Differentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas: Our Experience with Visual Analysis of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Luz Maria Moran, Chao Yuan Li Cai, Alberto Ramirez, Ana Royuela
{"title":"Differentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas: Our Experience with Visual Analysis of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Luz Maria Moran, Chao Yuan Li Cai, Alberto Ramirez, Ana Royuela","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11020047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) from lipomas using imaging techniques is a challenge, and the biopsy with immunohistochemical determination of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) oncogene is the gold standard. We are looking for a management algorithm with the visual analysis of magnetic resonance images in these two fatty soft tissue tumors that allow us to avoid some biopsies. Two radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently assessed various features on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in 79 patients with pathologically confirmed fatty tumors as either lipoma (MDM2 negative) or ALT (MDM2 positive). Results: The interobserver agreement for the most MRI features was moderate and the musculoskeletal radiologist accuracy for final diagnosis was 90% sensitivity and 66% specificity. Tumors with homogeneous fat signals and a maximum size < 8 cm were always lipomas (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the tumors with septa thickness ≥ 2 mm, or more than one non-fat nodule, and a maximum size ≥ 12.8 cm were typically ALTs. While those tumors with septa < 2 mm or one non-fat nodule, independently of maximum size, the diagnosis of lipoma versus ALT is uncertain and a biopsy is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11020047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) from lipomas using imaging techniques is a challenge, and the biopsy with immunohistochemical determination of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) oncogene is the gold standard. We are looking for a management algorithm with the visual analysis of magnetic resonance images in these two fatty soft tissue tumors that allow us to avoid some biopsies. Two radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently assessed various features on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in 79 patients with pathologically confirmed fatty tumors as either lipoma (MDM2 negative) or ALT (MDM2 positive). Results: The interobserver agreement for the most MRI features was moderate and the musculoskeletal radiologist accuracy for final diagnosis was 90% sensitivity and 66% specificity. Tumors with homogeneous fat signals and a maximum size < 8 cm were always lipomas (p < 0.001), and the tumors with septa thickness ≥ 2 mm, or more than one non-fat nodule, and a maximum size ≥ 12.8 cm were typically ALTs. While those tumors with septa < 2 mm or one non-fat nodule, independently of maximum size, the diagnosis of lipoma versus ALT is uncertain and a biopsy is required.

非典型脂肪瘤与脂肪瘤的鉴别:我们对传统磁共振成像进行视觉分析的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信