Role of Pulmonary Function Tests to Predict Complications After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Jeremy Walder, Felipe Soto-Lanza, Lei Feng, Sairah Ahmed, Sattva Neelapu, Amy Ayers, Horiana B Grosu, Saadia A Faiz, Loretta Nastoupil, Ajay Sheshadri
{"title":"Role of Pulmonary Function Tests to Predict Complications After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.","authors":"Jeremy Walder, Felipe Soto-Lanza, Lei Feng, Sairah Ahmed, Sattva Neelapu, Amy Ayers, Horiana B Grosu, Saadia A Faiz, Loretta Nastoupil, Ajay Sheshadri","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment of certain hematologic malignancies, but toxicities limit efficacy. The role of pre-CAR-T pulmonary function testing (PFT) to predict toxicities is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to examine the association between PFTs obtained prior to CAR-T and subsequent complications in patients with lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent standard-of-care CAR-T at our institution with pretherapy PFTs. Race-neutral normative equations from the Global Lung Initiative were used to generate percent-predicted values (PPV) for spirometry and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Lung function score (LFS) was calculated by combining the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin level (cDLCO) in an equally distributed manner, with higher score denoting worse lung function. Binary logistic regression models were used to compare the association of PFTs with complications after CAR-T. Cox regression models were additionally fit to identify predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 218 individuals who underwent CAR-T therapy, 66 had PFTs performed within 12 months prior to lymphodepletion. Higher LFS was associated with higher risk of CRS (OR 4.3, 95% CI, 1.4-29, P = .048), after adjusting for lines of treatment. When adjusting for lines of treatment, both FEV<sub>1</sub> (OR = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93-0.99, P = .05) and FVC (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, P = .03) are protective for ICANS. PFT abnormalities were not associated with early or late mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of pre-CAR-T spirometry and cDLCO may help clinicians understand the risk for toxicities after CAR-T cell therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.01.019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment of certain hematologic malignancies, but toxicities limit efficacy. The role of pre-CAR-T pulmonary function testing (PFT) to predict toxicities is unclear.

Objective: Our aim was to examine the association between PFTs obtained prior to CAR-T and subsequent complications in patients with lymphoma.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent standard-of-care CAR-T at our institution with pretherapy PFTs. Race-neutral normative equations from the Global Lung Initiative were used to generate percent-predicted values (PPV) for spirometry and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Lung function score (LFS) was calculated by combining the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin level (cDLCO) in an equally distributed manner, with higher score denoting worse lung function. Binary logistic regression models were used to compare the association of PFTs with complications after CAR-T. Cox regression models were additionally fit to identify predictors of mortality.

Results: Of 218 individuals who underwent CAR-T therapy, 66 had PFTs performed within 12 months prior to lymphodepletion. Higher LFS was associated with higher risk of CRS (OR 4.3, 95% CI, 1.4-29, P = .048), after adjusting for lines of treatment. When adjusting for lines of treatment, both FEV1 (OR = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.93-0.99, P = .05) and FVC (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, P = .03) are protective for ICANS. PFT abnormalities were not associated with early or late mortality.

Conclusion: The combination of pre-CAR-T spirometry and cDLCO may help clinicians understand the risk for toxicities after CAR-T cell therapy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信