Consensus Building Using Modified Delphi Panel and Nominal Group Techniques for Social Prescribing Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dulce de Fátima Morais de Oliveira, Maria Adriana Pereira Henriques, Paulo Jorge Nogueira, Andreia Jorge Silva da Costa
{"title":"Consensus Building Using Modified Delphi Panel and Nominal Group Techniques for Social Prescribing Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Dulce de Fátima Morais de Oliveira,&nbsp;Maria Adriana Pereira Henriques,&nbsp;Paulo Jorge Nogueira,&nbsp;Andreia Jorge Silva da Costa","doi":"10.1155/hsc/6765353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Health interventions have been prioritised worldwide to curb the growth and life impact of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Social prescribing (SP), as a complex health intervention, has shown promise in producing positive outcomes. This study aims to establish an expert consensus on a model and SP intervention’s multicomponents to empower self-care and health literacy in T2DM patients.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A descriptive design using two consensus-building techniques took place between June and September 2023. The modified nominal group technique (NGT) was used to reach a consensus on the SP intervention model with 12 experts, who participated in two online meetings and voted on a scale of 1–9. In addition, a modified Delphi panel with 10 experts in two online rounds to reach a consensus on the intervention’s multicomponents, who rated the categories of the intervention on a Likert scale of 1–5. Consensus was reached when an agreement level ≥ 75% was obtained. The data were analysed via descriptive analysis, and the consensus level was calculated based on the mean, standard deviation and percentage.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Using the modified NGT, the experts reached a 93.52% consensus on the final model flowchart. In the modified Delphi panel’s first round, 27 original interventions were evaluated. In the second round, one was removed because of low agreement, six were revised, and five new ones were added based on participant feedback. A consensus was achieved on 30 interventions across the six categories (cross-cutting intervention components, physical activity, nutrition, medication management, self-monitoring and well-being).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both consensus techniques ensure that the SP model and these interventions meet the person’s needs and the community it serves. They allow a better understanding of self-care and health literacy strategies, contributing to future health programs and policies for more efficiently managing T2DM.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/6765353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/6765353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health interventions have been prioritised worldwide to curb the growth and life impact of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Social prescribing (SP), as a complex health intervention, has shown promise in producing positive outcomes. This study aims to establish an expert consensus on a model and SP intervention’s multicomponents to empower self-care and health literacy in T2DM patients.

Methods: A descriptive design using two consensus-building techniques took place between June and September 2023. The modified nominal group technique (NGT) was used to reach a consensus on the SP intervention model with 12 experts, who participated in two online meetings and voted on a scale of 1–9. In addition, a modified Delphi panel with 10 experts in two online rounds to reach a consensus on the intervention’s multicomponents, who rated the categories of the intervention on a Likert scale of 1–5. Consensus was reached when an agreement level ≥ 75% was obtained. The data were analysed via descriptive analysis, and the consensus level was calculated based on the mean, standard deviation and percentage.

Results: Using the modified NGT, the experts reached a 93.52% consensus on the final model flowchart. In the modified Delphi panel’s first round, 27 original interventions were evaluated. In the second round, one was removed because of low agreement, six were revised, and five new ones were added based on participant feedback. A consensus was achieved on 30 interventions across the six categories (cross-cutting intervention components, physical activity, nutrition, medication management, self-monitoring and well-being).

Conclusions: Both consensus techniques ensure that the SP model and these interventions meet the person’s needs and the community it serves. They allow a better understanding of self-care and health literacy strategies, contributing to future health programs and policies for more efficiently managing T2DM.

Abstract Image

利用改良德尔菲面板和名义群体技术建立2型糖尿病患者社会处方干预的共识
背景:在世界范围内,健康干预措施已被优先考虑,以抑制2型糖尿病(T2DM)对生长和生活的影响。社会处方作为一种复杂的保健干预措施,已显示出产生积极结果的希望。本研究旨在建立专家共识的模型和SP干预的多组件,以增强自我保健和健康素养的2型糖尿病患者。方法:在2023年6月至9月期间采用两种共识建立技术进行描述性设计。采用改进的名义群体技术(NGT)与12位专家就SP干预模型达成共识,他们参加了两次在线会议,并以1-9的等级投票。此外,一个由10名专家组成的修改后的德尔菲小组在两轮在线讨论中就干预措施的多成分达成共识,他们以1-5的李克特量表对干预措施的类别进行评级。当一致性水平≥75%时,达成共识。通过描述性分析对数据进行分析,并根据平均值、标准差和百分比计算共识水平。结果:使用改进的NGT,专家对最终模型流程图的一致性达到93.52%。在改进的德尔菲小组的第一轮,27个原始干预措施进行了评估。在第二轮中,由于一致性低,删除了一个,修改了六个,根据参与者的反馈增加了五个。就六类(交叉干预成分、身体活动、营养、药物管理、自我监测和福祉)的30项干预措施达成了共识。结论:共识技术确保SP模型和这些干预措施满足个人需求和它所服务的社区。它们有助于更好地理解自我保健和健康素养战略,有助于未来更有效地管理2型糖尿病的健康计划和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信