Association of chronotype pattern on the quality of sleep and anxiety among medical undergraduates - a cross-sectional study.

Hargun Kaur Khaira, Sonia Kochhar, Jitender Aneja, Madhur Verma, Rajathi Rajendran, Anupinder Thind
{"title":"Association of chronotype pattern on the quality of sleep and anxiety among medical undergraduates - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Hargun Kaur Khaira, Sonia Kochhar, Jitender Aneja, Madhur Verma, Rajathi Rajendran, Anupinder Thind","doi":"10.1515/ijamh-2024-0189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore the relationship between chronotypes, sleep quality, and anxiety among medical undergraduates, providing valuable insights for academic institutions seeking to enhance student well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used, involving 200 medical undergraduates who were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collection included comprehensive clinical histories and the administration of three validated questionnaires: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire Self-Assessment (MEQ-SA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Participants were recruited during class breaks, and informed consent was obtained prior to participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants (76.5 %; n=152) exhibited a neutral chronotype, with a mean MEQ score of 50.18 (±7.781). No significant correlations were found between MEQ scores and variables such as sex, BMI, or electronic media use. However, individuals classified as evening types reported higher anxiety levels, with mean STAI-S and STAI-T scores of 56.09 (±4.566) and 49.09 (±6.202), respectively (ANOVA, F=31.798, p=0.001; F=30.294, p=0.001). The mean global PSQI score was 6.00 (±2.553), with 56 % of participants reporting poor sleep quality. Evening chronotypes had significantly poorer sleep quality, as evidenced by higher PSQI scores (8.14±1.670) (ANOVA, F=43.663, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underscore the need for academic institutions to reconsider the alignment of academic schedules with students' chronotypes, potentially enhancing academic performance and reducing health risks. Despite these contributions, the study has limitations, including geographical and demographic constraints and reliance on self-reported data, suggesting the need for further research to provide more comprehensive insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":13823,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2024-0189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the relationship between chronotypes, sleep quality, and anxiety among medical undergraduates, providing valuable insights for academic institutions seeking to enhance student well-being.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used, involving 200 medical undergraduates who were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data collection included comprehensive clinical histories and the administration of three validated questionnaires: the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire Self-Assessment (MEQ-SA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Participants were recruited during class breaks, and informed consent was obtained prior to participation.

Results: The majority of participants (76.5 %; n=152) exhibited a neutral chronotype, with a mean MEQ score of 50.18 (±7.781). No significant correlations were found between MEQ scores and variables such as sex, BMI, or electronic media use. However, individuals classified as evening types reported higher anxiety levels, with mean STAI-S and STAI-T scores of 56.09 (±4.566) and 49.09 (±6.202), respectively (ANOVA, F=31.798, p=0.001; F=30.294, p=0.001). The mean global PSQI score was 6.00 (±2.553), with 56 % of participants reporting poor sleep quality. Evening chronotypes had significantly poorer sleep quality, as evidenced by higher PSQI scores (8.14±1.670) (ANOVA, F=43.663, p=0.001).

Conclusions: The findings underscore the need for academic institutions to reconsider the alignment of academic schedules with students' chronotypes, potentially enhancing academic performance and reducing health risks. Despite these contributions, the study has limitations, including geographical and demographic constraints and reliance on self-reported data, suggesting the need for further research to provide more comprehensive insights.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health
International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health (IJAMH) provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of new information in the field of adolescence. IJAMH is a peer-reviewed journal that covers all aspects of adolescence. Manuscripts will be reviewed from disciplines all over the world. The International Editorial Board is dedicated to producing a high quality scientific journal of interest to researchers and practitioners from many disciplines. Topics Medicine and Clinical Medicine Health issues Adolescents Hygiene and Environmental Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信