Impact of a multi-modal intervention on CTA ordering rates in patients presenting with vertigo to the emergency department.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Emergency Radiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s10140-025-02321-w
Natalie Kozlowski, Matthew J Schmitz, Marco V Istasy, Luca Simonetto, Ivan R Diamond, Audra Smallfield
{"title":"Impact of a multi-modal intervention on CTA ordering rates in patients presenting with vertigo to the emergency department.","authors":"Natalie Kozlowski, Matthew J Schmitz, Marco V Istasy, Luca Simonetto, Ivan R Diamond, Audra Smallfield","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02321-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertigo and dizziness are common complaints at emergency departments (ED), often leading to computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) studies, which when used non-selectively, have low clinical utility. The study assesses whether two quality improvement interventions (educational rounds and clinical decision making support tool) can better align CTA ordering rates with clinical practice guidelines in the ED workup of vertigo/dizziness at a large community hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CTA head and neck imaging rates were collected for patients presenting to the hospital's ED with dizziness/vertigo as the chief complaint during 6-month pre- and post-intervention periods and compared rates using the Chi-Square Test. The interventions were joint ED/Diagnostic Imaging/Stroke Neurology rounds discussing CTA head/neck indications and dissemination of a clinical decision making support tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute reduction was 5.79% (N = 4,230, p < 0.001) in CTA rates for patients presenting with dizziness/vertigo between the pre- and post-intervention periods. For vertigo, the absolute reduction was 12.27% (N = 402, p < 0.005). For dizziness, the absolute reduction was 5.17% (N = 3828, p < 0.001). Despite the global decrease in CTA studies, there was no statistically significant decrease in CTA rates for the patients who were diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack in the ED, indicating that the interventions were effective in limiting to the targeted CTA studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project was effective in improving patient safety and system efficiency, while providing a framework for low-burden, effective, practice-modifying quality improvement initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"147-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02321-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vertigo and dizziness are common complaints at emergency departments (ED), often leading to computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) studies, which when used non-selectively, have low clinical utility. The study assesses whether two quality improvement interventions (educational rounds and clinical decision making support tool) can better align CTA ordering rates with clinical practice guidelines in the ED workup of vertigo/dizziness at a large community hospital.

Methods: CTA head and neck imaging rates were collected for patients presenting to the hospital's ED with dizziness/vertigo as the chief complaint during 6-month pre- and post-intervention periods and compared rates using the Chi-Square Test. The interventions were joint ED/Diagnostic Imaging/Stroke Neurology rounds discussing CTA head/neck indications and dissemination of a clinical decision making support tool.

Results: The absolute reduction was 5.79% (N = 4,230, p < 0.001) in CTA rates for patients presenting with dizziness/vertigo between the pre- and post-intervention periods. For vertigo, the absolute reduction was 12.27% (N = 402, p < 0.005). For dizziness, the absolute reduction was 5.17% (N = 3828, p < 0.001). Despite the global decrease in CTA studies, there was no statistically significant decrease in CTA rates for the patients who were diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack in the ED, indicating that the interventions were effective in limiting to the targeted CTA studies.

Conclusions: This project was effective in improving patient safety and system efficiency, while providing a framework for low-burden, effective, practice-modifying quality improvement initiatives.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信