Survey on Pain Detection Using Machine Learning Models: Narrative Review.

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.2196/53026
Ruijie Fang, Elahe Hosseini, Ruoyu Zhang, Chongzhou Fang, Setareh Rafatirad, Houman Homayoun
{"title":"Survey on Pain Detection Using Machine Learning Models: Narrative Review.","authors":"Ruijie Fang, Elahe Hosseini, Ruoyu Zhang, Chongzhou Fang, Setareh Rafatirad, Houman Homayoun","doi":"10.2196/53026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain, a leading reason people seek medical care, has become a social issue. Automated pain assessment has seen notable advancements over recent decades, addressing a critical need in both clinical and everyday settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this survey was to provide a comprehensive overview of pain and its mechanisms, to explore existing research on automated pain recognition modalities, and to identify key challenges and future directions in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted, analyzing studies focused on various modalities for automated pain recognition. The modalities reviewed include facial expressions, physiological signals, audio cues, and pupil dilation, with a focus on their efficacy and application in pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey found that each modality offers unique contributions to automated pain recognition, with facial expressions and physiological signals showing particular promise. However, the reliability and accuracy of these modalities vary, often depending on factors such as individual variability and environmental conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While automated pain recognition has progressed considerably, challenges remain in achieving consistent accuracy across diverse populations and contexts. Future research directions are suggested to address these challenges, enhancing the reliability and applicability of automated pain assessment in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"4 ","pages":"e53026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain, a leading reason people seek medical care, has become a social issue. Automated pain assessment has seen notable advancements over recent decades, addressing a critical need in both clinical and everyday settings.

Objective: The objective of this survey was to provide a comprehensive overview of pain and its mechanisms, to explore existing research on automated pain recognition modalities, and to identify key challenges and future directions in this field.

Methods: A literature review was conducted, analyzing studies focused on various modalities for automated pain recognition. The modalities reviewed include facial expressions, physiological signals, audio cues, and pupil dilation, with a focus on their efficacy and application in pain assessment.

Results: The survey found that each modality offers unique contributions to automated pain recognition, with facial expressions and physiological signals showing particular promise. However, the reliability and accuracy of these modalities vary, often depending on factors such as individual variability and environmental conditions.

Conclusions: While automated pain recognition has progressed considerably, challenges remain in achieving consistent accuracy across diverse populations and contexts. Future research directions are suggested to address these challenges, enhancing the reliability and applicability of automated pain assessment in clinical practice.

使用机器学习模型的疼痛检测研究综述。
背景:疼痛作为人们就医的主要原因,已经成为一个社会问题。近几十年来,自动化疼痛评估取得了显著进展,解决了临床和日常环境中的关键需求。目的:本调查的目的是提供疼痛及其机制的全面概述,探讨现有的研究疼痛自动识别模式,并确定该领域的关键挑战和未来的发展方向。方法:通过文献综述,分析各种疼痛自动识别方法的研究成果。回顾了包括面部表情、生理信号、音频线索和瞳孔扩张在内的模式,重点介绍了它们在疼痛评估中的功效和应用。结果:调查发现,每种模式对自动疼痛识别都有独特的贡献,面部表情和生理信号显示出特别的前景。然而,这些模式的可靠性和准确性各不相同,通常取决于个人变异性和环境条件等因素。结论:虽然自动化疼痛识别已经取得了相当大的进展,但在不同人群和环境中实现一致的准确性仍然存在挑战。未来的研究方向是解决这些挑战,提高疼痛自动评估在临床实践中的可靠性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信