Vision-Based Collision Warning Systems with Deep Learning: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Charith Chitraranjan, Vipooshan Vipulananthan, Thuvarakan Sritharan
{"title":"Vision-Based Collision Warning Systems with Deep Learning: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Charith Chitraranjan, Vipooshan Vipulananthan, Thuvarakan Sritharan","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11020064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely prediction of collisions enables advanced driver assistance systems to issue warnings and initiate emergency maneuvers as needed to avoid collisions. With recent developments in computer vision and deep learning, collision warning systems that use vision as the only sensory input have emerged. They are less expensive than those that use multiple sensors, but their effectiveness must be thoroughly assessed. We systematically searched academic literature for studies proposing ego-centric, vision-based collision warning systems that use deep learning techniques. Thirty-one studies among the search results satisfied our inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with PROBAST. We reviewed the selected studies and answer three primary questions: What are the (1) deep learning techniques used and how are they used? (2) datasets and experiments used to evaluate? (3) results achieved? We identified two main categories of methods: Those that use deep learning models to directly predict the probability of a future collision from input video, and those that use deep learning models at one or more stages of a pipeline to compute a threat metric before predicting collisions. More importantly, we show that the experimental evaluation of most systems is inadequate due to either not performing quantitative experiments or various biases present in the datasets used. Lack of suitable datasets is a major challenge to the evaluation of these systems and we suggest future work to address this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11020064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely prediction of collisions enables advanced driver assistance systems to issue warnings and initiate emergency maneuvers as needed to avoid collisions. With recent developments in computer vision and deep learning, collision warning systems that use vision as the only sensory input have emerged. They are less expensive than those that use multiple sensors, but their effectiveness must be thoroughly assessed. We systematically searched academic literature for studies proposing ego-centric, vision-based collision warning systems that use deep learning techniques. Thirty-one studies among the search results satisfied our inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with PROBAST. We reviewed the selected studies and answer three primary questions: What are the (1) deep learning techniques used and how are they used? (2) datasets and experiments used to evaluate? (3) results achieved? We identified two main categories of methods: Those that use deep learning models to directly predict the probability of a future collision from input video, and those that use deep learning models at one or more stages of a pipeline to compute a threat metric before predicting collisions. More importantly, we show that the experimental evaluation of most systems is inadequate due to either not performing quantitative experiments or various biases present in the datasets used. Lack of suitable datasets is a major challenge to the evaluation of these systems and we suggest future work to address this issue.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信