Maintained sympathetic reactivity but blunted pressor response to static handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Takuro Washio, Ryosuke Takeda, Sarah L Hissen, John D Akins, Andrew W D'Souza, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany Brazile, Kevin Lutz, Christopher M Hearon, James P MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Benjamin D Levine, Paul J Fadel, Qi Fu
{"title":"Maintained sympathetic reactivity but blunted pressor response to static handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.","authors":"Takuro Washio, Ryosuke Takeda, Sarah L Hissen, John D Akins, Andrew W D'Souza, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany Brazile, Kevin Lutz, Christopher M Hearon, James P MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Benjamin D Levine, Paul J Fadel, Qi Fu","doi":"10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent studies have reported blunted increases in blood pressure (BP) during static handgrip (SHG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be attributed to abnormal sympathetic reactivity during exercise and/or impaired muscle metaboreflex function. However, it is unknown whether the sympathetic neural response to SHG and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation via post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) are attenuated in HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients with HFpEF and 24 age-matched non-HFpEF controls were studied in the supine position. BP, heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during SHG at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue followed by 2-min PECO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower and peak increase (Δ) in MAP was smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls during SHG (Δ23 ± 15 [standard deviation] vs. Δ34 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.007) and PECO (Δ15 ± 11 vs. Δ19 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.047). HR was greater in patients at rest but did not differ between the two groups at peak SHG. Patients had higher resting MSNA burst frequency than controls (37 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 13 bursts/min; P = 0.031); however, burst incidence was not different between the groups (P = 0.226). There were no differences in MSNA responses to SHG (Δ19 ± 15 vs. Δ18 ± 10 bursts/min at peak; P = 0.841) or PECO (Δ3 ± 12 vs. Δ5 ± 7 bursts/min; P = 0.495) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients with HFpEF maintained sympathetic reactivity but had an attenuated pressor response during fatiguing SHG. Additionally, muscle metaboreflex activation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow appeared to be minimal in both groups, with no significant difference between patients and controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies have reported blunted increases in blood pressure (BP) during static handgrip (SHG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be attributed to abnormal sympathetic reactivity during exercise and/or impaired muscle metaboreflex function. However, it is unknown whether the sympathetic neural response to SHG and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation via post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) are attenuated in HFpEF.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients with HFpEF and 24 age-matched non-HFpEF controls were studied in the supine position. BP, heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during SHG at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue followed by 2-min PECO.

Results: Resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower and peak increase (Δ) in MAP was smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls during SHG (Δ23 ± 15 [standard deviation] vs. Δ34 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.007) and PECO (Δ15 ± 11 vs. Δ19 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.047). HR was greater in patients at rest but did not differ between the two groups at peak SHG. Patients had higher resting MSNA burst frequency than controls (37 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 13 bursts/min; P = 0.031); however, burst incidence was not different between the groups (P = 0.226). There were no differences in MSNA responses to SHG (Δ19 ± 15 vs. Δ18 ± 10 bursts/min at peak; P = 0.841) or PECO (Δ3 ± 12 vs. Δ5 ± 7 bursts/min; P = 0.495) between groups.

Conclusion: The patients with HFpEF maintained sympathetic reactivity but had an attenuated pressor response during fatiguing SHG. Additionally, muscle metaboreflex activation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow appeared to be minimal in both groups, with no significant difference between patients and controls.

保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者,静态握力运动维持交感神经反应,但降低升压反应。
目的:最近的研究报道了心力衰竭伴射血分数(HFpEF)患者在静握(SHG)期间血压(BP)的钝化升高,这可能归因于运动时交感神经反应异常和/或肌肉代谢反射功能受损。然而,在HFpEF中,交感神经对SHG的反应和通过运动后循环闭塞(PECO)激活的孤立肌肉代谢反射是否减弱尚不清楚。方法:采用仰卧位对39例HFpEF患者和24例年龄匹配的非HFpEF对照组进行研究。血压、心率(HR)和肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)在SHG期间测量,在最大自愿收缩的40%,直到疲劳,然后是2分钟PECO。结果:在SHG期间,HFpEF患者的静息平均动脉压(MAP)较低,MAP的峰值升高(Δ)小于对照组(Δ23±15[标准差]vs. Δ34±15 mmHg;P = 0.007)和PECO (Δ15±11 vs. Δ19±9 mmHg;p = 0.047)。静息时患者心率更高,但在SHG峰值时两组间无差异。患者静息时MSNA爆发频率高于对照组(37±14 vs 27±13);p = 0.031);两组间爆发发生率无显著差异(P = 0.226)。MSNA对SHG的反应无差异(峰值Δ19±15 vs Δ18±10次/分钟);P = 0.841)或PECO(Δ3±12与Δ5±7暴/分钟;P = 0.495)。结论:在疲劳SHG过程中,HFpEF患者维持交感神经反应,但血压反应减弱。此外,血管舒缩性交感神经流出的肌肉代谢反射激活在两组中似乎是最小的,在患者和对照组之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信