A User-Centric Approach to Reliable Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis for Biomedical Applications

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Georg Popp, Lisa Jöckel, Michael Kläs, Thomas Wiener, Nadja Hilger, Nils Stumpf, Janek Groß, Anna Dünkel, Ulrich Blache, Stephan Fricke, Paul Franz
{"title":"A User-Centric Approach to Reliable Automated Flow Cytometry Data Analysis for Biomedical Applications","authors":"Georg Popp,&nbsp;Lisa Jöckel,&nbsp;Michael Kläs,&nbsp;Thomas Wiener,&nbsp;Nadja Hilger,&nbsp;Nils Stumpf,&nbsp;Janek Groß,&nbsp;Anna Dünkel,&nbsp;Ulrich Blache,&nbsp;Stephan Fricke,&nbsp;Paul Franz","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Automation and the increased number of measurable parameters in flow cytometry (FCM) have strongly increased the volume and complexity of phenotyping immune cell populations. Despite numerous automated gating methods for FCM analysis, their adoption in routine practice remains challenging due to accessibility barriers for users and potential model failures. Here, we propose a user-centered solution that combines elements of supervised machine learning (SML), rapid application development (RAD), systematic quality assurance guided by structured argumentation, and uncertainty estimation to address these challenges. We implement a data-driven model for event classification and use RAD to generate software prototypes, allowing FCM users to apply the model for automated gating. Considering concepts for structured argumentation from assurance cases (ACs), we derived and justified quality analyses that inform users about the quality of the model. We propose guiding the model operation phase using uncertainty estimation to provide users with a clear understanding of the model's confidence in its predictions. We aim to overcome barriers to the routine application of automated gating and contribute to more reliable and efficient FCM data analysis. Our approach is based on the application of phenotyping for human immune cells. We encourage future research to investigate the potential of SML, ACs, and uncertainty estimation to address dependability of data-driven models (DDMs) supporting diagnostic decision making in the medical domain, including FCM in clinical applications and highly regulated areas such as pharmaceutical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":"107 2","pages":"111-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.a.24913","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automation and the increased number of measurable parameters in flow cytometry (FCM) have strongly increased the volume and complexity of phenotyping immune cell populations. Despite numerous automated gating methods for FCM analysis, their adoption in routine practice remains challenging due to accessibility barriers for users and potential model failures. Here, we propose a user-centered solution that combines elements of supervised machine learning (SML), rapid application development (RAD), systematic quality assurance guided by structured argumentation, and uncertainty estimation to address these challenges. We implement a data-driven model for event classification and use RAD to generate software prototypes, allowing FCM users to apply the model for automated gating. Considering concepts for structured argumentation from assurance cases (ACs), we derived and justified quality analyses that inform users about the quality of the model. We propose guiding the model operation phase using uncertainty estimation to provide users with a clear understanding of the model's confidence in its predictions. We aim to overcome barriers to the routine application of automated gating and contribute to more reliable and efficient FCM data analysis. Our approach is based on the application of phenotyping for human immune cells. We encourage future research to investigate the potential of SML, ACs, and uncertainty estimation to address dependability of data-driven models (DDMs) supporting diagnostic decision making in the medical domain, including FCM in clinical applications and highly regulated areas such as pharmaceutical research.

Abstract Image

以用户为中心的可靠的生物医学应用流式细胞术数据分析方法。
自动化和流式细胞术(FCM)中可测量参数数量的增加大大增加了免疫细胞群表型的体积和复杂性。尽管有许多用于FCM分析的自动化门控方法,但由于用户的可访问性障碍和潜在的模型故障,它们在日常实践中的采用仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们提出了一个以用户为中心的解决方案,该解决方案结合了监督机器学习(SML)、快速应用程序开发(RAD)、由结构化论证指导的系统质量保证和不确定性估计的元素来应对这些挑战。我们实现了一个数据驱动的事件分类模型,并使用RAD来生成软件原型,允许FCM用户将模型应用于自动门控。考虑到来自保证案例(ACs)的结构化论证的概念,我们推导并证明了告知用户模型质量的质量分析。我们建议使用不确定性估计来指导模型运行阶段,让用户清楚地了解模型对其预测的置信度。我们的目标是克服自动化门控常规应用的障碍,并有助于更可靠和高效的FCM数据分析。我们的方法是基于表型对人类免疫细胞的应用。我们鼓励未来的研究调查SML、ACs和不确定性估计的潜力,以解决支持医疗领域诊断决策的数据驱动模型(ddm)的可靠性,包括临床应用中的FCM和药物研究等高度监管领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信