{"title":"A comprehensive validation study on the influencing factors of cough-based COVID-19 detection through multi-center data with abundant metadata","authors":"Jiakun Shen , Xueshuai Zhang , Yanfen Tang , Pengyuan Zhang , Yonghong Yan , Pengfei Ye , Shaoxing Zhang , Zhihua Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>In recent years, COVID-19 has placed enormous burdens on healthcare systems. Currently, hundreds of thousands of new cases are reported monthly. World Health Organization is managing COVID-19 as a long-term disease, indicating that an efficient and low-cost detection method remains necessary. Previous studies have shown competitive results on cough-based COVID-19 detection combined with deep learning methods. However, most studies have focused only on improving classification performance on single-source data while neglecting the impact of various factors in real-world applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>To this end, we collected clinical and large-scale crowdsourced cough audios with abundant metadata to comprehensively validate the performance differences among different groups. Specifically, we leveraged self-supervised learning for pre-training and fine-tuned the model with data from different sources. Then based on the metadata, we compared the effects of factors such as cough types, symptoms, and infection stages on detection performance. Moreover, we recorded clinical indicators of viral load and antibody levels and observed the correlation between predicted probabilities and indicator values for the first time. Several open-source datasets were tested to verify the model generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The area under receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.79 for clinical data and 0.69 for crowdsourced data, indicating differences between clinical validation and real-world application. The performance in detecting symptomatic COVID-19 subjects is usually better than detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 subjects. The prediction results show weak correlation with clinical indicators on a small number of clinical data. Poor detection performance in recovery individuals and open-source datasets shows a limitation of existing cough-based detection models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our study validated the model performance and limitations using multi-source data with abundant metadata, which helped researchers evaluate the feasibility of cough-based COVID-19 detection model in practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104798"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
In recent years, COVID-19 has placed enormous burdens on healthcare systems. Currently, hundreds of thousands of new cases are reported monthly. World Health Organization is managing COVID-19 as a long-term disease, indicating that an efficient and low-cost detection method remains necessary. Previous studies have shown competitive results on cough-based COVID-19 detection combined with deep learning methods. However, most studies have focused only on improving classification performance on single-source data while neglecting the impact of various factors in real-world applications.
Methods:
To this end, we collected clinical and large-scale crowdsourced cough audios with abundant metadata to comprehensively validate the performance differences among different groups. Specifically, we leveraged self-supervised learning for pre-training and fine-tuned the model with data from different sources. Then based on the metadata, we compared the effects of factors such as cough types, symptoms, and infection stages on detection performance. Moreover, we recorded clinical indicators of viral load and antibody levels and observed the correlation between predicted probabilities and indicator values for the first time. Several open-source datasets were tested to verify the model generalizability.
Results:
The area under receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.79 for clinical data and 0.69 for crowdsourced data, indicating differences between clinical validation and real-world application. The performance in detecting symptomatic COVID-19 subjects is usually better than detecting asymptomatic COVID-19 subjects. The prediction results show weak correlation with clinical indicators on a small number of clinical data. Poor detection performance in recovery individuals and open-source datasets shows a limitation of existing cough-based detection models.
Conclusion:
Our study validated the model performance and limitations using multi-source data with abundant metadata, which helped researchers evaluate the feasibility of cough-based COVID-19 detection model in practical applications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.