Effect of previous cardiac surgery on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Min Chen, Shu-Hao Chang, Sheng-Yueh Yu, Lai-Chu See
{"title":"Effect of previous cardiac surgery on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Chun-Yu Lin, Wei-Min Chen, Shu-Hao Chang, Sheng-Yueh Yu, Lai-Chu See","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The effect of previous cardiac surgery (PCS) on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remains controversial. This study compared the primary outcome (in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (postoperative complications and post-discharge mortality/aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years) of patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS through a nationwide cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to enroll patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS (94 and 4532, respectively) between 2004-07-01 and 2017-03-31. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create well-balanced PCS (n = 74) and non-PCS (n = 296) groups. Results before and after PSM were aligned to determine the role of PCS in primary and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, the PCS group was older and had more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and malignancy, but less stroke history than the non-PCS group. More patients in the PCS group received coronary artery bypass grafting during the repair than in the non-PCS group. The PCS group had a higher in-hospital mortality than the non-PCS group. After PSM, the in-hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (27.0% versus 26.7%; P = 0.953). For patients who survived to discharge, the all-cause mortality up to 5 years for PCS and non-PCS groups were 29.7% and 18.4% (P = 0.015) before and 29.6% and 23.1% (P = 0.313) after PSM, respectively. The two groups had similar aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years before (13.5% versus 11.7%; P = 0.727) and after PSM (13.8% versus 11.6%; P = 0.776).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PCS who underwent ATAAD repair showed higher in-hospital and long-term mortality rates than those without PCS when not controlled for confounding factors. However, the disparity disappeared after PSM, indicating that worse outcomes might be due to its old age and different perioperative characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of previous cardiac surgery (PCS) on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remains controversial. This study compared the primary outcome (in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (postoperative complications and post-discharge mortality/aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years) of patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS through a nationwide cohort analysis.

Methods: We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to enroll patients who underwent ATAAD repair with and without PCS (94 and 4532, respectively) between 2004-07-01 and 2017-03-31. A 1:4 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create well-balanced PCS (n = 74) and non-PCS (n = 296) groups. Results before and after PSM were aligned to determine the role of PCS in primary and secondary outcomes.

Results: Before PSM, the PCS group was older and had more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and malignancy, but less stroke history than the non-PCS group. More patients in the PCS group received coronary artery bypass grafting during the repair than in the non-PCS group. The PCS group had a higher in-hospital mortality than the non-PCS group. After PSM, the in-hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (27.0% versus 26.7%; P = 0.953). For patients who survived to discharge, the all-cause mortality up to 5 years for PCS and non-PCS groups were 29.7% and 18.4% (P = 0.015) before and 29.6% and 23.1% (P = 0.313) after PSM, respectively. The two groups had similar aortic reoperation rates up to 5 years before (13.5% versus 11.7%; P = 0.727) and after PSM (13.8% versus 11.6%; P = 0.776).

Conclusions: Patients with PCS who underwent ATAAD repair showed higher in-hospital and long-term mortality rates than those without PCS when not controlled for confounding factors. However, the disparity disappeared after PSM, indicating that worse outcomes might be due to its old age and different perioperative characteristics.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信