{"title":"Unpacking “the surprise chain”: the governance of food security during the COVID-19 pandemic in Melbourne, Australia","authors":"Rachel Carey, Maureen Murphy","doi":"10.1007/s10460-024-10629-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food systems are being affected by multiple shocks related to climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical events. Food prices and food insecurity are rising globally as a result, raising questions about the effective governance of food security during shocks. This paper critically examines the governance of food security in Melbourne, Australia during a major food system shock, the COVID-19 pandemic. It draws on document analysis and 34 stakeholder interviews with 41 participants from government, industry and civil society between May 2020 and March 2021. The paper examines the role of these actors in governance mechanisms for two important aspects of food system governance during the COVID-19 pandemic, continuity of food supply and delivery of emergency food relief. Clark et al.’s (2021) “governance engagement continuum” is used to show how civil society groups were excluded from these formal governance mechanisms, instead establishing their own spaces of “self-governance”. The resilience aims associated with these governance mechanisms are also analyzed using Zurek et al.’s (2022) “three R’s” (robustness, recovery and reorientation) framework. Our study highlights the significant role of food industry actors in the continuity of food supply and delivery of emergency food relief, and it shows the vulnerabilities of emergency food relief that depends on industry food “surpluses” as a model for addressing food insecurity during food system shocks. We conclude that greater government leadership is needed in the governance of food security during food system shocks, and in implementation of legislative and policy approaches that are grounded in the human right to food.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 1","pages":"107 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-024-10629-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-024-10629-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Food systems are being affected by multiple shocks related to climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical events. Food prices and food insecurity are rising globally as a result, raising questions about the effective governance of food security during shocks. This paper critically examines the governance of food security in Melbourne, Australia during a major food system shock, the COVID-19 pandemic. It draws on document analysis and 34 stakeholder interviews with 41 participants from government, industry and civil society between May 2020 and March 2021. The paper examines the role of these actors in governance mechanisms for two important aspects of food system governance during the COVID-19 pandemic, continuity of food supply and delivery of emergency food relief. Clark et al.’s (2021) “governance engagement continuum” is used to show how civil society groups were excluded from these formal governance mechanisms, instead establishing their own spaces of “self-governance”. The resilience aims associated with these governance mechanisms are also analyzed using Zurek et al.’s (2022) “three R’s” (robustness, recovery and reorientation) framework. Our study highlights the significant role of food industry actors in the continuity of food supply and delivery of emergency food relief, and it shows the vulnerabilities of emergency food relief that depends on industry food “surpluses” as a model for addressing food insecurity during food system shocks. We conclude that greater government leadership is needed in the governance of food security during food system shocks, and in implementation of legislative and policy approaches that are grounded in the human right to food.
粮食系统正受到与气候变化、2019冠状病毒病大流行和地缘政治事件有关的多重冲击的影响。因此,粮食价格和粮食不安全在全球范围内不断上升,这引发了人们对冲击期间有效治理粮食安全的质疑。本文批判性地考察了澳大利亚墨尔本在2019冠状病毒病大流行这一重大粮食系统冲击期间的粮食安全治理。它借鉴了2020年5月至2021年3月期间对41名来自政府、行业和民间社会的参与者进行的34次利益攸关方访谈和文件分析。本文考察了这些行为体在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间粮食系统治理的两个重要方面的治理机制中的作用,即粮食供应的连续性和紧急粮食救济的提供。Clark et al.(2021)的“治理参与连续体”被用来展示公民社会团体如何被排除在这些正式的治理机制之外,而是建立自己的“自治”空间。与这些治理机制相关的弹性目标也使用Zurek等人(2022)的“三个R”(稳健性、恢复性和再定向)框架进行了分析。我们的研究强调了食品行业参与者在食品供应连续性和紧急食品救济交付方面的重要作用,并显示了紧急食品救济的脆弱性,这种脆弱性依赖于行业食品“盈余”作为解决粮食系统冲击期间粮食不安全问题的模型。我们的结论是,在粮食系统冲击期间的粮食安全治理方面,以及在实施以食物权为基础的立法和政策方法方面,需要政府发挥更大的领导作用。
期刊介绍:
Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems.
To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.