Increasing Biosimilar Uptake in Rheumatology Clinics Within a Large Academic Medical Center.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Aemen Zamir, Joad Eseddi, Shannon Wishin, DeAnne Carmichael, Luigino Bernabela, Puneet Bajaj
{"title":"Increasing Biosimilar Uptake in Rheumatology Clinics Within a Large Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Aemen Zamir, Joad Eseddi, Shannon Wishin, DeAnne Carmichael, Luigino Bernabela, Puneet Bajaj","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biological drugs have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatic diseases, but their high cost has contributed to increased prescription drug spending in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of several biosimilars, medications that are like their reference biologics with comparable safety and effectiveness, for use in rheumatic diseases. We describe a cost reduction project at a large academic medical center aimed at increasing the use of biosimilars for rituximab and infliximab within rheumatology clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients aged 17 and older with rheumatologic conditions who were prescribed either infliximab or rituximab. A series of educational and electronic health record (EHR) interventions were implemented between 2018 and 2020 to encourage the use of infliximab-dyyb and rituximab-abbs, both biosimilar agents. We measured the change in utilization of these 2 biosimilars between onset of institutional approval through 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, the overall rate of use of these biosimilars increased from a baseline of <5.0% to 49.4% for infliximab-dyyb and <5.0% to 51.3% for rituximab-abbs. We estimated a total of greater than $3.2 million in cost savings, solely through 2 biosimilar substitutions within 1 specialty clinic at our institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biosimilar use among rheumatology providers in an academic setting can be increased through multimodal interventions including education and EHR modifications. This change has the potential for large cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Biological drugs have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatic diseases, but their high cost has contributed to increased prescription drug spending in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of several biosimilars, medications that are like their reference biologics with comparable safety and effectiveness, for use in rheumatic diseases. We describe a cost reduction project at a large academic medical center aimed at increasing the use of biosimilars for rituximab and infliximab within rheumatology clinics.

Methods: We included patients aged 17 and older with rheumatologic conditions who were prescribed either infliximab or rituximab. A series of educational and electronic health record (EHR) interventions were implemented between 2018 and 2020 to encourage the use of infliximab-dyyb and rituximab-abbs, both biosimilar agents. We measured the change in utilization of these 2 biosimilars between onset of institutional approval through 2023.

Results: During the study period, the overall rate of use of these biosimilars increased from a baseline of <5.0% to 49.4% for infliximab-dyyb and <5.0% to 51.3% for rituximab-abbs. We estimated a total of greater than $3.2 million in cost savings, solely through 2 biosimilar substitutions within 1 specialty clinic at our institution.

Conclusions: Biosimilar use among rheumatology providers in an academic setting can be increased through multimodal interventions including education and EHR modifications. This change has the potential for large cost savings.

在大型学术医疗中心的风湿病诊所增加生物类似药的摄取。
目的:生物药物已经彻底改变了风湿病的治疗,但其高昂的成本导致了美国处方药支出的增加。美国食品和药物管理局已经批准了几种生物仿制药的使用,这些药物与它们的参考生物制剂类似,具有相当的安全性和有效性,用于治疗风湿病。我们描述了一个大型学术医疗中心的成本降低项目,旨在增加在风湿病诊所使用利妥昔单抗和英夫利昔单抗的生物仿制药。方法:我们纳入了17岁及以上的风湿病患者,他们开了英夫利昔单抗或利妥昔单抗。2018年至2020年期间实施了一系列教育和电子健康记录(EHR)干预措施,以鼓励使用英夫利昔单抗-dyyb和利妥昔单抗-abbs这两种生物类似药。我们测量了从机构批准开始到2023年这两种生物仿制药的使用变化。结果:在研究期间,这些生物类似药的总体使用率从基线增加。结论:风湿病学提供者在学术环境中的生物类似药使用可以通过包括教育和电子病历修改在内的多模式干预措施来增加。这一变化有可能节省大量成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信