Ongoing phase 2 agents for multiple sclerosis: could we break the phase 3 trial deadlock?

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Silvia Susin-Calle, Jose Enrique Martinez-Rodriguez, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada
{"title":"Ongoing phase 2 agents for multiple sclerosis: could we break the phase 3 trial deadlock?","authors":"Silvia Susin-Calle, Jose Enrique Martinez-Rodriguez, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2025.2472240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. While disease-modifying therapies have significantly improved the management of relapsing MS, progressive MS remains a major clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a general overview of recent and ongoing phase 2 clinical trials investigating treatments for MS, summarizing emerging results when available. The trials are categorized based on the desired therapeutic effect: immunomodulatory treatments, neuroprotection, and remyelination. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant studies, with a focus on promising therapies that address both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite promising results from phase 2 trials, many phase 3 trials fail to demonstrate significant efficacy. This discrepancy is partly due to limitations in biomarkers, which often lack disease specificity and fail to predict long-term outcomes. Additionally, smaller, narrowly focused phase 2 trials may overestimate efficacy, leading to challenges when transitioning to larger, more inclusive phase 3 trials. Recruitment of patients with less aggressive disease further complicates phase 3 success. Addressing these challenges requires the refinement of biomarkers, adoption of unified definitions for outcomes like progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and trial designs that better capture the complexity of MS progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"217-229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2472240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. While disease-modifying therapies have significantly improved the management of relapsing MS, progressive MS remains a major clinical challenge.

Areas covered: This review provides a general overview of recent and ongoing phase 2 clinical trials investigating treatments for MS, summarizing emerging results when available. The trials are categorized based on the desired therapeutic effect: immunomodulatory treatments, neuroprotection, and remyelination. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant studies, with a focus on promising therapies that address both inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes in MS.

Expert opinion: Despite promising results from phase 2 trials, many phase 3 trials fail to demonstrate significant efficacy. This discrepancy is partly due to limitations in biomarkers, which often lack disease specificity and fail to predict long-term outcomes. Additionally, smaller, narrowly focused phase 2 trials may overestimate efficacy, leading to challenges when transitioning to larger, more inclusive phase 3 trials. Recruitment of patients with less aggressive disease further complicates phase 3 success. Addressing these challenges requires the refinement of biomarkers, adoption of unified definitions for outcomes like progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and trial designs that better capture the complexity of MS progression.

正在进行的多发性硬化症2期药物:我们能打破3期试验僵局吗?
简介:多发性硬化症(MS)是一种中枢神经系统的慢性炎症性和神经退行性疾病。虽然疾病修饰疗法显著改善了复发性MS的管理,但进展性MS仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。涵盖领域:本综述提供了最近和正在进行的研究多发性硬化症治疗的2期临床试验的总体概述,总结了可用的新结果。这些试验根据预期的治疗效果进行分类:免疫调节治疗、神经保护和髓鞘再生。我们使用PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov等数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以确定相关研究,重点关注有希望的治疗多发性硬化炎症和神经退行性过程的方法。专家意见:尽管2期试验的结果很有希望,但许多3期试验未能证明显著的疗效。这种差异部分是由于生物标志物的局限性,生物标志物往往缺乏疾病特异性,无法预测长期预后。此外,规模较小、范围狭窄的2期试验可能会高估疗效,从而在向规模更大、范围更广的3期试验过渡时带来挑战。招募侵袭性较小的患者进一步复杂化了3期的成功。解决这些挑战需要改进生物标志物,采用统一的结果定义,如独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA),以及更好地捕捉MS进展复杂性的试验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信