Simplifying SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based surveillance using an automated FDA EUA assay.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Shivaprasad H Sathyanarayana, Ashlee A Robins, Diana M Toledo, Torrey L Gallagher, Gregory J Tsongalis, Jacqueline A Hubbard, Joel A Lefferts, Isabella W Martin
{"title":"Simplifying SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based surveillance using an automated FDA EUA assay.","authors":"Shivaprasad H Sathyanarayana, Ashlee A Robins, Diana M Toledo, Torrey L Gallagher, Gregory J Tsongalis, Jacqueline A Hubbard, Joel A Lefferts, Isabella W Martin","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02490-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) can track the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in communities. Laboratory methods for this testing involve labor-intensive, multi-step processes. This study assessed the feasibility of performing WBS with an off-label use of an automated commercial SARS-CoV-2 assay that had received Emergency Use Authorization for human diagnostic testing from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA EUA). Twenty-four-hour composite samples of primary influent wastewater from seven municipalities in New Hampshire and Vermont were collected between September 2020 and February 2021, and were centrifuged upon receipt. An aliquot of fresh supernatant was immediately tested with the Abbott <i>m</i>2000 RealTi<i>m</i>e SARS-CoV-2 assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Corresponding aliquots were then stored at -80°C until they were thawed, polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentrated, and tested by two PCR-based laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Wastewater samples (103) were tested with successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by all three methods. Bland-Altman analysis showed overall concordant results with a bias of -0.13 and -0.42 log copies/mL detected by the FDA EUA assay compared to the LDTs. Specimen stability assessment demonstrated a decrease of 33.9% measurable viral RNA after three freeze-thaw cycles. SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using an FDA EUA assay on an automated commercial testing platform performed comparably but with more efficient workflow when compared to two LDTs. This sample-to-answer automated method could save time and labor for surveillance testing, but further validation of its ability to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is necessary.IMPORTANCEThis proof-of-principle study evaluates an off-label use of an automated United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) human diagnostic assay for wastewater surveillance. Compared to standard, labor-intensive, multi-step methods currently in use for wastewater surveillance testing, an off-label use of an FDA EUA assay on an automated platform offers a sample-to-answer testing requiring less labor and a faster turnaround time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0249024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02490-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) can track the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in communities. Laboratory methods for this testing involve labor-intensive, multi-step processes. This study assessed the feasibility of performing WBS with an off-label use of an automated commercial SARS-CoV-2 assay that had received Emergency Use Authorization for human diagnostic testing from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA EUA). Twenty-four-hour composite samples of primary influent wastewater from seven municipalities in New Hampshire and Vermont were collected between September 2020 and February 2021, and were centrifuged upon receipt. An aliquot of fresh supernatant was immediately tested with the Abbott m2000 RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Corresponding aliquots were then stored at -80°C until they were thawed, polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentrated, and tested by two PCR-based laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Wastewater samples (103) were tested with successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by all three methods. Bland-Altman analysis showed overall concordant results with a bias of -0.13 and -0.42 log copies/mL detected by the FDA EUA assay compared to the LDTs. Specimen stability assessment demonstrated a decrease of 33.9% measurable viral RNA after three freeze-thaw cycles. SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using an FDA EUA assay on an automated commercial testing platform performed comparably but with more efficient workflow when compared to two LDTs. This sample-to-answer automated method could save time and labor for surveillance testing, but further validation of its ability to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is necessary.IMPORTANCEThis proof-of-principle study evaluates an off-label use of an automated United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) human diagnostic assay for wastewater surveillance. Compared to standard, labor-intensive, multi-step methods currently in use for wastewater surveillance testing, an off-label use of an FDA EUA assay on an automated platform offers a sample-to-answer testing requiring less labor and a faster turnaround time.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信