Jonas Widmer, Anna Schuler, Anna-Katharina Calek, Agnese Beretta-Piccoli, Oliver Wigger, Reto Graf, Luca Kiener, Ramon Rohner, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad
{"title":"Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques.","authors":"Jonas Widmer, Anna Schuler, Anna-Katharina Calek, Agnese Beretta-Piccoli, Oliver Wigger, Reto Graf, Luca Kiener, Ramon Rohner, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Mazda Farshad","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Challenges of vertebropexy such as spinous process fractures and tendon pull-out under high flexion loads need to be further investigated to ensure long-term stability of the construct.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertebropexy is a technique using a tendon as a posterior tension band to stabilize vertebral segments. Failure modes include pull-out or spinous process fractures under high flexion loads. This study simulates physiological risk loads in a biomechanical test to compare different interspinous vertebropexy techniques STUDY DESIGN: : Biomechanical cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EIGHTEEN VERTEBRAL SEGMENTS WERE STABILIZED USING BOVINE FLEXOR TENDONS WITH THREE METHODS: \"Tunnel only\" (twice through spinous process holes), \"Tunnel + cortical wrapping\" (once through holes, once around spinous processes), and \"Cortical wrapping only\" (twice around spinous processes). Segments were subjected to cyclic, load-controlled flexion until failure. Force differences, bone failure modes, and the impact of bone quality on spinous process resistance were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The \"Cortical wrapping only\" technique achieved the highest mean torque (25.8 Nm), significantly outperforming the \"Tunnel only\" technique (13.4 Nm; p=0.024). The \"Tunnel + cortical wrapping\" technique (18.1 Nm) showed no significant difference from either \"Tunnel only\" or \"Cortical wrapping only\" (p=0.700; p=0.190). Bone failure modes, such as tendon cutting into bone and spinous process fractures, were consistent across technique. Bone density influenced failure resistance only in techniques involving cortical wrapping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The \"Cortical wrapping only\" method doubled the failure loads compared to the \"Tunnel only\" method while avoiding common failure modes like spinous process fractures. Additionally, bone density is a crucial factor to consider when using cortical bone as an abutment for the vertebropexy loop.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study proposes alternative vertebropexy techniques to enhance spinal stabilization and minimize failure risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.02.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Challenges of vertebropexy such as spinous process fractures and tendon pull-out under high flexion loads need to be further investigated to ensure long-term stability of the construct.
Purpose: Vertebropexy is a technique using a tendon as a posterior tension band to stabilize vertebral segments. Failure modes include pull-out or spinous process fractures under high flexion loads. This study simulates physiological risk loads in a biomechanical test to compare different interspinous vertebropexy techniques STUDY DESIGN: : Biomechanical cadaveric study.
Methods: EIGHTEEN VERTEBRAL SEGMENTS WERE STABILIZED USING BOVINE FLEXOR TENDONS WITH THREE METHODS: "Tunnel only" (twice through spinous process holes), "Tunnel + cortical wrapping" (once through holes, once around spinous processes), and "Cortical wrapping only" (twice around spinous processes). Segments were subjected to cyclic, load-controlled flexion until failure. Force differences, bone failure modes, and the impact of bone quality on spinous process resistance were evaluated and compared.
Results: The "Cortical wrapping only" technique achieved the highest mean torque (25.8 Nm), significantly outperforming the "Tunnel only" technique (13.4 Nm; p=0.024). The "Tunnel + cortical wrapping" technique (18.1 Nm) showed no significant difference from either "Tunnel only" or "Cortical wrapping only" (p=0.700; p=0.190). Bone failure modes, such as tendon cutting into bone and spinous process fractures, were consistent across technique. Bone density influenced failure resistance only in techniques involving cortical wrapping.
Conclusions: The "Cortical wrapping only" method doubled the failure loads compared to the "Tunnel only" method while avoiding common failure modes like spinous process fractures. Additionally, bone density is a crucial factor to consider when using cortical bone as an abutment for the vertebropexy loop.
Clinical significance: This study proposes alternative vertebropexy techniques to enhance spinal stabilization and minimize failure risks.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.