Shivaprasad H Sathyanarayana, Ashlee A Robins, Diana M Toledo, Torrey L Gallagher, Gregory J Tsongalis, Jacqueline A Hubbard, Joel A Lefferts, Isabella W Martin
{"title":"Simplifying SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based surveillance using an automated FDA EUA assay.","authors":"Shivaprasad H Sathyanarayana, Ashlee A Robins, Diana M Toledo, Torrey L Gallagher, Gregory J Tsongalis, Jacqueline A Hubbard, Joel A Lefferts, Isabella W Martin","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02490-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) can track the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in communities. Laboratory methods for this testing involve labor-intensive, multi-step processes. This study assessed the feasibility of performing WBS with an off-label use of an automated commercial SARS-CoV-2 assay that had received Emergency Use Authorization for human diagnostic testing from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA EUA). Twenty-four-hour composite samples of primary influent wastewater from seven municipalities in New Hampshire and Vermont were collected between September 2020 and February 2021, and were centrifuged upon receipt. An aliquot of fresh supernatant was immediately tested with the Abbott <i>m</i>2000 RealTi<i>m</i>e SARS-CoV-2 assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Corresponding aliquots were then stored at -80°C until they were thawed, polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentrated, and tested by two PCR-based laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Wastewater samples (103) were tested with successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by all three methods. Bland-Altman analysis showed overall concordant results with a bias of -0.13 and -0.42 log copies/mL detected by the FDA EUA assay compared to the LDTs. Specimen stability assessment demonstrated a decrease of 33.9% measurable viral RNA after three freeze-thaw cycles. SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using an FDA EUA assay on an automated commercial testing platform performed comparably but with more efficient workflow when compared to two LDTs. This sample-to-answer automated method could save time and labor for surveillance testing, but further validation of its ability to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is necessary.IMPORTANCEThis proof-of-principle study evaluates an off-label use of an automated United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) human diagnostic assay for wastewater surveillance. Compared to standard, labor-intensive, multi-step methods currently in use for wastewater surveillance testing, an off-label use of an FDA EUA assay on an automated platform offers a sample-to-answer testing requiring less labor and a faster turnaround time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0249024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02490-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) can track the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in communities. Laboratory methods for this testing involve labor-intensive, multi-step processes. This study assessed the feasibility of performing WBS with an off-label use of an automated commercial SARS-CoV-2 assay that had received Emergency Use Authorization for human diagnostic testing from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA EUA). Twenty-four-hour composite samples of primary influent wastewater from seven municipalities in New Hampshire and Vermont were collected between September 2020 and February 2021, and were centrifuged upon receipt. An aliquot of fresh supernatant was immediately tested with the Abbott m2000 RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA). Corresponding aliquots were then stored at -80°C until they were thawed, polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentrated, and tested by two PCR-based laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). Wastewater samples (103) were tested with successful detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA by all three methods. Bland-Altman analysis showed overall concordant results with a bias of -0.13 and -0.42 log copies/mL detected by the FDA EUA assay compared to the LDTs. Specimen stability assessment demonstrated a decrease of 33.9% measurable viral RNA after three freeze-thaw cycles. SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater using an FDA EUA assay on an automated commercial testing platform performed comparably but with more efficient workflow when compared to two LDTs. This sample-to-answer automated method could save time and labor for surveillance testing, but further validation of its ability to quantitate SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is necessary.IMPORTANCEThis proof-of-principle study evaluates an off-label use of an automated United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) human diagnostic assay for wastewater surveillance. Compared to standard, labor-intensive, multi-step methods currently in use for wastewater surveillance testing, an off-label use of an FDA EUA assay on an automated platform offers a sample-to-answer testing requiring less labor and a faster turnaround time.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.