Institutionalizing Respectful Maternity Care as a Standard of Care: A Case Study from Maharashtra in India.

Q2 Medicine
Aparajita Gogoi, Mercy Manoranjini, Tina Ravi, Mamta Gupta
{"title":"Institutionalizing Respectful Maternity Care as a Standard of Care: A Case Study from Maharashtra in India.","authors":"Aparajita Gogoi, Mercy Manoranjini, Tina Ravi, Mamta Gupta","doi":"10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_79_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to institutionalize respectful maternity care (RMC) as a standard of care in public health systems.</p><p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>This study demonstrates the development, implementation, and impact of an intervention package for providing RMC to women availing antenatal, natal, and postnatal services.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An intervention package was developed in consultation with healthcare providers incorporating, (a) capacity-building workshops to empower healthcare staff, (b) mentoring support for developing action plans, and (c) development of behavior change communication material. Key practices such as allowing birth companions and the development of consent forms for different procedures were institutionalized. Baseline (January 2018) and endline (March 2020) evaluations were conducted using mixed methods in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at a medical college in Maharashtra, India. Exit interviews with 100 antenatal women, in-depth interviews (IDIs) with postnatal women (19 in baseline and 8 in endline), and 16-h of labor room observations were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 35 types of disrespect and abuse (D and A) instances, 20 were reported by atleast two methods (any two out of exit interviews/IDIs/labor room observations) - hence considered \"definite.\" A significant improvement was observed in nine types of D and A. However, 11 types of D and A such as issues in providing verbal comfort, using curtains and drapes for examination, provision of changing rooms, taking informed consents for the procedures, and attending to women at her call were still reported/observed at the endline. The interventions led to improved service delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Written policies and procedures, regular training, focused interventions, and using behavior change communication materials have the potential to enhance RMC. However, despite the interventions, many instances of D and A persisted indicating it to be a systemic problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":37393,"journal":{"name":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","volume":"13 2","pages":"78-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/WHO-SEAJPH.WHO-SEAJPH_79_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need to institutionalize respectful maternity care (RMC) as a standard of care in public health systems.

Aim and objectives: This study demonstrates the development, implementation, and impact of an intervention package for providing RMC to women availing antenatal, natal, and postnatal services.

Methodology: An intervention package was developed in consultation with healthcare providers incorporating, (a) capacity-building workshops to empower healthcare staff, (b) mentoring support for developing action plans, and (c) development of behavior change communication material. Key practices such as allowing birth companions and the development of consent forms for different procedures were institutionalized. Baseline (January 2018) and endline (March 2020) evaluations were conducted using mixed methods in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at a medical college in Maharashtra, India. Exit interviews with 100 antenatal women, in-depth interviews (IDIs) with postnatal women (19 in baseline and 8 in endline), and 16-h of labor room observations were conducted.

Results: Of the 35 types of disrespect and abuse (D and A) instances, 20 were reported by atleast two methods (any two out of exit interviews/IDIs/labor room observations) - hence considered "definite." A significant improvement was observed in nine types of D and A. However, 11 types of D and A such as issues in providing verbal comfort, using curtains and drapes for examination, provision of changing rooms, taking informed consents for the procedures, and attending to women at her call were still reported/observed at the endline. The interventions led to improved service delivery.

Conclusions: Written policies and procedures, regular training, focused interventions, and using behavior change communication materials have the potential to enhance RMC. However, despite the interventions, many instances of D and A persisted indicating it to be a systemic problem.

将 "尊重产妇 "作为护理标准制度化:印度马哈拉施特拉邦案例研究》。
背景:有必要将尊重产妇护理(RMC)制度化,作为公共卫生系统的护理标准。目的和目标:本研究展示了为妇女提供产前、分娩和产后服务的RMC干预方案的发展、实施和影响。方法:与保健提供者协商制定了一揽子干预措施,其中包括:(a)能力建设讲习班,增强保健工作人员的权能;(b)为制定行动计划提供指导支持;(c)编写改变行为的宣传材料。诸如允许陪产和为不同程序制定同意表等关键做法已制度化。基线(2018年1月)和终点(2020年3月)评估在印度马哈拉施特拉邦一所医学院的妇产科采用混合方法进行。对100名产前妇女进行了出院访谈,对产后妇女进行了深度访谈(IDIs)(基线19例,终点8例),并进行了16小时的产房观察。结果:在35种不尊重和虐待(D和A)实例中,有20种是通过至少两种方法(离职面谈/IDIs/产房观察的任意两种)报告的,因此被认为是“明确的”。在9种类型的D和A中观察到显着改善。然而,11种类型的D和A,例如提供口头安慰,使用窗帘和窗帘进行检查,提供更衣室,对程序进行知情同意,以及在她打电话时照顾妇女的问题,仍然在结束时报告/观察到。这些干预措施改善了服务的提供。结论:书面政策和程序、定期培训、重点干预和使用行为改变沟通材料具有增强RMC的潜力。然而,尽管采取了干预措施,许多D和A的例子仍然存在,表明这是一个系统性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Public Health, Epidemiology, primary health care, epidemiology, health administration, health systems, health economics, health promotion, public health nutrition, communicable and non-communicable diseases, maternal and child health, occupational and environmental health, social and preventive medicine. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信