{"title":"Collagen Injections for Rotator Cuff Diseases: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Rocco Aicale, Eugenio Savarese, Rosita Mottola, Bruno Corrado, Felice Sirico, Raffaello Pellegrino, Danilo Donati, Roberto Tedeschi, Luca Ruosi, Domiziano Tarantino","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15020028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because of its anatomy and function, the rotator cuff (RC) is vulnerable to considerable morbidity. The prevalence of RC diseases (RCDs) among the general population is 5-39%, reaching over 30% in patients older than 60. The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the effects of the use of collagen injections in the treatment of RCDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of scientific electronic databases (such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed up to November 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent authors conducted the search and assessed the articles. The inter-rater reliability for the quality assessment was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, while the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the articles included in this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight articles were included, with the overall quality of the included articles being evaluated as fair. Despite the use of different types of collagen and injection protocols, as well as the different scores applied, each included study showed clinically relevant improvements. However, given the high degree of heterogeneity of the included studies, we cannot draw conclusions regarding which type of collagen and injection protocol are best for RCD treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Collagen administration for RCDs seems to be effective at reducing pain and improving function, as well as the tendon structure, especially in partial tears and RC tendinopathy. High-quality, prospective studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to validate the findings of the articles included in this systematic review.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15020028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Because of its anatomy and function, the rotator cuff (RC) is vulnerable to considerable morbidity. The prevalence of RC diseases (RCDs) among the general population is 5-39%, reaching over 30% in patients older than 60. The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the effects of the use of collagen injections in the treatment of RCDs.
Methods: A systematic search of scientific electronic databases (such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed up to November 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent authors conducted the search and assessed the articles. The inter-rater reliability for the quality assessment was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, while the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the articles included in this systematic review.
Results: A total of eight articles were included, with the overall quality of the included articles being evaluated as fair. Despite the use of different types of collagen and injection protocols, as well as the different scores applied, each included study showed clinically relevant improvements. However, given the high degree of heterogeneity of the included studies, we cannot draw conclusions regarding which type of collagen and injection protocol are best for RCD treatment.
Discussion: Collagen administration for RCDs seems to be effective at reducing pain and improving function, as well as the tendon structure, especially in partial tears and RC tendinopathy. High-quality, prospective studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to validate the findings of the articles included in this systematic review.
背景:由于其解剖结构和功能,肩袖(RC)很容易出现相当大的发病率。RC疾病(rcd)在普通人群中的患病率为5-39%,在60岁以上的患者中达到30%以上。本系统综述的目的是研究使用胶原蛋白注射剂治疗rcd的效果。方法:系统检索科学电子数据库(如PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science),直至2024年11月,遵循系统评价和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。两位独立作者对文章进行了搜索和评估。质量评价的评等者间信度采用Cohen’s kappa系数测量,而修正Coleman方法学评分(CMS)则用于评价本系统评价中纳入的文章的方法学质量。结果:共纳入8篇文献,纳入文献的总体质量评价为一般。尽管使用不同类型的胶原蛋白和注射方案,以及应用不同的评分,每个纳入的研究都显示出临床相关的改善。然而,考虑到纳入研究的高度异质性,我们无法得出关于哪种类型的胶原蛋白和注射方案最适合RCD治疗的结论。讨论:rcd的胶原管理似乎在减轻疼痛和改善功能以及肌腱结构方面有效,特别是在部分撕裂和RC肌腱病变中。需要高质量的、长期随访的前瞻性研究来验证本系统综述中文章的发现。