Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment of the Turkish Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Salim Yilmaz, Metin Ateş, Perihan Abay
{"title":"Adaptation and Psychometric Assessment of the Turkish Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability Analysis.","authors":"Salim Yilmaz, Metin Ateş, Perihan Abay","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Access to health services is a fundamental element of social welfare and individual quality of life. This study aimed to fill gaps in the Turkish literature regarding the assessment and perception of access to health services and to introduce a valid and reliable measurement tool for this purpose. <b>Methods:</b> This methodological cross-sectional study was conducted in Istanbul with 639 adults aged 18-65 years. Linguistic and cultural appropriateness were evaluated, and validation was assessed through known group validity using sociodemographic factors. Convergent and divergent validity analyses were performed. Reliability was examined using alpha coefficients and 27% percentile discrimination. A secondary confirmatory factor analysis provided the overall score for the scale. <b>Results:</b> The scale was validated on four factors, and seven items were removed during refinement, resulting in a final twenty-three-item scale. Internal consistency was robust, with alpha coefficients of 0.899 for acceptability and affordability, 0.825 for availability, 0.773 for accommodation, 0.892 for awareness, and 0.943 for overall access. Perceived access to health services was significantly correlated with age, beliefs in easy access to health, and satisfaction with outpatient care. <b>Conclusions:</b> The validated scale provides a reliable tool for measuring perceptions of access to health services, which is essential for shaping health policies and practices. Comprehensive assessments using such tools can help discern nuanced distinctions between perceived and actual access.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Access to health services is a fundamental element of social welfare and individual quality of life. This study aimed to fill gaps in the Turkish literature regarding the assessment and perception of access to health services and to introduce a valid and reliable measurement tool for this purpose. Methods: This methodological cross-sectional study was conducted in Istanbul with 639 adults aged 18-65 years. Linguistic and cultural appropriateness were evaluated, and validation was assessed through known group validity using sociodemographic factors. Convergent and divergent validity analyses were performed. Reliability was examined using alpha coefficients and 27% percentile discrimination. A secondary confirmatory factor analysis provided the overall score for the scale. Results: The scale was validated on four factors, and seven items were removed during refinement, resulting in a final twenty-three-item scale. Internal consistency was robust, with alpha coefficients of 0.899 for acceptability and affordability, 0.825 for availability, 0.773 for accommodation, 0.892 for awareness, and 0.943 for overall access. Perceived access to health services was significantly correlated with age, beliefs in easy access to health, and satisfaction with outpatient care. Conclusions: The validated scale provides a reliable tool for measuring perceptions of access to health services, which is essential for shaping health policies and practices. Comprehensive assessments using such tools can help discern nuanced distinctions between perceived and actual access.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信