Diagnostic Performance of Gene Expression and dd-cfDNA in Multiorgan Transplant Recipients.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001772
Ziad S Zaky, Stephanie A Clifford, James N Fleming
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Gene Expression and dd-cfDNA in Multiorgan Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Ziad S Zaky, Stephanie A Clifford, James N Fleming","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this analysis was to evaluate early signals of the utility of gene expression profile (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for ruling out subclinical rejection in multiorgan transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center, observational pilot study that began enrolling patients in September 2022. Participants were enrolled after providing informed consent and had biomarker samples drawn before surveillance or for-cause biopsy. GEP result of TX was considered negative and a dd-cfDNA of ≤0.69% was considered negative, regardless of a nonrenal organ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 49 participants with 55 surveillance and/or for-cause biopsies. After exclusion of biopsies not paired with biomarkers, 51 biopsies were evaluated with at least 1 biomarker. Fifty-one biopsies had paired GEP results, whereas 47 biopsies had paired dd-cfDNA results. Overall, there were 12 biopsy-proven acute rejections (24%), 5 of which were T cell-mediated rejections (4-1A and 1-1B), 2 were antibody-mediated rejections, and 5 were borderline for T cell-mediated rejections. GEP by itself in 51 biopsies demonstrated a sensitivity of 17%, specificity of 74%, positive predictive value of 17%, negative predictive value of 74%, and balanced accuracy of 61%. Among 47 paired biopsies, dd-cfDNA demonstrated a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 37%. Median dd-cfDNA was above the positivity threshold for both participants with rejection on biopsy and without (1.86% versus 1.35%, respectively). When evaluating GEP, specifically in surveillance biopsies and patients with liver transplants, diagnostic performance was maintained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot analysis, GEP maintained a high negative predictive value in a multiorgan cohort, regardless of the nonrenal organ. dd-cfDNA did not have good performance when using the kidney threshold cutoff, which was expected and driven by the liver component of multiorgan recipients. Further technological advances with dd-cfDNA to differentiate organs and multiple donors could be impactful. The results support the use of GEP for ruling out kidney rejection in a multiorgan population, including those with a liver transplant. Further evaluation is necessary to confirm the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 3","pages":"e1772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate early signals of the utility of gene expression profile (GEP) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) for ruling out subclinical rejection in multiorgan transplant recipients.

Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, observational pilot study that began enrolling patients in September 2022. Participants were enrolled after providing informed consent and had biomarker samples drawn before surveillance or for-cause biopsy. GEP result of TX was considered negative and a dd-cfDNA of ≤0.69% was considered negative, regardless of a nonrenal organ.

Results: There were 49 participants with 55 surveillance and/or for-cause biopsies. After exclusion of biopsies not paired with biomarkers, 51 biopsies were evaluated with at least 1 biomarker. Fifty-one biopsies had paired GEP results, whereas 47 biopsies had paired dd-cfDNA results. Overall, there were 12 biopsy-proven acute rejections (24%), 5 of which were T cell-mediated rejections (4-1A and 1-1B), 2 were antibody-mediated rejections, and 5 were borderline for T cell-mediated rejections. GEP by itself in 51 biopsies demonstrated a sensitivity of 17%, specificity of 74%, positive predictive value of 17%, negative predictive value of 74%, and balanced accuracy of 61%. Among 47 paired biopsies, dd-cfDNA demonstrated a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 37%. Median dd-cfDNA was above the positivity threshold for both participants with rejection on biopsy and without (1.86% versus 1.35%, respectively). When evaluating GEP, specifically in surveillance biopsies and patients with liver transplants, diagnostic performance was maintained.

Conclusions: In this pilot analysis, GEP maintained a high negative predictive value in a multiorgan cohort, regardless of the nonrenal organ. dd-cfDNA did not have good performance when using the kidney threshold cutoff, which was expected and driven by the liver component of multiorgan recipients. Further technological advances with dd-cfDNA to differentiate organs and multiple donors could be impactful. The results support the use of GEP for ruling out kidney rejection in a multiorgan population, including those with a liver transplant. Further evaluation is necessary to confirm the results.

多器官移植受者基因表达和 dd-cfDNA 的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信