Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jonas Widmer, Anna Schuler, Anna-Katharina Calek, Agnese Beretta-Piccoli, Oliver Wigger, Reto Graf, Luca Kiener, Ramon Rohner, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad
{"title":"Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques.","authors":"Jonas Widmer, Anna Schuler, Anna-Katharina Calek, Agnese Beretta-Piccoli, Oliver Wigger, Reto Graf, Luca Kiener, Ramon Rohner, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Challenges of vertebropexy such as spinous process fractures and tendon pull-out under high flexion loads need to be further investigated to ensure long-term stability of the construct.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertebropexy is a technique using a tendon as a posterior tension band to stabilize vertebral segments. Failure modes include pull-out or spinous process fractures under high flexion loads. This study simulates physiological risk loads in a biomechanical test to compare different interspinous vertebropexy techniques STUDY DESIGN: : Biomechanical cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EIGHTEEN VERTEBRAL SEGMENTS WERE STABILIZED USING BOVINE FLEXOR TENDONS WITH THREE METHODS: \"Tunnel only\" (twice through spinous process holes), \"Tunnel + cortical wrapping\" (once through holes, once around spinous processes), and \"Cortical wrapping only\" (twice around spinous processes). Segments were subjected to cyclic, load-controlled flexion until failure. Force differences, bone failure modes, and the impact of bone quality on spinous process resistance were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"Cortical wrapping only\" technique achieved the highest mean torque (25.8 Nm), significantly outperforming the \"Tunnel only\" technique (13.4 Nm; p=0.024). The \"Tunnel + cortical wrapping\" technique (18.1 Nm) showed no significant difference from either \"Tunnel only\" or \"Cortical wrapping only\" (p=0.700; p=0.190). Bone failure modes, such as tendon cutting into bone and spinous process fractures, were consistent across technique. Bone density influenced failure resistance only in techniques involving cortical wrapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"Cortical wrapping only\" method doubled the failure loads compared to the \"Tunnel only\" method while avoiding common failure modes like spinous process fractures. Additionally, bone density is a crucial factor to consider when using cortical bone as an abutment for the vertebropexy loop.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study proposes alternative vertebropexy techniques to enhance spinal stabilization and minimize failure risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.02.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Challenges of vertebropexy such as spinous process fractures and tendon pull-out under high flexion loads need to be further investigated to ensure long-term stability of the construct.

Purpose: Vertebropexy is a technique using a tendon as a posterior tension band to stabilize vertebral segments. Failure modes include pull-out or spinous process fractures under high flexion loads. This study simulates physiological risk loads in a biomechanical test to compare different interspinous vertebropexy techniques STUDY DESIGN: : Biomechanical cadaveric study.

Methods: EIGHTEEN VERTEBRAL SEGMENTS WERE STABILIZED USING BOVINE FLEXOR TENDONS WITH THREE METHODS: "Tunnel only" (twice through spinous process holes), "Tunnel + cortical wrapping" (once through holes, once around spinous processes), and "Cortical wrapping only" (twice around spinous processes). Segments were subjected to cyclic, load-controlled flexion until failure. Force differences, bone failure modes, and the impact of bone quality on spinous process resistance were evaluated and compared.

Results: The "Cortical wrapping only" technique achieved the highest mean torque (25.8 Nm), significantly outperforming the "Tunnel only" technique (13.4 Nm; p=0.024). The "Tunnel + cortical wrapping" technique (18.1 Nm) showed no significant difference from either "Tunnel only" or "Cortical wrapping only" (p=0.700; p=0.190). Bone failure modes, such as tendon cutting into bone and spinous process fractures, were consistent across technique. Bone density influenced failure resistance only in techniques involving cortical wrapping.

Conclusions: The "Cortical wrapping only" method doubled the failure loads compared to the "Tunnel only" method while avoiding common failure modes like spinous process fractures. Additionally, bone density is a crucial factor to consider when using cortical bone as an abutment for the vertebropexy loop.

Clinical significance: This study proposes alternative vertebropexy techniques to enhance spinal stabilization and minimize failure risks.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信