Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Affect Post-Progression Survival of Specific Patient Subgroups With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study Cohorts' Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13332
Giuseppe A Colloca, Antonella Venturino
{"title":"Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Affect Post-Progression Survival of Specific Patient Subgroups With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study Cohorts' Analysis.","authors":"Giuseppe A Colloca, Antonella Venturino","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.13332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immunotherapy-based regimens (IMBs), compared with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). The aim of the study was to explore the interaction of prognostic factors with survival in study cohorts receiving IMB or TKI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed and single arms of phase III trials including IMB or TKI were selected. Analysis of IMB and TKI cohorts was performed, and the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) with OS was assessed. Finally, 13 variables were extracted, and their relationships with survival in the two groups were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three study cohorts were selected. Longer OS and post-progression survival (PPS) were evident in the group of IMB, while the relationship of PFS with OS was significant only in the TKI cohorts (β = 0.527, p = 0.007). Prognostic factors in the IMB cohorts did not report any significant relationship with OS, while among patients receiving TKIs, longer OS was documented with elder age (β = 0.577, p = 0.003) and good performance status (β = 0.500, p = 0.011). Conversely, in the IMB cohorts, PPS increased with hepatitis B virus (HBV) (β = 0.756, p = 0.030) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification (BCLC) stage (β = 0.898, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In contrast to TKIs, IMBs improved the outcome of patients with aHCC by increasing PPS, particularly in patients with BCLC stage C and HBV-related hepatopathy, but the outcome improvement was lost in patients with hepatitis C virus-related liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"655-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.13332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Immunotherapy-based regimens (IMBs), compared with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), improve the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). The aim of the study was to explore the interaction of prognostic factors with survival in study cohorts receiving IMB or TKI.

Methods: A systematic search was performed and single arms of phase III trials including IMB or TKI were selected. Analysis of IMB and TKI cohorts was performed, and the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) with OS was assessed. Finally, 13 variables were extracted, and their relationships with survival in the two groups were evaluated.

Results: Thirty-three study cohorts were selected. Longer OS and post-progression survival (PPS) were evident in the group of IMB, while the relationship of PFS with OS was significant only in the TKI cohorts (β = 0.527, p = 0.007). Prognostic factors in the IMB cohorts did not report any significant relationship with OS, while among patients receiving TKIs, longer OS was documented with elder age (β = 0.577, p = 0.003) and good performance status (β = 0.500, p = 0.011). Conversely, in the IMB cohorts, PPS increased with hepatitis B virus (HBV) (β = 0.756, p = 0.030) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Classification (BCLC) stage (β = 0.898, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: In contrast to TKIs, IMBs improved the outcome of patients with aHCC by increasing PPS, particularly in patients with BCLC stage C and HBV-related hepatopathy, but the outcome improvement was lost in patients with hepatitis C virus-related liver disease.

免疫检查点抑制剂影响晚期肝细胞癌特定患者亚组的进展后生存:一项研究队列分析
目的:与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)相比,基于免疫治疗的方案(IMBs)提高了晚期肝细胞癌(aHCC)患者的总生存期(OS)。该研究的目的是探讨在接受IMB或TKI的研究队列中预后因素与生存率的相互作用。方法:进行系统检索,选择包括IMB或TKI在内的单组III期试验。对IMB和TKI队列进行分析,并评估无进展生存期(PFS)与OS之间的关系。最后提取13个变量,评估其与两组患者生存率的关系。结果:共选择33个研究队列。IMB组有更长的生存期和进展后生存期(PPS),而PFS与OS的关系仅在TKI组中有统计学意义(β = 0.527, p = 0.007)。IMB队列中的预后因素未报告与生存期有任何显著关系,而在接受tki的患者中,较长的生存期与年龄(β = 0.577, p = 0.003)和良好的运动状态(β = 0.500, p = 0.011)有关。相反,在IMB队列中,PPS随着乙型肝炎病毒(HBV) (β = 0.756, p = 0.030)和巴塞罗那临床肝脏分类(BCLC)分期(β = 0.898, p = 0.002)而增加。结论:与TKIs相比,IMBs通过增加PPS改善aHCC患者的预后,特别是在BCLC C期和hbv相关肝病患者中,但在丙型肝炎病毒相关肝病患者中没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信