Lauren Nicola-Ducey, Lucy Ward, Amanda Holland, Sara Cichowski, Emily Boniface, W Thomas Gregory
{"title":"Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge With Enhanced Education During Pregnancy.","authors":"Lauren Nicola-Ducey, Lucy Ward, Amanda Holland, Sara Cichowski, Emily Boniface, W Thomas Gregory","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prior to delivery, there are postpartum pelvic floor recovery topics to provide education on; however, because of a variety of factors, the majority of these are commonly unaddressed, leaving a patient unknowledgeable and unsatisfied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to determine if providing tailored/targeted pelvic floor disorder education in the peripartum period will improve nulliparous patients' knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). Our secondary aim was to evaluate if a difference exists in patient satisfaction and understanding.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a single-site nonrandomized interventional study evaluating pregnant patients currently enrolled in an interactive electronic educational platform. We evaluated the change in Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) scores at 26-27 weeks antepartum and 6 weeks postpartum in 2 separate cohorts, before and after our education intervention was implemented. We also compared the magnitude of the change in PIKQ scores between the nonintervention and intervention postpartum cohorts as our primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared the change in PIKQ mean scores between the control and intervention cohorts and found no statistical difference in change of UI (0.1 ± 1.8 vs 0.5 ± 1.9, P = 0.218) or POP knowledge (0.9 ± 2.5 vs 0.8 ± 2.4, P = 0.681). In addition, no significant change was detected in mean PIKQ UI scores for the control group between the antepartum and postpartum period (9.9 ± 2.4 vs 10.1 ± 2.1, P = 0.445), but there was a statistically significant change in POP knowledge scores (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 7.9 ± 3.1, P < 0.001). In the intervention cohort, there was a statistically significant change in both UI (9.3 ± 2.6 vs 9.8 ± 2.2, P = 0.012) and POP knowledge scores (6.7 ± 3.4 vs 7.5 ± 3.2, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not detect a significant difference in mean score change between our cohorts following implementation of a targeted educational intervention using an online educational platform. However, both cohorts had higher than anticipated baseline knowledge on pelvic floor disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Prior to delivery, there are postpartum pelvic floor recovery topics to provide education on; however, because of a variety of factors, the majority of these are commonly unaddressed, leaving a patient unknowledgeable and unsatisfied.
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to determine if providing tailored/targeted pelvic floor disorder education in the peripartum period will improve nulliparous patients' knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). Our secondary aim was to evaluate if a difference exists in patient satisfaction and understanding.
Study design: This was a single-site nonrandomized interventional study evaluating pregnant patients currently enrolled in an interactive electronic educational platform. We evaluated the change in Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) scores at 26-27 weeks antepartum and 6 weeks postpartum in 2 separate cohorts, before and after our education intervention was implemented. We also compared the magnitude of the change in PIKQ scores between the nonintervention and intervention postpartum cohorts as our primary outcome.
Results: We compared the change in PIKQ mean scores between the control and intervention cohorts and found no statistical difference in change of UI (0.1 ± 1.8 vs 0.5 ± 1.9, P = 0.218) or POP knowledge (0.9 ± 2.5 vs 0.8 ± 2.4, P = 0.681). In addition, no significant change was detected in mean PIKQ UI scores for the control group between the antepartum and postpartum period (9.9 ± 2.4 vs 10.1 ± 2.1, P = 0.445), but there was a statistically significant change in POP knowledge scores (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 7.9 ± 3.1, P < 0.001). In the intervention cohort, there was a statistically significant change in both UI (9.3 ± 2.6 vs 9.8 ± 2.2, P = 0.012) and POP knowledge scores (6.7 ± 3.4 vs 7.5 ± 3.2, P = 0.001).
Conclusions: We did not detect a significant difference in mean score change between our cohorts following implementation of a targeted educational intervention using an online educational platform. However, both cohorts had higher than anticipated baseline knowledge on pelvic floor disorders.
重要性:分娩前,有产后盆底恢复主题提供教育;然而,由于各种各样的因素,这些问题中的大多数通常没有得到解决,使患者不了解和不满意。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定围生期提供量身定制/有针对性的盆底疾病教育是否会提高未生育患者对盆腔器官脱垂(POP)和尿失禁(UI)的认识。我们的第二个目的是评估在患者满意度和理解方面是否存在差异。研究设计:这是一项单站点非随机介入性研究,评估目前在交互式电子教育平台注册的孕妇。在实施教育干预之前和之后,我们评估了2个独立队列在产前26-27周和产后6周脱垂和尿失禁知识问卷(PIKQ)得分的变化。我们还比较了未干预组和干预组之间PIKQ评分的变化幅度作为我们的主要结局。结果:我们比较了对照组和干预组PIKQ平均得分的变化,发现UI(0.1±1.8 vs 0.5±1.9,P = 0.218)和POP知识(0.9±2.5 vs 0.8±2.4,P = 0.681)的变化无统计学差异。对照组产前、产后PIKQ UI平均得分(9.9±2.4 vs 10.1±2.1,P = 0.445)差异无统计学意义,而POP知识得分(7.0±3.3 vs 7.9±3.1,P < 0.001)差异有统计学意义。干预组患者UI(9.3±2.6 vs 9.8±2.2,P = 0.012)和POP知识评分(6.7±3.4 vs 7.5±3.2,P = 0.001)差异均有统计学意义。结论:我们没有发现在使用在线教育平台实施有针对性的教育干预后,我们的队列之间的平均得分变化有显著差异。然而,两个队列对盆底疾病的基线知识都高于预期。