The Controlled Release of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Alginate Repairs Muscle Damage With Less Fibrosis.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
William Kenzo Felipone, Luana de Mambro, Beatrice Rodrigues Ranieri, Giovana Zaneti Ivanov, Robert Meves, Leonardo Martins, Roberta Sessa Stilhano
{"title":"The Controlled Release of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Loaded Alginate Repairs Muscle Damage With Less Fibrosis.","authors":"William Kenzo Felipone, Luana de Mambro, Beatrice Rodrigues Ranieri, Giovana Zaneti Ivanov, Robert Meves, Leonardo Martins, Roberta Sessa Stilhano","doi":"10.1177/03635465251321108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscle injuries often result in dysfunctional muscle repair and reduced muscle strength. While platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a new treatment option in orthopaedics, its use for muscle injuries remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Encapsulating PRP within alginate hydrogels will achieve a localized and sustained release of growth factors at the site of the muscle injury, thereby enhancing skeletal muscle repair and reducing fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bimodal blends of hydrogels were formulated using 1% oxidized high- and low-molecular weight alginate. There were 2 types of PRP prepared: leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and pure PRP (P-PRP). These PRP types were loaded onto 75L25H alginate hydrogels, and the release of TGF-β1 was quantified over time. A laceration injury was induced in mice, which was then treated with various agents: alginate only, L-PRP, L-PRP-loaded alginate (L-PRPA), P-PRP, and P-PRP-loaded alginate (P-PRPA). An additional 2 groups were formed: injury with no treatment and control with no treatment or injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our in vitro experiments showed that after an initial burst, TGF-β1 was released in a sustained manner for approximately 1 week after the encapsulation of both PRP preparations. The in vivo experiments showed that the groups treated with bolus injections of L-PRP or P-PRP did not show significant changes in the fibrotic area. However, the L-PRPA and P-PRPA groups demonstrated a 50% reduction in the fibrotic area (<i>P</i> < .05), resulting in a higher ratio of regenerating myofibers and higher levels of myogenic markers (myogenin and MyHC-emb) compared with all the other groups (<i>P</i> < .05). The L-PRPA group demonstrated significantly improved performance on the rotarod test; interestingly, this group also had more type I collagen than type III collagen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of L-PRP and P-PRP after a muscle injury did not reduce fibrosis. However, when loaded onto alginate hydrogels, they led to benefits, resulting in a smaller area of fibrosis and greater tissue regeneration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The encapsulation of different preparations of PRP by alginate hydrogels was more effective in treating muscle lacerations than injections of PRP alone. This information is relevant for future clinical studies of PRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3635465251321108"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251321108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Muscle injuries often result in dysfunctional muscle repair and reduced muscle strength. While platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a new treatment option in orthopaedics, its use for muscle injuries remains controversial.

Hypothesis: Encapsulating PRP within alginate hydrogels will achieve a localized and sustained release of growth factors at the site of the muscle injury, thereby enhancing skeletal muscle repair and reducing fibrosis.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Bimodal blends of hydrogels were formulated using 1% oxidized high- and low-molecular weight alginate. There were 2 types of PRP prepared: leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and pure PRP (P-PRP). These PRP types were loaded onto 75L25H alginate hydrogels, and the release of TGF-β1 was quantified over time. A laceration injury was induced in mice, which was then treated with various agents: alginate only, L-PRP, L-PRP-loaded alginate (L-PRPA), P-PRP, and P-PRP-loaded alginate (P-PRPA). An additional 2 groups were formed: injury with no treatment and control with no treatment or injury.

Results: Our in vitro experiments showed that after an initial burst, TGF-β1 was released in a sustained manner for approximately 1 week after the encapsulation of both PRP preparations. The in vivo experiments showed that the groups treated with bolus injections of L-PRP or P-PRP did not show significant changes in the fibrotic area. However, the L-PRPA and P-PRPA groups demonstrated a 50% reduction in the fibrotic area (P < .05), resulting in a higher ratio of regenerating myofibers and higher levels of myogenic markers (myogenin and MyHC-emb) compared with all the other groups (P < .05). The L-PRPA group demonstrated significantly improved performance on the rotarod test; interestingly, this group also had more type I collagen than type III collagen.

Conclusion: The administration of L-PRP and P-PRP after a muscle injury did not reduce fibrosis. However, when loaded onto alginate hydrogels, they led to benefits, resulting in a smaller area of fibrosis and greater tissue regeneration.

Clinical relevance: The encapsulation of different preparations of PRP by alginate hydrogels was more effective in treating muscle lacerations than injections of PRP alone. This information is relevant for future clinical studies of PRP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信