POCUS Standoff: Comparing Ultrasound Interfaces for Soft Tissue Foreign Body Imaging.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Carolina Vega, Robert Lindsay, Keyon Shokraneh, Celia S Willard, Timothy Gleeson, Monica Kapoor, Ari Nalbandian, Zachary Binder
{"title":"POCUS Standoff: Comparing Ultrasound Interfaces for Soft Tissue Foreign Body Imaging.","authors":"Carolina Vega, Robert Lindsay, Keyon Shokraneh, Celia S Willard, Timothy Gleeson, Monica Kapoor, Ari Nalbandian, Zachary Binder","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound can be used to identify foreign bodies (FBs) in soft tissue. Imaging interfaces such as standoff pads and water baths can improve image resolution for superficial soft tissue structures. Our objective was to determine the optimal interface for FB detection. We hypothesized that water baths would be associated with the greatest FB detection accuracy and image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective analysis of ultrasound imaging interfaces to detect FBs. 18 emergency physicians in training were enrolled: 8 interns, 8 senior residents, and 2 fellows. Four imaging interfaces were compared: gel, saline bag standoff, water bath, and a novel proposed interface: water-filled patient belongings bag (PBB). Standardized FBs (wood, plastic, and metal) were inserted into porcine models, which were imaged by participants using the interfaces. The primary outcome was the accuracy of FB detection for the interfaces. Secondary outcomes included time to FB detection, image quality, and impact of training level. Ultrasounds were reviewed by 2 blinded ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians to determine FB visibility and image quality. Data analysis was performed using the χ2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test with GraphPad Prism Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen participants completed 16 stations. Two hundred eighty-eight ultrasounds total. Interface types demonstrated a trend of greatest accuracy for PBB, followed by water bath, gel, and saline bag. Gel was significantly more accurate than saline bag (P=0.0120). Gel did not have a significant difference from PBB (P=0.1425) or water bath (P=0.125). As training level increased, time to FB detection significantly decreased (P=0.02), and accuracy increased. Accuracy for fellows was significantly greater than for senior residents (P=0.0473) and interns (P=0.0027). There was a trend of greater accuracy in senior residents from interns.However, there was no significant difference (P=0.0729).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBBs may be a viable alternative interface for soft tissue FB detection. PBBs, water baths, and gel should be considered prior to saline standoffs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound can be used to identify foreign bodies (FBs) in soft tissue. Imaging interfaces such as standoff pads and water baths can improve image resolution for superficial soft tissue structures. Our objective was to determine the optimal interface for FB detection. We hypothesized that water baths would be associated with the greatest FB detection accuracy and image quality.

Methods: Prospective analysis of ultrasound imaging interfaces to detect FBs. 18 emergency physicians in training were enrolled: 8 interns, 8 senior residents, and 2 fellows. Four imaging interfaces were compared: gel, saline bag standoff, water bath, and a novel proposed interface: water-filled patient belongings bag (PBB). Standardized FBs (wood, plastic, and metal) were inserted into porcine models, which were imaged by participants using the interfaces. The primary outcome was the accuracy of FB detection for the interfaces. Secondary outcomes included time to FB detection, image quality, and impact of training level. Ultrasounds were reviewed by 2 blinded ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians to determine FB visibility and image quality. Data analysis was performed using the χ2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test with GraphPad Prism Software.

Results: Eighteen participants completed 16 stations. Two hundred eighty-eight ultrasounds total. Interface types demonstrated a trend of greatest accuracy for PBB, followed by water bath, gel, and saline bag. Gel was significantly more accurate than saline bag (P=0.0120). Gel did not have a significant difference from PBB (P=0.1425) or water bath (P=0.125). As training level increased, time to FB detection significantly decreased (P=0.02), and accuracy increased. Accuracy for fellows was significantly greater than for senior residents (P=0.0473) and interns (P=0.0027). There was a trend of greater accuracy in senior residents from interns.However, there was no significant difference (P=0.0729).

Conclusions: PBBs may be a viable alternative interface for soft tissue FB detection. PBBs, water baths, and gel should be considered prior to saline standoffs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信