Background suppression single-shot electrocardiogram trigger non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in lower extremity blood vessels: a comparative study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1120
Qian Zhang, He Cao, Xin-Qiang Han, Xiu-Zheng Yue, Wen-Ming Wang, Lu-Ying Ni, Wen-Ju Cui, Chang-Jin Bao, Xing-Yue Jiang
{"title":"Background suppression single-shot electrocardiogram trigger non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in lower extremity blood vessels: a comparative study.","authors":"Qian Zhang, He Cao, Xin-Qiang Han, Xiu-Zheng Yue, Wen-Ming Wang, Lu-Ying Ni, Wen-Ju Cui, Chang-Jin Bao, Xing-Yue Jiang","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Background suppression single-shot electrocardiogram trigger non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (BASS-TRANCE) is a recently introduced non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) technique. It was reported to be a practical test for the evaluation of peripheral artery disease (PAD) with an imaging performance comparable to that of the known NCE-MRA technique quiescent interval single-shot (QISS). However, its performance compared to the most commonly used diagnostic methods for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains unclear. Using DSA as the test standard, this study evaluated the image quality and clinical diagnostic accuracy of BASS-TRANCE and CTA in PAD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BASS-TRANCE, CTA, and DSA were examined successively in 30 patients with PAD. Two senior physicians scored the image quality of CTA and BASS-TRANCE using the 3-point method, and the images of both were evaluated according to the 5-level stenosis evaluation method. Either paired <i>t</i>-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference of image quality between the two groups. Using DSA results as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CTA and BASS-TRANCE for lower limb artery stenosis >50% were calculated by McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 570 segments, 12 (2.1%) and 42 (7.4%) inconclusive segments were excluded from BASS-TRANCE and CTA analysis, respectively (P<0.05). The DSA results were available for 392 of the remaining segments. Among the 516 vessels with reliable image quality, there was no significant difference in scores between BASS-TRANCE {2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.36-2.47]} and CTA [2.39 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45); P>0.05]. Furthermore, BASS-TRANCE demonstrated significant efficacy in detecting vascular stenosis with a sensitivity of 92.8% and specificity of 96.1%, which were comparable to those achieved by CTA (94.9% and 96.8%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As an NCE-MRA technique, BASS-TRANCE can display the lower extremity vessels in a short time; it is expected to replace CTA as a safe and effective examination method for PAD patients in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 2","pages":"1312-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Background suppression single-shot electrocardiogram trigger non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (BASS-TRANCE) is a recently introduced non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) technique. It was reported to be a practical test for the evaluation of peripheral artery disease (PAD) with an imaging performance comparable to that of the known NCE-MRA technique quiescent interval single-shot (QISS). However, its performance compared to the most commonly used diagnostic methods for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains unclear. Using DSA as the test standard, this study evaluated the image quality and clinical diagnostic accuracy of BASS-TRANCE and CTA in PAD patients.

Methods: BASS-TRANCE, CTA, and DSA were examined successively in 30 patients with PAD. Two senior physicians scored the image quality of CTA and BASS-TRANCE using the 3-point method, and the images of both were evaluated according to the 5-level stenosis evaluation method. Either paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference of image quality between the two groups. Using DSA results as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CTA and BASS-TRANCE for lower limb artery stenosis >50% were calculated by McNemar's test.

Results: Of 570 segments, 12 (2.1%) and 42 (7.4%) inconclusive segments were excluded from BASS-TRANCE and CTA analysis, respectively (P<0.05). The DSA results were available for 392 of the remaining segments. Among the 516 vessels with reliable image quality, there was no significant difference in scores between BASS-TRANCE {2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.36-2.47]} and CTA [2.39 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45); P>0.05]. Furthermore, BASS-TRANCE demonstrated significant efficacy in detecting vascular stenosis with a sensitivity of 92.8% and specificity of 96.1%, which were comparable to those achieved by CTA (94.9% and 96.8%, respectively).

Conclusions: As an NCE-MRA technique, BASS-TRANCE can display the lower extremity vessels in a short time; it is expected to replace CTA as a safe and effective examination method for PAD patients in the future.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信