Ongoing phase 2 agents for multiple sclerosis: could we break the phase 3 trial deadlock?

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Silvia Susin-Calle, Jose Enrique Martinez-Rodriguez, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada
{"title":"Ongoing phase 2 agents for multiple sclerosis: could we break the phase 3 trial deadlock?","authors":"Silvia Susin-Calle, Jose Enrique Martinez-Rodriguez, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2025.2472240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. While disease-modifying therapies have significantly improved the management of relapsing MS, progressive MS remains a major clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a general overview of recent and ongoing phase 2 clinical trials investigating treatments for MS, summarizing emerging results when available. The trials are categorized based on the desired therapeutic effect: immunomodulatory treatments, neuroprotection, and remyelination. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant studies, with a focus on promising therapies that address both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite promising results from phase 2 trials, many phase 3 trials fail to demonstrate significant efficacy. This discrepancy is partly due to limitations in biomarkers, which often lack disease specificity and fail to predict long-term outcomes. Additionally, smaller, narrowly focused phase 2 trials may overestimate efficacy, leading to challenges when transitioning to larger, more inclusive phase 3 trials. Recruitment of patients with less aggressive disease further complicates phase 3 success. Addressing these challenges requires the refinement of biomarkers, adoption of unified definitions for outcomes like progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and trial designs that better capture the complexity of MS progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"217-229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2472240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. While disease-modifying therapies have significantly improved the management of relapsing MS, progressive MS remains a major clinical challenge.

Areas covered: This review provides a general overview of recent and ongoing phase 2 clinical trials investigating treatments for MS, summarizing emerging results when available. The trials are categorized based on the desired therapeutic effect: immunomodulatory treatments, neuroprotection, and remyelination. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant studies, with a focus on promising therapies that address both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS.

Expert opinion: Despite promising results from phase 2 trials, many phase 3 trials fail to demonstrate significant efficacy. This discrepancy is partly due to limitations in biomarkers, which often lack disease specificity and fail to predict long-term outcomes. Additionally, smaller, narrowly focused phase 2 trials may overestimate efficacy, leading to challenges when transitioning to larger, more inclusive phase 3 trials. Recruitment of patients with less aggressive disease further complicates phase 3 success. Addressing these challenges requires the refinement of biomarkers, adoption of unified definitions for outcomes like progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and trial designs that better capture the complexity of MS progression.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信