组,a组(髋部徒步旅行,最低膝关节屈曲,最高推进不对称,最低步态速度),B组(髋部徒步旅行和髋关节外展,中度膝关节屈曲,中等步态速度)和C组(最高膝关节屈曲,最高步态速度)。被临床医生诊断为SKG的个体在a类中所占比例最高,但在B类中所占比例相当大,这表明这两个类可以被认为是SKG的亚型。尽管运动学和动力学存在差异,但我们没有观察到通过测量肌肉激活的非负矩阵分解确定的集群之间潜在运动控制的根本差异。我们得出结论,集群之间的差异最有可能归因于步态障碍的严重程度,如步态速度较慢和推进不对称所反映的那样,而不是不同类型的SKG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信