Modelling Predictors of Homophily on Perceived Oral Health Status Among Social Network Ties in a Population of Public Housing Residents.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sharon M Casey, Mabeline Velez, Robert McDonough, Julia C Bond, Raul Garcia, Neha Gondal, Brenda Heaton
{"title":"Modelling Predictors of Homophily on Perceived Oral Health Status Among Social Network Ties in a Population of Public Housing Residents.","authors":"Sharon M Casey, Mabeline Velez, Robert McDonough, Julia C Bond, Raul Garcia, Neha Gondal, Brenda Heaton","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individual behaviours are often shared within social networks (homophily), suggesting network-level interventions hold promise for health promotion. Yet, little is known about oral health homophily. This study aimed to identify individual- and network-based predictors of oral health homophily among individual's (ego) social networks of public housing residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Respondents self-reported demographics, oral health status and associated risk behaviours (n = 277). They named social contacts (alters), reported on relationship attributes, demographics and behavioural characteristics (n = 889). Hypothesised predictors of oral health homophily included relationship attributes (e.g., contact frequency), respondent-level and shared characteristics. Oral health homophily was modelled using multilevel (hierarchical) logistic regression evaluating model attributes (AIC) to determine gains in explanatory power.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relationship strength, including high frequency of shared meals and contact, was associated with higher odds of oral health homophily (OR [95% CI]: 1.92 [1.05, 3.52] and 1.62 [1.00, 2.63], respectively). The best performing model included daily shared meals and contact, respondent age, smoking and oral health status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral health homophily is predicted by relationship strength and 'excellent/very good/good' oral health. Respondents with poorer oral health and a smoking history were less homophilous in oral health. Multilevel interventions targeting oral health outcomes may benefit from accounting for social relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Individual behaviours are often shared within social networks (homophily), suggesting network-level interventions hold promise for health promotion. Yet, little is known about oral health homophily. This study aimed to identify individual- and network-based predictors of oral health homophily among individual's (ego) social networks of public housing residents.

Methods: Respondents self-reported demographics, oral health status and associated risk behaviours (n = 277). They named social contacts (alters), reported on relationship attributes, demographics and behavioural characteristics (n = 889). Hypothesised predictors of oral health homophily included relationship attributes (e.g., contact frequency), respondent-level and shared characteristics. Oral health homophily was modelled using multilevel (hierarchical) logistic regression evaluating model attributes (AIC) to determine gains in explanatory power.

Results: Relationship strength, including high frequency of shared meals and contact, was associated with higher odds of oral health homophily (OR [95% CI]: 1.92 [1.05, 3.52] and 1.62 [1.00, 2.63], respectively). The best performing model included daily shared meals and contact, respondent age, smoking and oral health status.

Conclusions: Oral health homophily is predicted by relationship strength and 'excellent/very good/good' oral health. Respondents with poorer oral health and a smoking history were less homophilous in oral health. Multilevel interventions targeting oral health outcomes may benefit from accounting for social relationships.

公共住房居民社会网络关系中口腔健康状况同质性的建模预测因子。
目的:个体行为通常在社会网络中共享(同质性),这表明网络层面的干预措施有望促进健康。然而,人们对口腔健康的同质性知之甚少。本研究旨在找出公共住房居民个人(自我)社会网络中口腔健康同质性的个体和网络预测因子。方法:受访者自我报告人口统计学、口腔健康状况和相关危险行为(n = 277)。他们命名了社会联系人,报告了关系属性、人口统计和行为特征(n = 889)。口腔健康同质性的假设预测因子包括关系属性(如接触频率)、被调查者水平和共同特征。口腔健康同质性采用多层(分层)逻辑回归评估模型属性(AIC)来确定解释力的增益。结果:关系强度,包括共同进餐和接触频率高,与口腔健康一致性的几率较高相关(OR [95% CI]分别为1.92[1.05,3.52]和1.62[1.00,2.63])。表现最好的模型包括每日共享膳食和接触、受访者年龄、吸烟和口腔健康状况。结论:口腔健康同质性可通过关系强度和口腔健康“优秀/非常好/良好”预测。口腔健康状况较差和有吸烟史的应答者口腔健康状况不太相似。针对口腔健康结果的多层次干预可能受益于对社会关系的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信